Parliament bill

Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill

Royal assent

Last checked
July 15, 2026 15:52
Source captured
July 15, 2026 15:52
Source
View on Parliament.nz

What this bill does

The bill passed its third reading by voice vote; no party or individual counts were recorded. According to the bill’s explanatory material, Auckland transport decisions have lacked clear democratic accountability and coordinated long-term planning between Auckland Council and the Government. The bill aims to make local transport decision-making more accountable and align long-term transport planning and investment priorities. The bill moves most transport planning, road-control and delivery functions from Auckland Transport to Auckland Council, with specified powers for local boards over local and collector roads. It creates a joint Auckland Regional Transport Committee to prepare a 30-year plan, while a transport CCO focuses on public transport services.

AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.

Latest voting result

April 30, 2026
Third reading: Passed Voice vote

Decision recorded by voice vote; no individual or party counts were recorded.

View the vote in Hansard

Arguments raised in Parliament

AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.

Arguments for

Aucklanders will be able to hold elected decision-makers accountable for local transport because the bill transfers most local transport functions from Auckland Transport to Auckland Council and local boards, which is expected to make responsibility for daily transport decisions clearer.

The Auckland Regional Transport Committee’s 30-year plan will align Crown and Auckland Council priorities and investment, giving Auckland a more coherent long-term direction for transport infrastructure.

Local boards will be able to make transport decisions on local and collector roads, allowing communities to influence matters such as speed limits, parking, and active transport closer to where effects are experienced.

Arguments against

Auckland communities may be bypassed because half of the Auckland Regional Transport Committee is appointed by the Minister and the other half is effectively controlled by the mayor, rather than being predominantly locally elected representatives.

Disabled Aucklanders may be excluded from planning because the bill contains no specific requirement for disability representation or universal-access input, causing accessibility needs to be overlooked and costlier to remedy later.

Māori may receive inadequate influence over transport outcomes because the bill requires consultation but does not guarantee Māori governance representation or require the plan to reflect Te Tiriti principles.

Nuance and qualifications

Bill text

Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill

Version published April 28, 2026 00:00.

Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Act 2025 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. 3 Principal Act This Act amends the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. 4 Section 4 amended (Interpretation) In section 4(1), repeal the definition of Auckland Transport . In section 4(1), definition of substantive council-controlled organisation , paragraph (b), replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . In section 4(1), insert in their appropriate alphabetical order: accessible format means a copy of a document in an alternative form that gives persons who have a print disability access to the document transport CCO means the entity continued by section 43 5 New section 4B inserted (Act binds the Crown) After section 4A, insert: 4B Act binds the Crown 1 Except as provided in subsection (2) , this Act does not bind the Crown. 2 The following provisions of this Act bind the Crown: a subparts 1, 2, and 4 of Part 4 ; and b clauses 4 to 6 of Schedule 1AA. 6 Section 7 amen…
Read full bill text
Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Act 2025 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. 3 Principal Act This Act amends the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. 4 Section 4 amended (Interpretation) In section 4(1), repeal the definition of Auckland Transport . In section 4(1), definition of substantive council-controlled organisation , paragraph (b), replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . In section 4(1), insert in their appropriate alphabetical order: accessible format means a copy of a document in an alternative form that gives persons who have a print disability access to the document transport CCO means the entity continued by section 43 5 New section 4B inserted (Act binds the Crown) After section 4A, insert: 4B Act binds the Crown 1 Except as provided in subsection (2) , this Act does not bind the Crown. 2 The following provisions of this Act bind the Crown: a subparts 1, 2, and 4 of Part 4 ; and b clauses 4 to 6 of Schedule 1AA. 6 Section 7 amended (Decision-making of Council shared between governing body and local boards) In section 7(1)(b), after sections 14 to 23 , insert and 47A . 7 Section 12 amended (Status of local boards) Replace section 12(4) with: 4 Nothing in this section limits— a the responsibility of a local board to make the decisions of the Auckland Council that are allocated to it in accordance with section 16 : b the ability of a local board to exercise a power, or perform a function or responsibility, that is conferred on it under sections 47A to 47D . 8 Section 13 amended (Functions, duties, and powers of local boards) In section 13(2)(d), delete or Auckland Transport under section 54 . After section 13(2)(d), insert: da must undertake any functions and responsibilities conferred on it under sections 47A to 47D ; and db may exercise any of the powers conferred on it under sections 47A to 47D ; and In section 13(2)(f), delete or Auckland Transport under section 54 . 9 Section 14 amended (General scheme) In section 14(1), replace This section sets with Subsections (1) to (4) set . After section 14(4), insert: 5 See also section 47A , which sets out the division of powers, functions, and responsibilities between the governing body and local boards regarding transport matters specifically dealt with in subpart 4 of Part 4 . 10 Section 15 amended (Decision-making responsibilities of governing body) In section 15(1)(a), after 2002) , insert , subject to sections 47A to 47D . In section 15(1)(b)(i), after infrastructure , insert (subject to sections 47A to 47D ) . 11 Section 16 amended (Decision-making responsibilities of local boards) After section 16(1)(d), insert: e the decision making of the Auckland Council in relation to the matters conferred on local boards under sections 47A to 47D . 12 Section 37 amended (Interpretation) In section 37(1), insert in their appropriate alphabetical order: arterial road means a road that is classified as an arterial road under section 48(2)(a) Auckland Regional Transport Committee or ARTC means the Auckland Regional Transport Committee established by section 38 Auckland Roading Classification Framework or Roading Framework means the framework set out in section 48 city centre road means a road that is classified as a city centre road under section 48(2)(d) collector road means a road that is classified as a collector road under section 48(2)(c) Eden Park precinct road means a road that is classified as an Eden Park precinct road under section 48(2)(e) fees framework means the fees framework as defined in section 10(1) of the Crown Entities Act 2004 local road means a road that is classified as a local road under section 48(2)(b) mayoral appointees means the members appointed to the ARTC by the mayor under section 38D(c) ministerial appointees means the members appointed to the ARTC by the Minister of Transport under section 38D(b) natural person act has the meaning set out in section 24 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 non-voting members means the members appointed to the ARTC by the New Zealand Transport Agency, KiwiRail, or the transport CCO under section 38D(d), (e), or (f) permanent advisors means the persons made the permanent advisors to the ARTC by section 41A residual road means a road that is classified as a residual road under section 48(2)(f) In section 37(1), repeal the definitions of Auckland transport system , Director of Land Transport , and New Zealand Railways Corporation . In section 37(1), definition of director , replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . In section 37(2), replace land transport , with KiwiRail , land transport , public transport service , . In section 37(2), after regional land transport plan , , insert regional public transport plan , Secretary , . 13 Sections 38 to 56 and cross-headings repealed Repeal sections 38 to 56 and the cross-headings above sections 38, 43, 45, 49, and 53. 14 New subparts 1 to 4 of Part 4 inserted After section 37, insert: 1 Auckland Regional Transport Committee Functions and membership of ARTC 38 Auckland Regional Transport Committee 1 This section establishes the Auckland Regional Transport Committee. 2 The purpose of the ARTC is to develop and maintain a long-term direction for land transport in Auckland that is shared by Auckland Council and the Government, so that there will be— a streamlined and co-ordinated planning; and b optimisation of the Crown’s and Auckland Council’s resources; and c transparent transport decision making. 38A Functions of ARTC The functions of the ARTC are to— a prepare the 30-year transport plan under section 42 ; and b monitor the delivery of the 30-year transport plan; and c prepare the regional land transport plan for Auckland in accordance with the Land Transport Management Act 2003; and d undertake any other transport responsibilities, duties, functions, or powers that the Auckland Council may delegate to it under section 38B ; and e undertake any other transport functions prescribed by regulations made under section 38C . 38B Delegation to ARTC 1 Auckland Council may delegate to the ARTC any of its responsibilities, duties, functions, or powers that relate to land transport in Auckland. 2 Before delegating a responsibility, duty, function, or power under subsection (1) , Auckland Council must consult the Minister of Transport. 3 A delegation does not prevent Auckland Council from performing any responsibility, duty, or function, or exercising any power, or affect Auckland Council’s responsibility for the actions of the ARTC under the delegation. 38C Regulations prescribing ARTC functions 1 The Governor-General may, by Order in Council, in accordance with a recommendation of the Minister of Transport, make regulations that prescribe transport functions that the ARTC must perform (in addition to the functions set out in section 38A(a) to (d) ). 2 Before making a recommendation under subsection (1) , the Minister of Transport must consult the mayor. 3 Regulations made under this section are secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). 38D Membership of ARTC The ARTC comprises the following members: a a chairperson: b up to 3 members appointed by the Minister of Transport: c up to 3 members appointed by the mayor (who must be members of the governing body and may include the mayor): d 1 non-voting member appointed by and to represent the New Zealand Transport Agency (who must hold an identified office or position within the New Zealand Transport Agency): e 1 non-voting member appointed by and to represent KiwiRail (who must hold an identified office or position within KiwiRail): f 1 non-voting member appointed by and to represent the transport CCO (who must hold an identified office or position within the transport CCO). 38E Appointment of chairperson 1 The chairperson of the ARTC is jointly appointed by— a the mayor (who must have consulted the governing body); and b the Minister of Transport. 2 When appointing the chairperson, sections 28 to 31 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 apply— a as if a reference to the responsible Minister were a reference to the Minister and the mayor; and b with any necessary modifications. 3 Despite subsection (2) ,— a the Minister must comply with section 28(4) of that Act: b section 31(2) of that Act does not apply. 38F Appointment of members by Minister of Transport or mayor 1 When appointing the ministerial appointees, sections 28 to 31 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 apply— a as if a reference to the responsible Minister were a reference to the Minister of Transport; and b with any necessary modifications. 2 Despite subsection (1) , section 31(2) of that Act does not apply. 3 The following requirements apply to the appointment of the mayoral appointees: a the mayor must consult the governing body before making an appointment: b an appointment must be made by written notice to the appointee (with a copy to the ARTC) stating— i the date on which the appointment takes effect, which must not be earlier than the date on which the notice is received; and ii the term of the appointment: c the mayor must ensure that the following are notified in the Gazette as soon as is reasonably practicable after an appointment is made: i the name of the appointee; and ii the date on which the appointment takes effect; and iii the term of the appointment. 38G Term of office of members 1 A member of the ARTC holds office for 3 years or for any shorter period stated in the notice of appointment. 2 A member may be reappointed. 3 This section is subject to sections 39 to 39B . Resignation, removal, vacation of office, remuneration, etc, of members 39 Resignation of members 1 The chairperson, a ministerial appointee, or a mayoral appointee may resign from office by written notice to the mayor and the Minister of Transport (with a copy to the ARTC) signed by the member. 2 A resignation under subsection (1) is effective on receipt of the notice by both the mayor and the Minister, or at any later time specified in the notice. 3 A non-voting member may resign from office by giving notice to their appointing organisation in any manner required by the organisation, if any. 4 If a non-voting member resigns under subsection (3) ,— a the appointing organisation must advise the chairperson; and b the chairperson must advise the Minister and the mayor. 39A Removal of members 1 The mayor and the Minister of Transport may, jointly, at any time and entirely at their discretion, remove the chairperson of the ARTC from office. 2 The Minister of Transport may, at any time and entirely at the Minister’s discretion, remove a ministerial appointee from office. 3 The mayor may, at any time and entirely at the mayor’s discretion, remove a mayoral appointee from office. 4 The following requirements apply to the removal of a member under subsection (1), (2), or (3) : a the removal must be made by written notice to the member (with a copy to the ARTC): b the notice must state the date on which the removal takes effect, which must not be earlier than the date on which the notice is received: c the person removing the member must notify the removal in the Gazette as soon as practicable after giving the notice. 5 A non-voting member may be removed from office by their appointing organisation, and— a the appointing organisation must advise the chairperson; and b the chairperson must advise the Minister and the mayor. 39B Vacation of office 1 If a member of the ARTC becomes a member of Parliament, the member’s appointment to the ARTC ends. 2 If a mayoral appointee ceases to be a member of the governing body (for example, because of the operation of clause 1 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002), the member’s appointment to the ARTC ends. 39C Vacancies 1 Subsection (2) applies if— a a member’s term of office expires: b a member resigns: c a member is removed: d a member’s appointment to the ARTC ends under section 39B . 2 If this subsection applies, a vacancy exists in the ARTC until the member is reappointed or replaced. 3 A vacancy in the ARTC does not affect the validity of any act or proceeding of the ARTC or of a subcommittee of the ARTC. 39D No compensation for loss of office A member of the ARTC is not entitled to any compensation or other payment or benefit relating to their ceasing, for any reason, to hold office as a member. 39E Remuneration of members 1 The chairperson of the ARTC is entitled to receive remuneration not within section 39F for services as the chairperson at a rate and of a kind jointly determined by the mayor and the Minister of Transport in accordance with the fees framework. 2 The chairperson’s remuneration must be paid by the Crown and Auckland Council in equal shares. 3 The ministerial appointees are entitled to receive from the Crown remuneration not within section 39F for services as members at a rate and of a kind determined by the Minister of Transport in accordance with the fees framework. 4 The mayoral appointees are entitled to receive from Auckland Council remuneration, allowances, and expenses for services as members as determined by the Remuneration Authority under clauses 6 to 9 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002. 5 A non-voting member is not entitled to any remuneration for services as a member of the ARTC in addition to their remuneration in respect of their office or position within their appointing organisation. 39F Expenses of members 1 The chairperson of the ARTC is entitled, in accordance with the fees framework, to be reimbursed for their actual and reasonable travelling and other expenses incurred in carrying out their office as the chairperson. 2 The chairperson’s expenses must be paid by the Crown and Auckland Council in equal shares. 3 The ministerial appointees are entitled, in accordance with the fees framework, to be reimbursed by the Crown for actual and reasonable travelling and other expenses incurred in carrying out their office as a member. Duties of members, conflicts of interest, and validity of appointments and acts 40 General duties of members A member of the ARTC must— a not contravene, or cause the contravention of, or agree to the ARTC contravening, this Act or any other enactment: b when acting as a member, act with honesty and integrity: c when acting as a member, act in good faith and not pursue their own interests at the expense of the performance of the ARTC’s functions: d when acting as a member, exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a reasonable person would exercise in the same circumstances, taking into account (without limitation)— i the nature of the action; and ii the nature of the responsibilities undertaken by the member. 40A Conflicts of interest Schedule 3 applies to the ARTC. 40B Validity of appointments 1 The appointment of a person as a member of the ARTC is not invalid only because a defect existed in the appointment of the person. 2 This section does not apply to— a a defect in the qualifications for appointment of a member or chairperson (for example, because they were disqualified under section 30 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 as applied by section 38F ); or b a mayoral appointee who was not a member of the governing body. 40C Validity of members’ acts The acts of a person as a member of the ARTC are valid even though— a a defect existed in the appointment of the person; or b the person is or was disqualified from being a member (for example, because they are or were disqualified under section 30 of the Crown Entities Act 2004 as applied by section 38F ); or c the member’s appointment to the ARTC has ended (for example, because of the operation of section 39B ). Meetings, decision making, and reporting 41 Meetings of ARTC 1 The ARTC must hold the meetings that are necessary for it to undertake its functions and, at a minimum, must meet once every 3 months. 2 The ARTC may, in its discretion, hold a meeting in private or in public. 3 If a meeting is held in public, the ARTC must allow a reasonable opportunity for members of the public to speak or otherwise put forward their views. 41A Permanent advisors 1 The Council’s chief executive and the Secretary are the permanent advisors to the ARTC. 2 The permanent advisors are not members of the ARTC. 3 The ARTC must seek and consider advice from the permanent advisors on all matters relating to the performance of its functions. 4 This section does not prevent the ARTC from seeking advice from any other person. 41B Voting at meetings 1 The chairperson, each ministerial appointee, and each mayoral appointee have 1 vote. 2 In addition to a general vote, the chairperson has, in the case of an equality of votes, a casting vote. 3 A resolution of the ARTC is passed if it is agreed to by all members who are entitled to vote and who are present, or if a majority of the votes cast on it are in favour of it. 4 A member who is entitled to vote and who is present at a meeting of the ARTC is presumed to have agreed to, and to have voted in favour of, a resolution unless they expressly dissented from or voted against the resolution at the meeting. 41C Subcommittees 1 The ARTC may appoint any subcommittees that it considers appropriate. 2 A subcommittee is subject to the control of the ARTC and must carry out all general and special directions given to it by the ARTC. 3 At least 1 member of a subcommittee must be a member of the ARTC. 4 The ARTC may appoint to a subcommittee a person who is not a member of the ARTC if, in the opinion of the ARTC, that person has the skills, attributes, or knowledge that will assist the work of the subcommittee. 5 The ARTC may discharge or reconstitute a subcommittee at any time. 41D Standing orders 1 The ARTC must adopt a set of standing orders for the conduct of its meetings and those of its subcommittees. 2 The standing orders must not contravene this Act. 3 The ARTC or subcommittee may temporarily suspend standing orders during a meeting, and the reason for the suspension must be stated in the resolution of suspension. 4 The adoption, suspension, amendment, or replacement of the standing orders requires a vote of not less than 75% of the members present. 41E Minutes of decisions 1 The ARTC must keep minutes of its decisions. 2 Minutes of decisions are prima facie evidence of those decisions. 3 Minutes must be made available to the public in any manner and format that the ARTC considers appropriate. 4 The ARTC may, when complying with subsection (3) , withhold any information contained in the minutes if there is good reason for withholding the information under section 5 of the Official Information Act 1982. Guidance note The ARTC and its permanent advisors are an organisation for the purposes of section 2 of the Official Information Act 1982 because the organisation is named in Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the Ombudsmen Act 1975. 41F Reporting The ARTC must give regular reports to the Minister of Transport and the mayor on its activities. 2 30-year transport plan for Auckland 42 30-year transport plan for Auckland 1 The ARTC must prepare a 30-year transport plan for Auckland. 2 The purpose of a plan is to provide direction for the development of land transport in Auckland for the following 30 years that— a aligns the priorities of the Government and Auckland Council; and b sets the strategic direction for the planning and funding of, and the investment in, land transport in Auckland. 3 A plan must promote the following objectives: a productivity and economic growth: b the safe and rapid movement of people and goods: c efficient asset management. 4 A plan is effective after it has been approved by— a the Minister of Transport; and b Auckland Council. 5 Without limiting section 42G , Auckland Council must take the 30-year transport plan for Auckland into account when preparing any relevant plans or policies. 42A Publication of plan After a 30-year transport plan for Auckland has been approved under section 42(4) , it must be made available to the public in any manner and format (which must include an accessible format) that the ARTC considers appropriate to the preferences and needs of the persons who will or may be affected by, or have an interest in, the plan. 42B Preparation of plan 1 When preparing a 30-year transport plan for Auckland, the ARTC must— a seek direction from the Minister of Transport and the mayor; and b establish and maintain processes to provide opportunities for Māori to contribute to the development and preparation of the plan. 2 When preparing a plan, the ARTC must take into account— a the GPS on land transport issued under section 66 of the Land Transport Management Act 2003: b government strategies and policies that have implications for transport and land use: c Auckland Council strategies and policies that have implications for transport and land use. 3 In subsection (2)(b) , strategies and policies includes a national environmental standard, a national policy statement, or a national planning standard made under Part 5 of the Resource Management Act 1991. 42C Content of plan A 30-year transport plan for Auckland must include— a the long-term strategic direction for land transport in Auckland: b the results that are intended to be achieved: c the policies and actions necessary to achieve the results: d how progress towards achieving the results will be measured: e detailed investment priorities for the first 10 years of the period covered by the plan: f general investment priorities for the entire period covered by the plan: g the likely sources of funding. 42D Consultation on plan 1 The ARTC must undertake consultation in accordance with this section in relation to a 30-year transport plan for Auckland before the plan can be approved under section 42 . 2 The ARTC must follow the following consultation process: a the proposed plan must be made available to the public in any manner and format (which must include an accessible format) that the ARTC considers appropriate to the preferences and needs of the persons who will or may be affected by, or have an interest in, the plan: b those persons should be encouraged to present their views to the ARTC: c those persons should be given clear information concerning the purpose of the consultation and the scope of the decisions to be taken following the consideration of views presented: d members of the public should be given a reasonable opportunity to present their views in a manner and format that is appropriate to the preferences and needs of the persons who will or may be affected by, or have an interest in, the plan: e the views presented should be received with an open mind and given due consideration, and the proposed plan should be amended if the ARTC considers it appropriate: f persons who presented their views should have access to a clear record or description of the decisions made by the ARTC and explanatory material relating to those decisions, which may include, for example, reports relating to the matter that were considered before the decisions were made. 3 The ARTC must, in addition to the consultation under subsection (2) , consult Māori in relation to the proposed plan. 42E Minor or technical amendments Sections 42B and 42D do not apply to minor or technical amendments to a 30-year transport plan for Auckland. 42F Review of plan 1 The ARTC must, within 6 years of the completion of a 30-year transport plan for Auckland under section 42 ,— a review the plan; and b prepare a replacement plan. 2 If the Minister of Transport and the mayor think a plan should be reviewed and replaced at an earlier time than the time specified in subsection (1) , they may, by a joint written instruction, instruct the ARTC to comply with subsection (1) by the date specified in the instruction. 42G LTP must take plan into account When preparing the LTP, Auckland Council must take the 30-year transport plan for Auckland into account. 3 Transport CCO for Auckland Status, purpose, etc, of transport CCO 43 Transport CCO for Auckland continues 1 This section continues the transport council-controlled organisation for Auckland (the transport CCO ) that was established by section 38 of this Act as in force immediately before the commencement of the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Act 2025 . 2 The transport CCO is— a a body corporate with perpetual succession; and b a council-controlled organisation of the Auckland Council. 3 For the purposes of the Local Government Act 2002, Auckland Council must be treated as if it were the sole shareholder of the transport CCO. 43A Purpose of transport CCO The purpose of the transport CCO is to provide public transport services in Auckland that connect communities in an efficient, effective, and safe manner, and perform any of its other functions, in accordance with— a this Part; and b the objectives of the Auckland Council referred to in section 59(1)(a) of the Local Government Act 2002. 43B Operating principles of transport CCO In meeting its principal objective (as a council-controlled organisation) under section 59 of the Local Government Act 2002, and in performing its functions, the transport CCO must— a establish and maintain processes for Māori to contribute to its decision-making processes; and b operate in a financially responsible manner and, for this purpose, prudently manage its assets and liabilities and endeavour to ensure— i its long-term financial viability; and ii that it acts as a successful going concern; and c use its revenue efficiently, effectively, and in a manner that seeks value for money; and d ensure that its revenue and expenditure are accounted for in a transparent manner; and e ensure that it acts in a transparent manner in making decisions under this Act and the Land Transport Management Act 2003. Guidance note The transport CCO is also subject to the requirements of a substantial council-controlled organisation set out in sections 90 to 96 . 43C Status and powers of transport CCO 1 In fulfilling its purpose, the transport CCO has— a full capacity to carry on or undertake any activity or business, do any act, or enter into any transaction; and b for the purposes of paragraph (a) , full rights, powers, and privileges. 2 Subsection (1) is subject to the rest of this Act. 43D Transport CCO’s status as council-controlled organisation and application of Part 5 of Local Government Act 2002 1 For the purposes of section 43(2)(b) , Part 5 of the Local Government Act 2002 applies to the transport CCO with the modifications set out in subsections (2) and (3) . 2 The following provisions of Part 5 of the Local Government Act 2002 do not apply to the transport CCO: a section 56: b sections 62 and 63: c sections 71A and 72. 3 Section 60 of the Local Government Act 2002 must be read as if the following paragraphs were inserted after paragraph (b): c the provisions of Part 4 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009; and d any rules made by the Auckland Council under section 46A of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. Functions, powers, etc, of transport CCO 44 Functions of transport CCO 1 The primary function of the transport CCO is to provide public transport services within Auckland in a manner that is consistent with the regional public transport plan adopted for Auckland ( see also section 45C ). 2 The transport CCO has the following additional functions: a any other transport functions that the Auckland Council may lawfully direct it to perform or delegate to it under section 46 : b without limiting paragraph (a) , any transport functions expressly conferred on the Auckland Council by any enactment (for example, under a local Act) that the Council may lawfully direct it to perform or delegate to it: c any other functions that are given to it by this Act or any other enactment, or that are incidental and related to, or consequential upon, any of its functions under this Act or any other enactment. 4 Nothing in this section vests ownership of any road, land, or other property in the transport CCO or affects the operation of section 316(1) of the Local Government Act 1974 . 44A Transport CCO may delegate certain powers, functions, etc 1 The transport CCO may delegate to any of its committees or employees any of its responsibilities, duties, functions, and powers (the specified actions ) except— a the power to borrow money or purchase or dispose of any assets of the transport CCO; and b any duty to appoint a chief executive officer. 2 A delegation under this section— a must be in writing; and b may be subject to any restrictions or conditions. 3 The transport CCO’s power to delegate to a committee or employee under subsection (1) includes the power to delegate anything precedent to the transport CCO’s exercise or performance of a power or duty (after consultation with the committee or employee). 4 In respect of a committee or employee delegated a specified action under subsection (1) , the committee or employee may subdelegate the specified action to a subcommittee or other person (as the case may be). 5 A subdelegation under this section— a must be in writing; and b is subject to any restrictions or conditions that the transport CCO imposes in the delegation under subsection (1) to which the subdelegation relates. 6 A person to whom any specified action is delegated or subdelegated may exercise or perform that specified action in the same manner, subject to the same restrictions, and with the same effect as if the specified action had been directly conferred on them by this Act and not by delegation or subdelegation. 7 A delegation or subdelegation does not affect the transport CCO’s liability or legal responsibility to perform, or to ensure the performance of, any function or duty. 8 This section— a is subject to any provision to the contrary in this, or any other, Act; and b does not exclude the provision of any power of delegation that the transport CCO has under any other enactment. Governing body of transport CCO 45 Governing body of transport CCO 1 The governing body of the transport CCO is the board of directors. 2 The board of directors comprises no fewer than 3 and no more than 5 directors. 3 The board, including its chairperson and deputy chairperson, must be appointed by the Auckland Council. 4 However, the Auckland Council must not appoint a person as a director if that person is— a a member of the governing body of Auckland Council; or b a member of a local board; or c an employee or board member of the New Zealand Transport Agency; or d an employee or director of KiwiRail. 5 The powers and functions of the transport CCO are not affected by any vacancy in the membership of the board of directors. 45A Duties of transport CCO governing body directors 1 A director must not— a breach, or cause a breach of, this Act; or b agree to any breach of this Act by the transport CCO. 2 When acting as a director, a director must— a act with honesty and integrity; and b act in good faith and not pursue their own interests at the expense of the interests of the transport CCO; and c exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a reasonable person would exercise in the same circumstances, taking into account (without limitation)— i the nature of the transport CCO; and ii the nature of the action; and iii the position of the director and the nature of the responsibilities undertaken by the director. 45B Validity of office holders’ acts The acts of a person as a director, chairperson, or deputy chairperson of the transport CCO are not invalidated by— a a defect in the appointment of the person; or b the fact that the occasion for the person’s acts, or for their appointment, had not arisen or had ended. 4 Provisions relating to Auckland Council Auckland Council’s relationship with transport CCO 45C Transport CCO to undertake public transport activities specified by Council 1 The Auckland Council must specify, in the LTP, the activities that the transport CCO must undertake in performing its primary function set out in section 44(1) (the public transport activities ). 2 The Auckland Council may vary the public transport activities by amending the LTP. 3 In respect of performing its primary function set out in section 44(1) , the transport CCO must undertake only the public transport activities. 4 If, under subsection (1) , the Auckland Council requires the transport CCO to exercise a power, or perform a function, obligation, or any other action, of a regional council under a provision of Part 5 of the Land Transport Management Act 2003, a reference to a regional council in that provision is to be read as if it were a reference to the transport CCO. 46 Council may delegate certain powers, functions, etc 1 The Auckland Council may delegate any of its responsibilities, duties, functions, and powers (the specified actions ) to the transport CCO if— a the Council is satisfied that it is appropriate for the transport CCO to exercise or perform the specified action; and b the Minister of Transport approves the proposed delegation. 2 However,— a the Auckland Council must not delegate the power to delegate under this section to the transport CCO; and b despite anything to the contrary in any enactment, the Auckland Council must not delegate a specified action to the transport CCO except in accordance with this section. 3 A delegation under this section— a must be in writing; and b may be subject to any restrictions or conditions. 4 In respect of a delegation of a specified action under subsection (1) , the transport CCO may subdelegate that specified action to an employee of the transport CCO. 5 A subdelegation under this section— a must be in writing; and b is subject to any restrictions or conditions that the Auckland Council imposes in the delegation under subsection (1) to which the subdelegation relates. 6 Subject to any restriction or condition specified in a delegation or subdelegation under this section, the transport CCO or subdelegate (as the case may be) may exercise or perform the specified action to which the delegation or subdelegation relates in the same manner, subject to the same restrictions, and with the same effect as if the specified action had been directly conferred on them by this Act and not by delegation or subdelegation. 7 A delegation or subdelegation under this section does not— a affect or prevent the Auckland Council from performing or exercising the specified action that is delegated; and b affect the Auckland Council’s liability or legal responsibility to perform or exercise, or to ensure the performance or exercise of, any specified action. 46A Council may make operating rules for transport CCO 1 The Auckland Council may make rules by which the transport CCO must operate, including rules in relation to— a how the governing body of the transport CCO must operate: aa the scope of the transport CCO’s operations in respect of its functions: ab the transport CCO’s adherence to the strategic direction of the Auckland Council (as set out in, for example, the transport CCO’s statement of intent and the 30-year transport plan): ac the procedures for dispute resolution between the Auckland Council and the transport CCO: b how the transport CCO must appoint and employ staff (including its chief executive): c how the transport CCO must acquire and dispose of significant assets: d how the transport CCO must procure goods and services to fulfil its functions. 2 A rule made under this section must not be inconsistent with the rest of this Act or with Part 5 of the Local Government Act 2002. 3 Section 6(3)(d) of the Local Government Act 2002 applies to a rule made under this section. 46AB Restriction on Council’s ability to perform transport CCO’s functions The Auckland Council must not perform— a the functions of the transport CCO specified in section 44 (including functions delegated to, or conferred on, the transport CCO under that section or any other legislation); and b the public transport activities set out in section 45C . 46AB Restriction on Council’s ability to undertake public transport activities The Auckland Council must not undertake the public transport activities set out in section 45C . 46B Restriction on borrowing The transport CCO must not borrow any funds without the written agreement of the Auckland Council. Division of transport responsibilities within Auckland Council 47 Auckland Council is road controlling authority 1 The Auckland Council is the road controlling authority (as defined in section 2(1) of the Land Transport Act 1998) in relation to the roads within Auckland. 2 See sections 47A to 47D for the division of responsibilities between the governing body and local boards in respect of the transport powers, functions, and responsibilities of the Auckland Council. 47A Division of responsibilities between governing body and local boards in respect of transport matters 1 This section further sets out the division of transport powers, functions, and responsibilities between the governing body and local boards ( see also sections 15 and 16 ). 2 The governing body may exercise or perform the transport powers, functions, and responsibilities of the Auckland Council, except those conferred on the local boards as set out in section 47C . 2A The powers of the governing body in relation to bylaws and resolutions for the purposes of section 22AB of the Land Transport Act 1998 are subject to section 47D . 3 If sections 47A to 47D are inconsistent with Part 2 , then sections 47A to 47D (as the case may be) prevail. 47B Governing body and local boards must consider certain matters when exercising powers, etc 1 In exercising or performing the powers, functions, and responsibilities specified in sections 47A to 47D , the governing body or local board (as the case may be) must have regard to— a the transport of freight through the affected area; and b frequently running public transport networks in the affected area. 2 In exercising or performing its powers, functions, and responsibilities specified in sections 47A to 47D , a local board must do so in a manner that does not obstruct regionally significant transport projects and services (including, but not limited to, those projects and services specified in Auckland’s regional land transport plan or regional public transport plan). 3 See also sections 97 to 99 , which relate to disputes between the governing body and local boards in respect of compliance with subsection (2) . 47C Powers of local boards in respect of transport matters 1 A local board has the powers, functions, and responsibilities as specified in Schedule 4 in relation to local roads and collector roads within its local board area. 2 Unless this section specifies otherwise, a local board exercising or performing a power, function, or responsibility specified in Schedule 4 may do so in the same manner, subject to the same restrictions and requirements, and with the same effect as if the power, function, or responsibility were directly conferred on it by the relevant provision. 3 In exercising the powers, performing the functions, and carrying out the responsibilities specified in Schedule 4 , a local board must collaborate and co-operate with 1 or more other local boards in the situations where the interests and preferences of communities within each local board area will be better served by doing so. 4 The Governor-General may, by Order in Council, do any of the following on the recommendation of the Minister of Transport: a insert a power, function, or responsibility into Schedule 4 : b amend or revoke a power, function, or responsibility set out in Schedule 4 . 5 The Minister of Transport must not make a recommendation for the purposes of subsection (4) unless the recommendation is with the concurrence of the Auckland Council. 6 An order under subsection (4) — a is secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements); and b must include a statement of the reasons for the making of the order. 47D Division of responsibility in relation to bylaws under section 22AB of Land Transport Act 1998 1 This section applies to the Auckland Council for the purposes of making a bylaw or resolution under section 22AB of the Land Transport Act 1998. 2 For the Auckland Council to make a bylaw, the governing body and a majority of local boards must agree to the making of the bylaw. 4 In respect of the making of a bylaw under subsection (2) , a local board must notify the governing body, in writing, of whether the local board agrees to the making of the bylaw within a reasonable time specified by the governing body. 6 For the purposes of section 22AB(3) of the Land Transport Act 1998, a reference to a road controlling authority is to be read as follows: a in respect of a bylaw under any of the following provisions of the Land Transport Act 1998, as if it were a reference to a local board in relation to local roads and collector roads within its local board area: i section 22AB(1)(e) to (h): ii section 22AB(1)(m) and (n): iii section 22AB(1)(o), to the extent that it provides for the making of resolutions in relation to the use of parking places for the purposes set out in section 22AB(1)(o)(i), (ii), (iii)(A), (iv), and (v): iv section 22AB(1)(q) to (v): iva section 22AB(1)(z): v section 22AB(1)(zc): vi section 22AB(1)(zi): b in any other case, as if it were a reference to the governing body. 7 For the purposes of making a resolution to limit a parking place, or any specified part of that parking place, under section 22AB(3A) of the Land Transport Act 1998, a reference to a relevant road controlling authority is to be read as if it were a reference to a local board in relation to local roads and collector roads within its local board area. Miscellaneous provisions 48 Council must develop Auckland Roading Classification Framework 1 The Auckland Council must develop, approve, and maintain the Auckland Roading Classification Framework (the Roading Framework ). 2 The Roading Framework must classify a road, other than a State highway, within Auckland as— a an arterial road, being a road that carries a significant volume of— i traffic; or ii freight; or iii public transport; or b a local road, being— i a road that collects and distributes traffic to and from properties within a specific area; or ii a road that— A is, or is on land that is, under the control of the Auckland Council; and B is contemplated to be in the remit of decision making by local boards; or c a collector road, being a road that distributes traffic between local roads and arterial roads; or d a city centre road, being a road that is within the Auckland city centre ( see subsection (3) ); or e an Eden Park precinct road, being a road that is within the Eden Park precinct ( see subsection (3) ); or f a residual road, being a road that— i is, or is on land that is, under the control of the Auckland Council; and ii is contemplated to be in the remit of decision making by the governing body. 3 In addition to classifying roads under subsection (2) , the Roading Framework must also specify— a the area that is the Auckland city centre; and b the area that is the Eden Park precinct. 4 Before the Auckland Council approves or varies the Roading Framework,— a the Auckland Council must consult the transport CCO on the Roading Framework or variation to it (as the case may be); and b the Minister of Transport must approve the Roading Framework or variation to it (as the case may be). 4A In this section, road has the meaning set out in section 2(1) of the Land Transport Act 1998. 5 The Roading Framework made under this section is secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). 48A Auckland Council’s review of performance of transport functions, etc 1 The Auckland Council must,— a 5 years after the date on which this subpart commences (the review date ), review the following in respect of the performance of their powers, functions, and responsibilities under this Part: i the Auckland Council (including the governing body and local boards): ii the transport CCO; and b within 9 months after the review date, prepare a report on that review. 2 Before completing the report, the Auckland Council must consult any person the Council considers appropriate. 3 As soon as practicable after the Auckland Council has completed the report,— a the Council must present the report to the Minister of Transport; and b the Minister of Transport must present the report to the House of Representatives. 15 Section 91 amended (Council may impose additional accountability requirements on substantive council-controlled organisations) In section 91(2), replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . 16 Section 93 amended (Councillors and local board members prohibited from appointment as directors of substantive council-controlled organisations) Replace section 93(2) with: 2 However, section 45(4) prevails in relation to an appointment of a director of the transport CCO. 17 Section 95 amended (Council may appoint chairperson and deputy chairperson of substantive council-controlled organisation) Replace section 95(2) with: 2 However, the Council must not appoint any of the persons specified in section 45(4)(a) to (d) as the chairperson or deputy chairperson of the transport CCO. 17A Section 97 amended (Disputes about allocation of decision-making responsibilities or proposed bylaws) In the heading to section 97, replace responsibilities or proposed bylaws with responsibilities, proposed bylaws, or transport matters . In section 97(1)(b), replace 24(3)(b) or 27(3)(b) with 150B(3)(b) or 150E(3)(b) of the Local Government Act 2002 . After section 97(1)(b), insert: c the governing body is dissatisfied with a local board’s compliance with section 47B(2) in respect of a decision made by the local board. Replace section 97(3) with: 3 If, after acting under subsection (2), the dispute is still unresolved,— a in the case of a dispute to which subsection (1)(a) or (b) relates, the local board or boards concerned may apply, in writing, to the Local Government Commission for a binding determination on the matter: b in the case of a dispute to which subsection (1)(c) relates, the governing body may apply, in writing, to the Local Government Commission for a binding determination on the matter. In section 97(4), replace local board or boards with applicant or applicants . 17B Section 98 amended (Local Government Commission to determine disputes) Replace section 98(1) and (2) with: 1 As soon as practicable after receiving an application under section 97(3) , the Local Government Commission must notify the following persons of the application and request them to provide, within 7 days, copies of all reports, correspondence, and other information held by them that is relevant to the matter: a the mayor: b the Council’s chief executive: c in the case of an application made under section 97(3)(b) , the local board or boards concerned. 2 After receiving the information specified under subsection (1) , the Commission must— a consider that information and the information provided in the application under section 97(4) ; and b determine the matter, having regard to— i the requirements of this Act; and ii in the case of an application made under section 97(3)(a) , the current and future well-being of the communities of Auckland, and the interests and preferences of the communities within each affected local board area; and iii in the case of an application made under section 97(3)(b) , whether the disputed decision obstructs the regionally significant transport projects or services concerned ( see section 47B(2) ); and iv any other matter that the Commission considers on reasonable grounds to be relevant. 18 Section 100 amended (Development contributions for transport infrastructure) In section 100(1), replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . 19 Schedule 1AA amended In Schedule 1AA,— a insert the Part set out in Schedule 1 of this Act as the last Part; and b make all necessary consequential amendments. 20 New Schedules 3 and 4 inserted After Schedule 2, insert the Schedules 3 and 4 set out in Schedule 2 of this Act. 21 Consequential amendments Amend the legislation specified in Schedule 3 as set out in that schedule. 1 New Part 3 inserted into Schedule 1AA 3 Provisions relating to Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Act 2025 3 Interpretation In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,— additional powers and functions means the powers and functions of the transport CCO that are— a set out in clause 7(1) ; but b not functions or powers of the transport CCO under Part 4 of the new Act affected employee means an employee of Auckland Transport immediately before the commencement date amendment Act means the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Act 2025 Auckland Transport bylaws means the following bylaws made by either or both Auckland Transport and the Auckland Council: a Activities in the Road Corridor Bylaw 2022: b Auckland Council and Auckland Transport Te Ture ā-Rohe mo nga Tohu 2022 / Signs Bylaw 2022: c Auckland Transport and Auckland Council Te Ture ā-Rohe mō te Whakamahinga me te Whakatūnga Waka 2025 | Vehicle Use and Parking Bylaw 2025: d Auckland Transport Speed Limits Bylaw 2019 commencement date means the date on which the amendment Act comes into force KiwiRail has the meaning set out in section 5(1) of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 new Act means this Act as in force immediately on and after the commencement date New Zealand Transport Agency has the meaning set out in section 37(1) old Act means this Act as in force immediately before the commencement date transition director means the person appointed under clause 11 transition plan means the plan approved by the governing body of the Auckland Council under clause 12 transitional period means the period beginning on the commencement date and ending on the earlier of the following: a the date that is 6 months after the commencement date: b the date on which the transport CCO has stopped performing or exercising all additional powers and functions in accordance with a direction made under clause 7(2) . Procedural matters relating to transitional period 3A Subpart 1 of Part 6 of the Local Government Act 2002 to not apply in respect of transitional matters 1 During the transitional period, the Auckland Council is not required to comply with the obligations and responsibilities set out in subpart 1 of Part 6 of the Local Government Act 2002 in respect of the exercise of powers, performance of functions, and making of decisions (the specified actions ) that are necessary to give effect to the transition from the old Act to the new Act. 2 The specified actions include, but are not limited to, those required to amend the LTP, such as for the purposes of clause 7A (for example, use of the special consultative procedure in accordance with sections 93A to 93G of the Local Government Act 2002). Establishment of ARTC 4 Appointment of members The persons responsible for appointing the members of the ARTC in accordance with sections 38D to 38F must make those appointments within the period of 3 months after the commencement date. 5 Performance of functions during establishment 1 During the period between the commencement date and every person responsible for appointing the members of the ARTC making those appointments, the functions of the ARTC must be performed by the permanent advisors. 2 During the period referred to in subclause (1) , a reference in the Land Transport Management Act 2003 to something that is done by or in relation to the ARTC must be read as a reference to something that is done by or in relation to the permanent advisors. 3 Subclauses (1) and (2) cease to have effect when either of the following events occur: a every person responsible for appointing the members of the ARTC has made those appointments: b the period referred to in clause 4 expires. First 30-year transport plan for Auckland 6 First 30-year transport plan for Auckland The ARTC must complete the first 30-year transport plan for Auckland on or before the date set by the Minister of Transport and the mayor. Functions and powers of transport CCO and Auckland Council during transitional period 7 Transport CCO has additional powers and functions during transitional period 1 For the transitional period, the transport CCO has the functions and powers of Auckland Transport under sections 45 and 46 of the old Act, except the functions and powers under the following provisions of the old Act: a section 45(a): b section 46(1)(g) to the extent that it relates to the power to make a bylaw under Part 3 of the Land Transport Act 1998 ( see clause 13(4) ): c section 46(1)(h) to the extent that it relates to the power to make a bylaw under subparts 1 and 2 of Part 8 of the Local Government Act 2002: d section 46(1)(i): e section 46(1)(j) to the extent it relates to the preparation of a regional public transport plan under sections 117 to 129 of the Land Transport Management Act 2003. 2 During the transitional period, in respect of an additional power or function,— a the Auckland Council may direct the transport CCO to stop exercising that power or performing that function; and b if the Auckland Council makes that direction, this clause no longer applies to that power or function. 3 During the transitional period, the transport CCO must— a co-operate with the transition director for the purposes of the development of the transition plan; and b for that purpose, disclose information to the transition director upon request as soon as practicable. 4 To the extent that a function or power of the transport CCO under subclause (1) conflicts with those of the Auckland Council in Part 4 of the new Act, this Part prevails until a direction in respect of that function or power is made under subclause (2) . 7A Auckland Council must specify public transport activities by end of transitional period For the purposes of complying with section 45C of the new Act, the Auckland Council must specify, in the LTP, the public transport activities before the end of the transitional period. 8 Transfer of requiring authority status from transport CCO to Auckland Council 1 On the transfer date, the Auckland Council is treated as the requiring authority in relation to any matter for which the transport CCO is the requiring authority immediately before the transfer date, for the purposes of Part 8 of the Resource Management Act 1991. 2 In this clause, transfer date means the date that is the earlier of the following: a the date on which the Auckland Council directs the transport CCO, under clause 7(2) , to stop performing its function under section 45(b)(ii) of the old Act: b the end of the transitional period. 9 Interim governing body of transport CCO during transitional period 1 On or after the commencement date, the Auckland Council must— a appoint at least 3, but no more than 5, directors as the governing body of the transport CCO for the purposes of section 45 for the duration of the transitional period (the interim board ); and b in respect of the governing body of Auckland Transport under section 43 of the old Act (the old board ), notify directors of the old board immediately before the commencement date that the interim board has replaced the old board. 2 During the transitional period, the interim board must— a take all reasonable steps to ensure that the transition from the old Act to the new Act is efficient and effective; and b ensure that the transport CCO performs its functions and exercises its powers in accordance with clause 7 ; and c comply with a direction by the Auckland Council under this Act, including under clause 7(2) . 3 Before the end of the transitional period, the Auckland Council must appoint the members of the governing body of the transport CCO under section 45 , including its chairperson and deputy chairperson, to replace the interim board, irrespective of whether the members to be appointed are members of the interim board. 10 Auckland Council must develop Auckland Roading Classification Framework The Auckland Council must develop the Auckland Roading Classification Framework under section 48 before the end of the transitional period. 10A Transfer of status of Auckland Transport as airport authority 1 During the transitional period, a reference to Auckland Transport in the Airport Authorities (Auckland Transport) Order 2020 is to be read as a reference to the transport CCO. 2 On and after the date on which the transitional period ends, a reference to Auckland Transport in the Airport Authorities (Auckland Transport) Order 2020 is to be read as a reference to the Auckland Council. 3 This clause overrides section 3(4) of the Airport Authorities Act 1966. Transition plan for Auckland Council and transport CCO 11 Auckland Council must appoint transition director On or as soon as practicable after the commencement date, the chief executive of the Auckland Council must appoint a person to prepare the transition plan (the transition director ). 12 Transition director must develop transition plan 1 The transition director must prepare a transition plan that sets out— a the strategy for, and the timing of, the transition between the old Act and the new Act in relation to the respective functions of the Auckland Council and the transport CCO; and b the status of the roles of affected employees as determined by the transition director under clause 21(1) . 2 The transition plan must be approved by,— a in respect of the matters set out in subclause (1)(a) , the governing body of the Auckland Council; and b in respect of the matters set out in subclause (1)(b) , the chief executive of the Auckland Council. Saving and transition of Auckland Transport instruments and assets 13 Saving of Auckland Transport bylaws 1 On and after the commencement date, the Auckland Transport bylaws, and resolutions under those bylaws, continue in force and are treated as having been made by the Auckland Council. 2 However, before the end of the transitional period, the Auckland Council must, in accordance with clause 14 ,— a review all of the Auckland Transport bylaws; and b amend those bylaws. 3 Until the Auckland Transport bylaws are reviewed and amended under subclause (2) , in relation to the making of a resolution under section 22AB(3) of the Land Transport Act 1998,— a the Auckland Council must not make a resolution under an Auckland Transport bylaw; and b the transport CCO may make a resolution under an Auckland Transport bylaw as if it were a road controlling authority. 4 On and after the commencement date, the transport CCO must not— a make a bylaw under section 22AB of the Land Transport Act 1998; and b amend or revoke an Auckland Transport bylaw. 5 Until the Auckland Transport bylaws are reviewed and amended under subclause (2) , any reference in the Auckland Transport bylaws to— a Auckland Transport is to be read as if it were a reference to the transport CCO; and b the Auckland transport system is to be read as if it had the meaning given to it in section 37(1) of the old Act. 14 Review of Auckland Transport bylaws 1 This clause applies to the review and amendment of an Auckland Transport bylaw under clause 13(2) . 2 The review and amendment of the Auckland Transport bylaw must be limited to giving effect to the division of responsibilities between the governing body and local boards as set out in sections 47 to 47D , in particular,— a the status of the Auckland Council as the road controlling authority in Auckland ( see section 47 ); and b the division of responsibilities in relation to bylaws under section 22AB of the Land Transport Act 1998 ( see section 47D ). 3 The Auckland Council— a must review and amend the Auckland Transport bylaw in accordance with section 47D(2) and (4) and any requirements of the legislation under which the bylaw was made; but b is not required to comply with the following if the Council is satisfied that the amendment of the bylaw is limited to giving effect to sections 47 to 47D : i the consultation requirements under section 22AD of the Land Transport Act 1998: ii the requirements under section 155(1) and (2) of the Local Government Act 2002. 15 Saving and transition of Auckland Transport operating rules 1 This clause applies to operating rules made under section 49 of the old Act that are in force immediately before the commencement date. 2 On and after the commencement date, the operating rules continue in effect and are treated as having been made under section 46A by the Auckland Council for the transport CCO. 16 Saving and transition of policies and plans of Auckland Transport 1 This clause applies to a policy or plan made by Auckland Transport— a that is transport-related; and b that is in force immediately before the commencement date; and c irrespective of whether it is required or authorised by an enactment. 2 On and after the commencement date, a policy or plan continues in effect and is treated as having been made by the Auckland Council. 3 Before the end of the transitional period, the Auckland Council must— a review the policy or plan; and b retain, amend, or revoke the policy or plan. 4 However, any review or amendment of a policy or plan under subclause (3) may be limited to giving effect to the division of responsibilities between the governing body and local boards as set out in sections 47 to 47D . 16A Transition of Auckland Council delegations to Auckland Transport 1 This clause applies to a delegation that— a was made by the Auckland Council to Auckland Transport under the old Act or any other enactment; and b is in force immediately before the commencement date. 2 On and after the commencement date, the delegation continues in force until revoked. 17 Transition of New Zealand Transport Agency delegations to Auckland Transport 1 This clause applies to a delegation that— a was made under an enactment to Auckland Transport by the New Zealand Transport Agency or the Director (as defined in section 5(1) of the Land Transport Management Act 2003); and b is in force immediately before the commencement date. 2 On and after the commencement date, the delegation continues in force until revoked. 3 Before the end of the transitional period, the New Zealand Transport Agency or the Director (as the case may be)— a must review the delegation; and b may amend or revoke the delegation. 18 Saving of delegations by Auckland Transport 1 This clause applies to a delegation made under section 54 of the old Act that is in force immediately before the commencement date. 2 If the delegation is to a committee or an employee of Auckland Transport, the delegation continues in effect and is treated as having been made to a committee or employee of the transport CCO, as the case may be, under section 44A . 3 If the delegation is to the Auckland Council or any other person not specified in subclause (2) , the delegation continues in effect, and is treated as having been made by the transport CCO, until the earlier of the following: a the date on which the transport CCO revokes the delegation: b the end of the transitional period. 4 Despite subclauses (2) and (3) , if the delegation relates to a function of the ARTC, the delegation is revoked on the commencement date. 19 Saving of statutory warrants and appointments in relation to Auckland Transport employees 1 This clause applies to a warrant issued to, or an appointment of, an affected employee— a under— i section 177 of the Local Government Act 2002; or ia section 128D of the Land Transport Act 1998; or ii section 208 of the Land Transport Act 1998; and b in force immediately before the commencement date. 2 On and after the commencement date, the warrant or appointment continues in force until revoked. 20 Continuity and transfer of Auckland Transport’s assets, contracts, etc 1 On the commencement date,— a all assets that were owned by Auckland Transport immediately before the commencement date remain in the ownership of the transport CCO; and b all relevant matters of, or in the name of, Auckland Transport remain the relevant matters of, or in the name of, the transport CCO. 2 On the date that is the end of the transitional period (the transfer date ), except as provided in any Order in Council made under clause 20A ,— a all assets that were owned by the transport CCO immediately before the transfer date are vested in the Auckland Council; and b all relevant matters of, or in the name of, the transport CCO become the relevant matters of, or in the name of, the Auckland Council. 2A On and after the transfer date, a reference to Auckland Transport or the transport CCO in an instrument or any other document relating to a matter referred to in subclause (2)(a) or (b) must be read as a reference to the Auckland Council (subject to clause 20A(1A) and any Order in Council made under clause 20A(1) ). 3 In this clause and clause 20A , relevant matters — a means rights, liabilities, contracts, entitlements, undertakings, engagements, regulatory consents, and any other thing; and b includes resource consents, designations, and notices of requirement issued under the Resource Management Act 1991. 20A Transfer of assets, contracts, etc, to other entity by Order in Council 1 The Governor-General may, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Transport,— a disapply clause 20(2) and (2A) in respect of— i a specified asset owned by the transport CCO: ii a specified relevant matter of, or in the name of, the transport CCO: b vest a specified asset owned by the transport CCO in the New Zealand Transport Agency or KiwiRail: c specify a relevant matter of, or in the name of, the transport CCO as a relevant matter of, or in the name of, the New Zealand Transport Agency or KiwiRail. 1A On and after the date that an Order in Council for the purposes of subclause (1)(b) or (c) comes into force, a reference to Auckland Transport or the transport CCO in an instrument or any other document relating to a matter vested or specified under subclause (1)(b) or (c) must be read as a reference to the New Zealand Transport Agency or KiwiRail (as the case may be). 2 Before making a recommendation for the purposes of subclause (1) , the Minister of Transport must consult the transition director. 3 An order made under subclause (1) — a must come into force no later than the date on which the transitional period ends; and b is secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). Transfer of Auckland Transport employees and related matters 21 Duties to identify employees and provide employee information 1 The transition director must determine the role of each affected employee as one of the following: a a role that the Auckland Council requires to carry out its functions under the new Act ( see clauses 22 and 23 of this schedule): b a role that the transport CCO requires to carry out its functions under the new Act: c a role that the Auckland Council and the transport CCO do not require to carry out their respective functions under the new Act. 2 The transport CCO must provide employee information to the Auckland Council (including the transition director) if the transition director is satisfied that the information is reasonably necessary to enable— a the transition director to determine to whom offers of employment should be made under clause 22(2) ; and b the chief executive of the Auckland Council to make offers of employment under clause 22(2) . 3 In this clause, employee information includes (without limitation) the following information in relation to an affected employee: a the employee’s employment agreement, remuneration, accrued leave entitlements, superannuation scheme benefits, and any service-related benefits and entitlements: entitlements; and b any employment policies that are part of the employee’s conditions of employment; and c records relating to the employee’s performance as an employee of the transport CCO; and d records relating to any disciplinary or misconduct matters against the employee. 22 Employment of affected employees by Auckland Council 1 This clause applies in respect of any affected employee who is determined under clause 21(1)(a) to be required by the Auckland Council to carry out its functions under the new Act. 2 The chief executive of the Auckland Council may offer equivalent employment to the affected employee, being employment that is— a the same or substantially similar in role and duties to the affected employee’s existing position; and b on terms and conditions that, overall, are no less favourable than those applying to the employee immediately before the date on which the offer of employment is made to the employee,— i including, without limitation, terms and conditions in relation to the employee’s base remuneration and any service-related, redundancy, or superannuation conditions; but ii excluding any existing framework relating to performance-based or other discretionary remuneration that applies to the employee; and c on terms that treat the period of service with the transport CCO (and every other period of service recognised by the transport CCO as continuous service) as if it were continuous service with the Auckland Council. 3 If the affected employee accepts an offer of employment under subclause (2) , the employee’s employment by the Auckland Council is to be treated as continuous employment, including for the purpose of service-related entitlements, whether legislative or otherwise. 4 An affected employee who is offered employment under subclause (2) is not entitled to receive any contractual notice or any payment, benefit, or compensation from the transport CCO or the Auckland Council on the grounds that— a the affected employee’s position in the transport CCO has ceased to exist, whether or not the employee accepts the offer; or b the person has ceased to be an employee of the transport CCO as a result of the employee’s employment by the Auckland Council. 5 The employment of an affected employee To avoid doubt, if the affected employee accepts an offer of employment under subclause (2) , the employee’s employment by the Auckland Council does not— a constitute new employment, including for the purposes of the Holidays Act 2003 or the KiwiSaver Act 2006 or any service-related entitlements or benefits (whether legislative or otherwise); or b treat that employee as a new employee for the purposes of the Employment Relations Act 2000 . 6 This clause overrides— a Part 6A of the Employment Relations Act 2000; and b any employee protection provision in any relevant employment agreement. 23 Transfer of other employment rights, duties, liabilities, or obligations of transport CCO on change of employer 1 This clause applies to any other rights, duties, liabilities, or obligations of the transport CCO (including in relation to any holiday and leave entitlements under the Holidays Act 2003 )— a relating to an affected employee who becomes an employee of the Auckland Council under clause 22 ; and b that existed immediately before the date on which the employee became an employee of the Auckland Council. 2 The rights, duties, liabilities, and obligations referred to in subclause (1) vest in the Auckland Council on the date on which the employee becomes an employee of the Auckland Council. 2 New Schedules 3 and 4 inserted 3 s 40A Conflicts of interest 1 When interests must be disclosed 1 In this schedule, matter means the ARTC’s performance of its functions set out in section 38A . 2 A member of the ARTC is interested in a matter if they— a may derive a financial benefit from the matter; or b are the spouse, civil union partner, de facto partner, child, or parent of a person who may derive a financial benefit from the matter; or c may have a financial interest in a person to whom the matter relates; or d are a partner, director, officer, board member, or trustee of a person who may have a financial interest in a person to whom the matter relates; or e are otherwise directly or indirectly interested in the matter. 3 However, a member is not interested in a matter— a because they receive remuneration or expenses authorised under this Act or another Act; or b if their interest is so remote or insignificant that it cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to influence them in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act or the Land Transport Management Act 2003; or c only because they have past or current involvement in the relevant sector, industry, or practice. 2 Obligation to disclose interest 1 A member who is interested in a matter must disclose details of the interest in accordance with clause 3 as soon as practicable after the member becomes aware that they are interested. 2 A general notice of an interest in a matter or a possible future matter that is disclosed in accordance with clause 3 is a standing disclosure of that interest for the purposes of this clause. 3 A standing disclosure ceases to have effect if the nature of the interest materially alters or the extent of the interest materially increases. 3 Who disclosure of interests must be made to 1 The member must disclose details of the interest in an interests register kept by the ARTC. 2 The ARTC must provide a copy of the interests register to the Minister of Transport and the mayor at least every 3 months. 4 What must be disclosed The details that must be disclosed under clause 3 are— a the nature of the interest and the monetary value of the interest (if the monetary value can be quantified); or b the nature and extent of the interest (if the monetary value cannot be quantified). 5 Consequences of being interested in matter A member who is interested in a matter— a must not vote or take part in any discussion or decision relating to the matter, or otherwise participate in any activity that relates to the matter; and b must not sign any document relating to the initiation of the matter; and c is to be disregarded for the purpose of forming a quorum (if a quorum is required by standing orders) for that part of a meeting during which a discussion or decision relating to the matter occurs or is made. 6 Consequences of failing to disclose interest 1 The ARTC must notify the Minister of Transport and the mayor of a failure to comply with clause 2 or 5 , and of the acts affected, as soon as practicable after becoming aware of the failure. 2 A failure to comply with clause 2 or 5 does not affect the validity of an act or matter. 3 However, subclause (2) does not limit the right of any person to apply, in accordance with law, for judicial review. 7 Permission to act despite being interested in matter 1 The chairperson may, by making an entry in the interests register, permit 1 or more members, or members with a specified class of interest, to do anything otherwise prohibited by clause 5 if the chairperson is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so. 2 The permission may state conditions that the member must comply with. 3 If there is no chairperson, or if the chairperson is unavailable or interested, the permission may be given jointly by the Minister of Transport and the mayor. 4 The permission may be amended or revoked in the same way as it may be given. 8 ARTC may avoid certain acts done in breach of conflict of interest rules 1 The ARTC may avoid a natural person act done by the ARTC in respect of which a member was in breach of clause 5 . 2 However, the act may be avoided only within 3 months after the affected act is disclosed to the Minister of Transport and the mayor under clause 6 . 3 If an affected act is disclosed to the Minister of Transport and the mayor at different times, the 3-month period is calculated by reference to the earlier disclosure. 4 An act in which a member is interested can be avoided on the ground of the member’s interest only in accordance with this clause. 4 s 47C Local boards’ powers, functions, and responsibilities in relation to local roads and collector roads in Auckland The following table is medium in size and has 3 columns. Column 1 is headed Provision. Column 2 is headed Description. Column 3 is headed Exclusions. Provision Description Exclusions Government Roading Powers Act 1989: Section 54(2)(a) to (c) and (3) Functions and responsibilities of a controlling authority in relation to the removal of a structure Section 55(2)(a) to (f) Powers of a responsible authority in relation to an owner or occupier of any land adjoining a road or public work Section 96(1) Administration of a limited access road passed to a territorial authority Local Government Act 1974: Section 319(1)(a) Power to construct, upgrade, and repair a road to the extent that it is a cycle track Power to construct, upgrade, or repair a road to the extent that it is not a cycle track Section 319(1)(f) Power to determine what part of a road must be a carriageway, footpath, or cycle track Section 319(1)(j) Power to name and to alter the name of any road and to place a plate bearing the name of the road on any building or erection on, or abutting on, the road Section 331 Power to form or upgrade footpaths Power to impose a charge under section 331(1) Section 332 Power to form a public cycle track Power to take, purchase, or otherwise acquire land for the purpose of constructing the cycle track under section 332(2) Section 333(1) and (2) Powers of a council in relation to constructing, erecting, growing, altering, or removing the specified devices on, or from, any road Section 334(1)(b) Power to lay out or plant grass plots, flower beds, or trees on a road and prohibit traffic on those plots or flower beds Section 334(1)(c) Power to erect a monument, statue, or other erection Section 334(1)(d) Power to construct or provide facilities on, over, or under any road (for the purposes specified in that provision) Section 336(1) Powers relating to pedestrian malls Section 341(1)(a) Power to grant a lease of, or any part of, the airspace above the surface of a road Section 346A Power to declare a road to be a limited access road and to revoke the status of a road as a limited access road Section 355(1) and (9) Powers of a council in relation to removal, etc, of objects Section 591(1)(d) Power to authorise any part of a road for use as a parking place Schedule 10, clauses 11(e), 11A, and 11B Power to close a road to traffic and associated powers and responsibilities of a council Land Transport Rule: Setting of Speed Limits 2024: All Powers and responsibilities of a territorial authority that is a road controlling authority in relation to speed limits (including speed limits around schools and temporary speed limits) Land Transport Rule: Street Layouts 2023: Clauses 2.1 to 2.3 Powers and responsibilities of a road controlling authority in relation to a roadway within its control Section 3 Powers and responsibilities of a road controlling authority in relation to installing pilots Section 4 Powers and responsibilities of a road controlling authority in relation to authorising a community street Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004: Clause 6.2(2) Power to install additional traffic signals Clause 6.4(21) Power to install temporary traffic signals Section 7 Power to provide traffic control devices Clause 8.2(1) and (2) Power to mark a pedestrian crossing on a road Clause 8.3(1) and (3) Power to authorise, and to withdraw the authorisation of, the Board of Trustees of a school to appoint persons as members of school patrols Clause 8.4 Power to provide a school crossing point Clause 10.6 Power to mark a road surface to indicate the area that a road user must not enter when the road user’s intended passage through that area is blocked by traffic Clause 11.4(4) Power to install facilities for the parking, standing, or storage of specified things Clause 12.4 Designation of an area of road as a loading zone, reserved parking, or time-restricted parking Transport (Vehicular Traffic Road Closure) Regulations 1965: Regulation 3 Power to close a road 3 Conflicts of interest 4 Local boards’ powers, functions, and responsibilities in relation to local roads and collector roads in Auckland 3 Consequential amendments In section 5(1), replace the definition of Auckland Council with: Auckland Council means the unitary authority established by section 6 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 In section 5(1), insert in their appropriate alphabetical order: Auckland Regional Transport Committee or ARTC means the Auckland Regional Transport Committee established by section 38 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 transport CCO has the meaning given under section 4(1) of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 In section 5(1), repeal the definition of Auckland Transport . In section 5(1), definition of public road controlling authority , repeal paragraph (c). In section 5(1), definition of regional council , replace paragraph (b) with: b when used in— i Parts 2 to 4, includes a unitary authority: ii Part 5, includes— A a unitary authority: B any territorial authority to which the regional council has transferred the functions, powers, and duties of a regional council under that Part In section 5(1), replace the definition of regional transport committee with: regional transport committee means a regional transport committee established under section 105 In section 5(1), replace the definition of road controlling authority with: road controlling authority , in relation to a road, means the Minister, department of State, Crown entity, State enterprise, or territorial authority that controls the road Replace section 13(2) with: 2 Every 6 financial years, Auckland Council, in the case of Auckland, must— a ensure that the ARTC prepares, on Auckland Council’s behalf, a regional land transport plan; and b approve the Auckland regional land transport plan by a date appointed by the Agency. In section 14, replace or Auckland Transport (as the case may be) for approval, the regional transport committee with for approval, or before the ARTC submits a regional land transport plan to Auckland Council for approval, the regional transport committee or the ARTC . After section 14, insert: 15 Additional requirements for Auckland regional land transport plan Before the ARTC submits a regional land transport plan to Auckland Council for approval, the ARTC must— a have regard to the Auckland Council’s long-term plan under the Local Government Act 2002; and b have regard to any consultation document prepared and adopted by Auckland Council under section 93A of the Local Government Act 2002 if— i Auckland Council is in the process of using the special consultative procedure in relation to the adoption or amendment of a long-term plan under the Local Government Act 2002; and ii the long-term plan has not yet been adopted or the amendment has not yet been made; and c have regard to any Auckland Council transport policy statement that has been approved by the governing body of Auckland Council; and d ensure that the regional land transport plan is consistent with the 30-year transport plan for Auckland approved under section 42 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. In section 16(3)(a), delete for regions other than Auckland, . Repeal section 16(3)(b). In section 16(3)(c), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . Replace section 16(3)(c)(i) with: i activities proposed by approved organisations in the region, other than those activities specified in paragraph (a); and In section 16(3)(d), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . In section 16(5)(a), after committees , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . In section 16(5)(b), after committee, , insert or, in the case of Auckland, by the ARTC . In section 16(6)(g), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, by the ARTC . In section 18(1), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . Replace section 18(2) with: 2 Before the ARTC consults the public under subsection (1), it must consult both the governing body of Auckland Council and each affected local board of the Council. In section 18A(2), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . Repeal section 18A(3). In section 18A(4), replace Auckland Transport with The ARTC . In section 18B, after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC in each place. Repeal section 18C. In section 18CA, after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC in each place. In section 18D(1), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . In section 18D(2), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . In section 18D(2)(b), after committee’s , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC’s . Repeal section 18D(3). In section 18D(4), replace Auckland Transport with the ARTC . In section 18D(7), delete or Auckland Transport . In section 18E(2), after committee , insert or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . Repeal section 18E(7). In section 18F(1), delete or Auckland Transport (as the case may require) . Repeal section 18F(1)(a)(v). Repeal section 18F(2). In section 18G, delete , the Auckland Council, in each place. After section 19B(b)(v), insert: vi 30-year transport plan for Auckland. In section 19D(2), replace Auckland Transport with the ARTC . In section 23(4), replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . In section 26(da), replace Auckland Transport’s with the transport CCO’s . In section 35, replace Auckland Transport with the ARTC . In section 38AA(2), replace Auckland Transport with the ARTC, the transport CCO . In section 38AA(2), replace the Auckland transport system with land transport in Auckland . Repeal section 38AA(3). After section 67(1)(b)(ii), insert: iii any 30-year transport plan for Auckland; and Replace section 103(8) with: 8 Before making a declaration under subsection (1) or varying or revoking a declaration under subsection (4), the Agency must consult any regional council or territorial authority that may be affected by the proposed declaration, variation, or revocation and, if the road concerned is within a project area for a specified development project, the Agency must also consult Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities. In section 105(9), delete or Auckland Transport and 1 or more adjoining regional councils . Repeal section 105(9A)(d). Replace section 105(9C) with: 9C The chair and deputy chair of a joint regional transport committee established under subsection (9) must both be persons who represent a regional council. Repeal section 105(10A). Repeal section 105A(1)(a). In section 106(1), delete (other than the regional transport committee for Auckland) . In section 106(2), replace , including the regional transport committee for Auckland, with or, in the case of Auckland, the ARTC . In section 106(3)(c), delete or Auckland Transport (as the case may be) . In section 106(4), delete (including the regional transport committee for Auckland) . Repeal section 107(4). In section 108(3), delete or Auckland Transport . In section 108(4), delete or Auckland Transport . In section 109B(7), definition of specified agency , paragraph (a), replace Auckland Transport with the ARTC . Repeal section 114. Replace section 121(1)(c)(i)(G) with: G in the case of a plan or a variation adopted by the Auckland Council, the ARTC; and In section 125(1)(a), replace Auckland Transport with the Auckland Council . In section 125(1)(b)(i), replace (but Auckland Transport must consult the Auckland Council and each affected local board of the Auckland Council) with (but the Auckland Council must consult the ARTC) . Repeal sections 128(3) and (4). In section 129(1), delete or the Auckland Council . Repeal section 129(1)(e). In Schedule 2, first item relating to Auckland Transport, first column, replace Auckland Transport with Auckland Council . In Schedule 2, second item relating to Auckland Transport, first column, replace Auckland Transport with Auckland Council . In Schedule 2, third item relating to Auckland Transport, first column, replace Auckland Transport with Auckland Council . Repeal section 6(2)(a)(ii). In section 6(3), replace and Auckland Transport have the meanings with has the meaning . Repeal section 42(4). In section 2(1), definition of local authority , replace paragraph (b)(vii) and (viii) with: vii the transport CCO (as continued by section 43 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009): Repeal section 62(7). In section YA 1 , definition of council-controlled organisation , paragraph (b), replace Auckland Transport (as established by section 38 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009) or Auckland Regional Holdings (as established by section 18 of the Local Government (Auckland) Amendment Act 2004 with the transport CCO (as continued by section 43 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009) . In section YA 1 , definition of local authority , replace paragraph (b)(vii) and (viii) with: vii the transport CCO (as continued by section 43 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009): After section 22AB(5), insert: 5A See section 47D of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009, which relates to the making of bylaws and resolutions by the Auckland Council under this section. In section 4, new section 65A, definition of enforcement authority , paragraph (c), delete (and, if the scheme is in Auckland, Auckland Transport) . In section 4, repeal new section 65E(1)(c). In section 4, new section 65H(2)(e) and (f), delete (and, if the scheme is in Auckland, Auckland Transport) . In section 4, new section 65I(2), delete and, if the scheme is in Auckland, Auckland Transport . In section 4, new section 65K(3), delete (and, if the scheme is in Auckland, Auckland Transport) . In section 4, repeal new section 65ZB(4)(b)(iv). In section 4, new section 65ZJ(1), delete (or, if the scheme is in Auckland, Auckland Transport) . In Schedule 10, after clause 17A(d), insert: e in the case of the Auckland Council, specify the activities that the transport CCO must undertake in accordance with section 45C of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. In section 23(6)(g), replace Auckland Transport with the transport CCO . In Schedule 1, Part 2, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: Auckland Regional Transport Committee and its permanent advisors In section 9, repeal the definition of Auckland Transport . In section 9, replace the definition of relevant territorial authority with: relevant territorial authority , in relation to a specified development project (or a project being assessed as a potential specified development project), means every territorial authority whose district includes land in the project area (or proposed project area) In section 142(1), repeal the definition of relevant territorial authority . Replace section 297(1) with: 1 This section applies if, in relation to a specified development project, the board of Kāinga Ora delegates any of its functions and powers to a local authority. In clause 1.4(1), revoke the definition of Auckland Transport . In clause 1.4(1), definition of territorial authority , paragraph (b), delete , Auckland Council or Auckland Transport . In clause 1.4(1), revoke the definition of Auckland Transport . In clause 1.4(1), definition of local authority , delete and also includes Auckland Transport . Replace clause 2(c) with: c the transport CCO (a body corporate continued by section 43 of the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009):

Hansard

April 28, 2026

Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill — Committee of the whole House · Full day report

Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill Committee of the whole House Debate resumed from 31 March. Part 1 Amendments to Parts 1 and 2 (continued) CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): Members, the House is in committee on the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill, the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Amendment Bill, the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (Supervisor, Levy, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill, the Regulatory Systems (Transport) Amendment Bill, the Ngāti Hei Claims Settlement Bill, and the Building and Construction Sector (Self-certification by Plumbers and Drainlayers) Amendment Bill. We come first to the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill. Members, when we were last considering the bill, we were debating Part 1. Part 1 is the debate on clauses 4 to 11, amendments to Parts 1 and 2 of the principal Act. The question is that Part 1 stand part. TANGI UTIKERE (Labour—Palmerston North) (15:39): Kia orana, Madam Chair. It’s great to be able to pick this particular bill back up. I think the Minister in the chair was the Mi…
Read full Hansard debate
Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill Committee of the whole House Debate resumed from 31 March. Part 1 Amendments to Parts 1 and 2 (continued) CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): Members, the House is in committee on the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill, the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Amendment Bill, the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (Supervisor, Levy, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill, the Regulatory Systems (Transport) Amendment Bill, the Ngāti Hei Claims Settlement Bill, and the Building and Construction Sector (Self-certification by Plumbers and Drainlayers) Amendment Bill. We come first to the Local Government (Auckland Council) (Transport Governance) Amendment Bill. Members, when we were last considering the bill, we were debating Part 1. Part 1 is the debate on clauses 4 to 11, amendments to Parts 1 and 2 of the principal Act. The question is that Part 1 stand part. TANGI UTIKERE (Labour—Palmerston North) (15:39): Kia orana, Madam Chair. It’s great to be able to pick this particular bill back up. I think the Minister in the chair was the Minister who was answering questions the last time we had this in front of us. One of the questions that I think, to be fair to the Minister, he did seek to address last time was around the disability access to long-term planning documents. Just keen to get the Minister’s reflections since we last raised this issue about whether there’s any change in that particular space. The Minister may recall this is a particular item that was changed as a result of submissions to the select committee from members of the disability community about ensuring that they were able to engage with the long-term planning prospects for Auckland City. I’ll just park that there for the Minister. I want to move on to the decision-making capacity that’s contained specifically in clauses 6 through to 11. A lot of what has been couched around this bill is the ability for the governing body and local boards to be able to either retain or, in some circumstances, actually gain, as a result of the changes that this bill will deliver, decision-making opportunities. Now, with decision making comes the framework for accountability, as well. There has been a little bit of ambiguity, perhaps, in the past, around where the responsibilities lie—who is responsible for making particular decisions? Now, when we look at the context of other transport decisions that are taken elsewhere around the country, there are regional land transport committees that, effectively, have representatives from across the region that make these decisions. Arena Williams: That’s good. TANGI UTIKERE: It’s a very good move. That’s a lot of the genesis behind this particular bill—is being able to introduce something similar, moving that away from the Auckland Transport model, across to responsibilities where elected members, or appointed members through ministerial appointees—and we’ll get to that in due course—are empowered to make those particular decisions. The first question in this area, for the Minister, is: whether he can explain to the committee how these particular clauses will seek to resolve what is, in some regards, longstanding ambiguity when it comes to the role of local boards in decision-making opportunities. Now, we all know—and those who are from Tāmaki-makau-rau, more than anyone else in this House, will know—that the local government arrangements for Auckland are, effectively, bespoke. There are no other parts of the country where there is this set-up. There are community boards elsewhere, but there are no local boards anywhere else in the country. Many of those local boards do have significant responsibilities—financial and otherwise—more so than other councils around the motu. The question for the Minister is: where is the comfort around that balance of local boards being involved in this decision-making opportunity but also striking the right balance in terms of, I guess, local autonomy, to be able to make those decisions as elected members, but also the accountability that they have? On the one hand, it’s fine to say, “Well, we’re going to give local boards this responsibility”—and some colleagues might have questions around where that responsibility actually lies and where the line is drawn, but there’s also an accountability aspect to that. Minister, is it that those decisions taken by local boards—they’d be held accountable every three years, through the ballot box, or is it in association with the annual and 10-year plan opportunities that exist for Auckland Council and the associated boards, or are there other accountability mechanisms that exist that either the public, the community, or the elected members could avail themselves of to ensure that they’re able to, effectively, deliver on that accountability frame? Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (15:43): Thank you, Madam Chair. I think the accountability question one is straightforward. Along with what the member has outlined, decisions by officials and elected representatives are always subject to judicial review—so if there’s anything that the local boards, councils are doing which would fall foul of natural justice, for example, or the empowering provisions of statute under which they are enabled to make those decisions, those decisions are reviewable through judicial review. ARENA WILLIAMS (Labour—Manurewa) (15:44): Thank you, Madam Chair. This clause 4 is really a lot of the impact of this bill, because it changes the status of local boards under the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009 and gives them much greater power. We need to really understand from the Minister what his policy programme is to make sure that Aucklanders have the right kind of say in local transport decisions if they’re being made at the local board level. I’m going to step through what this change, which is new section 4B, inserted by clause 5, means for the old section 12, with the Minister, because, say, the old section 12(3), says, “A local board does not have separate legal standing from the Auckland Council” and that the function there is that it’s not a local authority in and of itself. I’m asking this because, for decisions by Auckland Transport’s transport committee, for example, which makes hundreds of decisions every time it meets, I’m told, on a Friday, those decisions impact region-wide, if those powers are to be divested to the local boards, as this intends, then that will have a pretty significant impact on how local boards operate. That is the natural reading of his new clause 7, which amends section 12(4). The natural reading of this, and most submitters would think, is that what’s being devolved to local boards here is a new power to determine transport decisions, like where heavy trucks can park. Those decisions, at the moment, are made by local authorities, though, and that’s not what the bill actually says, because these local boards are not becoming a local authority, so they’re not empowered to make bylaws in the way that Auckland Council is at the moment—and its council-controlled organisations are—however, they will be empowered to be able to make those kinds of transport decisions. What I want to ask the Minister is about the outcome for citizens. If I am a resident in Manurewa, and I live across the road from Anderson Park—as the people I was doorknocking this weekend do—how do I now, under his new law, raise a complaint with Auckland Council that I want heavy vehicles not to be able to park there? Currently, they go to Auckland Council and they raise an issue, and it’s the transport committee at the Auckland Transport level that would make that decision. There are hundreds of decisions like this every week. If it is the local board that is empowered to do that, that makes more sense for the local residents—it makes more sense because they know those representatives and it is a representative who makes that decision. In what we are comparing it to in the old system, there is no elected member who sits on that current committee. Is it the case, now, that local boards will be empowered with that kind of decision, and, if it is, are they playing the role of a local authority? Have we got the empowering legislation right so that they can make decisions as if they are the local authority? If that is the case, then it’s fair to ask the Minister: how are we going to provide further resourcing for local boards to do that? Nothing in the legislation allows for provisions for Auckland Council to make that immediate, and yet, immediately, under law, these changes will have effect. How can the person on the street, raising this query with their local board, because now their local board are empowered to do so, under legislation, to make those rules, know who the person to talk to is? Because, actually, there is not a lady in the office who you can go and speak to about this, because they’re not provided to do that kind of work, they don’t make these decisions currently, and they are not local authorities, and yet this is a role that they will be provided with. This really gets to the nub of the problem about the Minister’s new clause 7. It allows for two things at once. It says that nothing in the provision will limit the ability of local boards to exercise that power, and yet they are limited from exercising that power because they’re not local authorities under the new law and they don’t have the resourcing to do it. Which is it, Minister, is it the old section 12, which says “A local board is not a local authority”, or is it the case that nothing now precludes them from playing the role of the local authority in decisions like that? There are several other kinds of decisions that I’ll ask the Minister to take us through, but this is the first and most obvious one that is not provided for in the law and it’s not clear at what level the local boards will be accountable to the people for these kinds of decisions and how they will undertake those kinds of decisions. Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (15:48): Thank you, Madam Chair. I think, regardless of whether there is a lady or a man in the office, any constituent who has questions about local transport policy, local roading policies, any of that stuff, they’ve got a number of avenues they can go to. They can go to their local board member, in the case of Auckland; they can go to their councillor, they can go to their MP, they could even write to the Minister and seek legislative change. There are plenty of avenues for locals to go and have a say, and, of course, every three years, they get to have a say at the ballot box. In terms of the crux of the question, local boards make decisions as though they are the local authority. They act as Auckland Council. That is outlined in clause 7, replacement section 12(4) “Nothing in this section limits—(a) the responsibility of a local board to make the decisions of the Auckland Council that are allocated to it in accordance with section 16:”. Section 16 of the Act is the “Decision-making responsibilities of local boards”, which set out what local boards are responsible and democratically accountable for, including carrying out responsibilities that comply with sections 76 to 82, identifying and developing bylaws specifically for local board areas, under section 24, agreements reached with the governing bodies, identifying and communicating interests. It’s all there in the existing statute. TANGI UTIKERE (Labour—Palmerston North) (15:50): Thank you, Madam Chair. I thank the Associate Minister of Transport for his earlier response to my question about accountability, but I have to say that I am somewhat concerned at his answer, because my question was about where the accountability lies and if people who are in Auckland, who have an issue, not too dissimilar to what my colleague Miss Williams has touched on, but maybe something different in nature. I asked and offered up some suggestions around perhaps the accountability lay at the ballot box, perhaps at it lay through other processes. But to hear from the Minister that judicial review is the option that’s available to people as a form of accountability, that is extremely concerning. Let’s just step through what that would mean because someone—and let’s be frank about this, not many people in our community are familiar with judicial review because they don’t themselves go through it. Because it is a very timely—well, not necessarily sort of timely, but a very expensive process for people to go through. So I’m interested to hear from the Minister now—and this is not something that came in front of the Transport and Infrastructure Committee about the opportunity for judicial review. I am surprised because this is a Government in the environment space that is making a lot of changes when it comes to people’s ability, through the courts, to be able to access that avenue or not. I’d be interested in the clarity from the Minister around what he was referring to when he talked about judicial review; people always have the opportunity for judicial review. I think most people who engage with either a local board or the governing body would not have to expect to rely on judicial review if they have an issue or they have something to do with accountability. So I’ll leave that with the Minister. Maybe I just didn’t quite get that as clearly as I should have, but given the Minister has raised it, I’m interested in his response around that. I also note that one of the changes that the select committee also made was around some of the terminology. When we’re looking at clauses 7 and 8, there is a lot of kind of change between the words “allocated” and “conferred”. So, what is basically the difference there between what is allocated and conferred? Would we expect that the transportation options and choices that would be available to either the local board members or the local board as an entity or the new regional land transport committee that’s going to be stood up—where does the conferment come? Where does the allocation come and where does that sit? Given that there have been some changes made in that particular space, it’s important to understand—for consistency—why one can’t be just the terminology used for all of those changes as opposed to separating them out as two separate ones? Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (15:53): Well, in the member’s first question, he outlined a whole range of opportunities for ratepayers to hold their decision makers accountable where he’s included things like elections at the ballot box, the annual planning process, advocacy to their local councillors. I added on top of that, I agreed and I said they are all relevant places that you can go in order to hold your decision makers accountable. I added on top of that the underlying resort that one can take, which is judicial review, which is, I guess, the most legal, formal process of challenging a decision made by a decision-making body. That’s obviously one of the last steps you can do, apart from appealing to legislative change, as well. In terms of the difference or the removal of the term “allocated to” and replacement with “conferred on”, my understanding is that’s just essentially a technical drafting change to make it very clear that the local boards must undertake their conferred responsibilities and they may exercise any of the conferred powers under clauses 47A to 47D. I’m advised that it’s a drafting reason rather than any particular change in power. ARENA WILLIAMS (Labour—Manurewa) (15:54): Thank you, Madam Chair. I want to ask the Minister to confirm what he said. I think he has said that local boards act as if they are the local authority in setting of the rules such as truck parking. That would be a change in the position that it is currently. I’ll refer him to Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004, which is the rule which most of these bylaws and other rules are made under, that confers ministerial power to set rules by regulation, and then local authorities are the bodies which are delegated to, within that, to make the rules. The question I’m asking here is: is his new clause 7 confusing whether the local board is the local authority, and I think he’s confirmed what that is. So if they are the local—he’s shaking his head. He might need to confirm it because I think he’s saying that the local board is the local authority. So, if the local board is the local authority then, firstly, what is the status of the Vehicle Use and Parking Bylaw 2025 which was set by Auckland Council? Does that continue until local boards set their own rules? Is it the case that the Manurewa Local Board could have a completely different rule for the parking of trucks to the Papakura Local Board? Would that be a sensible situation given that the Land Transport (Road User) Rule, which is the national rule, is quite permissive if all local authorities to set a rule? And yet, you know, one would not imagine that within a metropolitan area for the same carriers, the same providers, a different rule would apply to one side of the street as for the other. That is why Auckland Council has been able to set these rules as a body for all local authorities. What does his new rule mean in that context? If we need one rule for Tangi as the truck driver to park in Papakura and Tangi— CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): Tangi Utikere. ARENA WILLIAMS: Tangi Utikere as the truck driver to park in Papakura, as required to park in Manurewa, then who is the appropriate local authority to do that? I ask that not as a—it’s not frivolous. This is a live issue which Auckland Transport is considering at the moment because there are several business districts who are calling for more stringent rules around this, and they would like for local boards in certain areas to be able to set more stringent rules than the rest of the city. But you can see the values judgement that a Minister is being asked to make here around localisation for certain communities, say in Manurewa where the trucks are parked outside the local schools, and that wouldn’t fly in some central urban suburbs, where residents would vociferously complain, and yet that’s not what happens in some poorer communities where people aren’t as availed of their rights and, as the Minister says, they’re not as likely get in touch with their local board members and their councillors. Isn’t it fair, then, that we would set more stringent rules so that residents can be assured that their sight lines won’t be compromised to their children in the park, or that at night, trucks won’t park in areas that cause near misses and fatalities and crashes. That’s what this issue is about. I think the Minister has said that local boards will now set those rules. That is what some of those businesses associations are asking for. But it’s not necessarily a rule which is going to serve the needs of those commercial users and indeed manufacturers who have different sites around the city and are trying to get their vehicles from one place to another. It’s not just about trucks. There are several of these rules which have a level of consistency across Auckland, and yet what is being done by new section 12 is a further devolution to local boards, where I think the Minister has said that they will be treated as if they are the local authority for the purpose of the secondary regional legislation, which is the rule that applies nationally. Things like can you sell food that has been made from a home kitchen if you have a certification that is set at a national level, that is a national rule; and then local authorities set the rules around those; things like can you sell alcohol from a corner store in a domestic area— CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): As I understand it, this bill is related to transport. ARENA WILLIAMS: That’s right, that’s right. But this is about local decision making and how you would enact that. So the question for the Minister is: is what he has said about local authorities and local wards being synonymous because of his change, at his new clause 7(4)(b), the case for all of these rules, and how will they interact with the national rules? Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (15:59): Thank you, Madam Chair. Under the existing statute, local boards are able to make decisions as if they are the governing body where they are allocated those decisions and those powers. So, the bill itself, as far as I can tell, doesn’t actually outline which decisions should or should not be made by local boards. They are decisions for the council to allocate to it, in accordance with section 16. All I can say on this matter is that if local boards are given decision-making powers, they do so as if they are the local authority. They act as the Auckland Council when making those decisions because they are part of the Auckland Council, and they have been given the power by the governing body to make those decisions. That’s what the law is currently and what new subparagraph (4) says is that nothing in this section or new section 12 as amended or clause 7 in the bill—nothing in the section limits that ability that already exists currently. HELEN WHITE (Labour—Mt Albert) (16:00): Thank you, Madam Chair. I am going to ask you some specific questions about the streets that are going to be around the Eden Park precinct. The Eden Park precinct belongs in Part 2, but my understanding is the streets that surround that will be in this part. They are part of the same things that Arena Williams is talking about because they are the streets that the local board will have determination over. I had a meeting the other day with the residents in that area and it’s actually the outer streets outside of the traffic precinct that have issues because there isn’t the same control. My understanding is the proposal here is that that control over the area that is controlled traffic—and I’ll ask some questions about what the Eden Park precinct contains in the later part—but beyond that, we have an area that’s going to have control of the local board. I would like the Minister to confirm that those streets that are beyond it will be controlled by the local board and what assurance people can be given that there will be communication between the group that is controlling the area of traffic management, which is smaller, with the local board, because if the local board is making those decisions, it’s going to have an impact in terms of what happens next. For example, I’d like to know what discussions there will be and what freedom there is to make rules over parking in those areas. What I’m told by residents is you’ve got a spillover effect where people can’t park within the zone and so they park just out of it, and so we get all these issues just out of the zone where people park on the curbs and it makes it really a very different thing to live in those streets. I’m not sure what those arrangements are between the two groups or does the local board simply have to react? Then my last question on this is really about conflicts of interest. I love the idea of local boards having more control over roads. I think it’s a really sound one. But what I want to know is: what happens when you have people with a conflict of interest in terms of determining what happens to a local street? For example, the local board member themselves might live in that street. That might be an obvious one that’s dealt with, but it’s more about the issue of people having conflicts that are about the connections. Now, they’re naturally going to have connections in those areas. It’s the nature of what they’re doing; they’re local. But what kinds of protections are there around that? Now, we’ve heard Tangi Utikere talk about the issue over judicial review. Obviously, that whole concept is based on something that’s a really high watermark in terms of appeal. So what is the story here in terms of the normal navigation of conflicts of interests, for example, if your grandfather lives in the street, if your auntie lives in the street, or your best friend lives on the street, and you are making decisions about what happens in those situations? Thank you. I’d really like the answers. Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (16:03): Thank you, Madam Chair. If the member goes to new section 48, inserted by clause 14—well, it’s not technically new in some pieces. But anyway, section 48 is the section which says that the council must develop Auckland roading classification framework. Within that framework will be the roads and areas that local boards will or will not be responsible for. The bill doesn’t set those decisions; that’s up to the council when they develop the roading classification framework. Then just on the questions of conflicts of interests, in the same clause 14, at new section *40(a), there’s a conflicts of interest section, which states that Schedule 3 of the Act applies to the Auckland Regional Transport Committee. When any conflicts do arise, both Schedule 3 applies but also the existing policies and procedures that the Auckland Council would have for managing conflicts generally would also apply. There’s nothing really, I think, in the bill which would address that apart from the obvious robust and thorough processes that the leadership of Auckland Council already undertakes to manage the conflicts of interest with arise. ARENA WILLIAMS (Labour—Manurewa) (16:04): Thank you, Madam Chair. As the Minister will know, some of these devolution powers to the local board—look, they are welcomed by all parties in Parliament and many stakeholders outside of it. The ability of local boards to exercise power in his new section 4B, inserted by clause 5—has he managed to capture the frustration of Aucklanders that infringement fees for land transport offences are set under the Land Transport (Offences and Penalties) Regulations 1999 and not at the council level or at the local board level? Is it possible for the conferment of powers under those rules to local boards to set locally relevant fees for parking infringements? The problem here is huge in that Aucklanders have fees—for instance, $100 for inconsiderate parking. There were 7,000 traffic incidents concerning heavy vehicle parking in the Wiri Business Association’s district alone, including two fatalities last year. That is serious, and yet the top infringement fee is $100. The call for much of this devolution was based on the lack of local accountability for things like fees. Has the Minister managed, through his new section 4B, to include infringement powers as something that Aucklanders can have a say on through their local boards? Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (16:06): I’ll seek some advice on that. CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): The Minister has just indicated he’s seeking some advice. I’m going to call Arena Williams, but I will also say at this time that Part 1 is quite small, so we want to hone in on that from here on in. ARENA WILLIAMS (Labour—Manurewa) (16:06): Thank you, Madam Chair. I also want to refer the Minister to the purposes for local boards in the original legislation. Those are at clauses 152, 153, and 157. They specifically mention those things that the local authorities can set rules around. These also include things like the discharge of pollutants into the environment and things like when you are fixing a heavy truck on a local road or on a national highway. The rules are different, but for different areas, they are resulting in the flow-off of pollutants through fixing vehicles into, say, the Manukau Harbour, which is a significant issue for local residents and is a continuing source of frustration for Aucklanders. Has the Minister given some thought to the way that local environmental protections for road users will be something that local boards can have a say on? Why is it the case that over the last 10 years of the Auckland super-city, when local areas have been raising these issues like run-off into local streams and local harbours, local boards will seemingly not be able to be devolved powers to set locally relevant rules and solutions to these hazards? When you have the regular practice of some truck operators in Wiri fixing trucks on the side of the street and not only taking up the road space, which they can be fined for as a dangerous use of the road, but they are also emitting oil and other run-off straight into the drains—which is not caught; it flows straight into the Manukau Harbour—why is it that the local board can’t step in when residents are raising these issues? The Wiri Business Association has petitioned Auckland Transport about this. Auckland Transport says that they need a consistent rule around the city, but that is something that has been raised consistently over the last 10 years and hasn’t been able to be implemented because it doesn’t fit for the rest of the city. Because this isn’t a huge problem for the residents in rest of the city, is it the case that with local boards expecting to receive more power because of the result of this legislation, that they will, in fact, be stymied once again? For people who are looking at this legislation and hailing it as a big step forward for Aucklanders and their democratic control over their elected members and their transport functions, will they once again see that actually things that matter to them like where people can park, like the infringements that can be levied against people who park inconsiderately and cause safety hazards, and to those people who would pour pollutants down the drain because of fixing their vehicles in the wrong kind of way—will all of that actually not be devolved to local boards? So we see this increase on expectations of local boards once again undermining people’s faith in their local democracy and seeing more and more of a stepping back from the need to vote in their local democratic elections and their need for local board members to be accountable to the community. Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (16:09): Thank you, Madam Chair. I’ve been helpfully advised that if we dig all the way through the bill to Schedule 2, and we look to what will be Schedule 4 in the Act, that lists the local board’s powers, functions, and responsibilities in relation to local roads and collector roads. Hopefully, that will answer most of the member’s questions about what local boards will have the power, function, or responsibility to do. It’s on page 46 and 47 of the bill, for reference. I’m advised that does not include fees. Fees are set by the governing body, not local boards, and they are subject to, obviously, the primary legislative constraints on that as well. As far as I can tell, unless there’s some clever interpretation of those powers in Schedule 4, it would not include discharge of pollutants into the environment. Of course, those are all valid arguments to make about how much you devolve power to local boards, particularly in Auckland. I’m sure that many Aucklanders would agree with some of it and disagree with some of it, but in this instance, we’re talking about particular transport responsibilities. With these changes, local boards will have some powers to make some decisions around transport-related issues. CHAIRPERSON (Barbara Kuriger): Tangi Utikere—one more specific question on this part. TANGI UTIKERE (Labour—Palmerston North) (16:10): Yes. Thank you, Madam Chair, and I take your direction in terms of where we’re heading. I want to ask the Minister a very tight question, which is about clause 8. It is in relation to the responsibilities and the functions that are conferred to a local board, and they relate to new sections 47A to 47D, which we’ll get to in the next part. It seems to me that there are often funding implications and resourcing implications for any decision that a local board may take, so a very quick question to the Minister is: is he satisfied that the ability for the local boards to be able to be responsive to their communities in making these decisions? Does he have any concerns about the lack of resourcing or empowerment of the local boards to be able to actually go ahead and deliver that? If we’re looking at maintaining or preserving some form of regional coherence as a structure with the regional land transport committee in place but also enhancing local responsiveness, does he have any concern that decisions will be driven around transport to do with an inability for the local board to receive adequate resourcing from the governing body? Hon JAMES MEAGER (Associate Minister of Transport) (16:12): No, I don’t have any concerns. I haven’t had any concerns raised with me. With the excellent leadership of Auckland Council, I’m sure they’ll maintain a close eye on their rates and how they’re spent appropriately. Part 1 agreed to.

Documents and supporting material