Parliament bill

Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill

Royal assent

Last checked
July 15, 2026 15:51
Source captured
July 15, 2026 15:51
Source
View on Parliament.nz

What this bill does

The bill passed its second reading by voice vote; no party or individual counts were recorded. According to the bill, Crown confiscations, land purchases, laws and mining left Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu virtually landless, damaged Te Aroha maunga, and disrupted cultural, economic and spiritual connections. The bill aims to settle Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu’s historical claims against the Crown, record Crown acknowledgements and an apology, and give effect to the settlement deed. The bill makes the specified historical claims final and generally removes their further consideration by courts or tribunals. It transfers specified land and minerals to the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust and provides cultural recognition and participation measures for significant areas.

AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.

Latest voting result

April 22, 2026
Second reading: Passed Voice vote

Decision recorded by voice vote; no individual or party counts were recorded.

View the vote in Hansard

Arguments raised in Parliament

AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.

Arguments for

Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu will receive financial, commercial, site-return, and collective redress that is claimed to strengthen its cultural identity, economic base, and regional collaboration.

The bill’s apology and redress are argued to help Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu recover from Crown actions that left it landless, disconnected from its whenua, and unable to fully transmit tikanga and mātauranga to later generations.

Returning culturally important sites and supporting iwi presence are claimed to enable Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu rangatahi and mokopuna to reconnect with tikanga, whakapapa, whenua, and te reo.

Arguments against

No distinct against arguments were identified in the linked debates.

Nuance and qualifications

Although supporting the settlement, the Greens argue that its redress is only a small part of the historic harm and should not be treated as a full-and-final end to the Crown–iwi relationship.

The prolonged settlement process left the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust unable to update its claimant community for extended periods, contributing to dissatisfaction and highlighting a need to mitigate delay impacts.

Bill text

Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill

Version published March 06, 2026 00:00.

Pire Whakataunga Kerēme a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2024 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. 3 Purpose The purpose of this Act is— a to record the acknowledgements and apology given by the Crown to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in the deed of settlement; and b to give effect to certain provisions of the deed of settlement that settles the historical claims of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. 4 Provisions to take effect on settlement date The provisions of this Act take effect on the settlement date unless stated otherwise. Before the date on which a provision takes effect, a person may prepare or sign a document or do anything else that is required for— a the provision to have full effect on that date; or b a power to be exercised under the provision on that date; or c a duty to be performed under the provision on that date. 5 Act binds the Crown This Act binds the Crown. 6 Outline This section is a guide to the overall scheme and effect of this Act, but does not affect the interpretation or application of the other provisions of this Act or of the d…
Read full bill text
Pire Whakataunga Kerēme a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2024 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. 3 Purpose The purpose of this Act is— a to record the acknowledgements and apology given by the Crown to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in the deed of settlement; and b to give effect to certain provisions of the deed of settlement that settles the historical claims of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. 4 Provisions to take effect on settlement date The provisions of this Act take effect on the settlement date unless stated otherwise. Before the date on which a provision takes effect, a person may prepare or sign a document or do anything else that is required for— a the provision to have full effect on that date; or b a power to be exercised under the provision on that date; or c a duty to be performed under the provision on that date. 5 Act binds the Crown This Act binds the Crown. 6 Outline This section is a guide to the overall scheme and effect of this Act, but does not affect the interpretation or application of the other provisions of this Act or of the deed of settlement. This Part— a sets out the purpose of this Act; and b provides that the provisions of this Act take effect on the settlement date unless a provision states otherwise; and c specifies that the Act binds the Crown; and d sets out a summary of the historical account, and records the text of the acknowledgements and apology given by the Crown to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, as recorded in the deed of settlement; and e defines terms used in this Act, including key terms such as Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu and historical claims; and f provides that the settlement of the historical claims is final; and g provides for— i the effect of the settlement of the historical claims on the jurisdiction of a court, tribunal, or other judicial body in respect of the historical claims; and ii a consequential amendment to the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975; and iii the effect of the settlement on certain memorials; and iv the exclusion of the limit on the duration of a trust; and v access to the deed of settlement. Part 2 provides for cultural redress, including— a cultural redress requiring vesting in the trustees of the fee simple estate in certain cultural redress properties; and b cultural redress that does not involve the vesting of land, namely,— i an overlay classification applying to a certain area of land; and ii a statutory acknowledgement by the Crown of the statements made by Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu of their cultural, historical, spiritual, and traditional association with certain statutory areas and the effect of that acknowledgement, together with a deed of recognition for those areas; and iii protocols for primary industries and taonga tūturu on the terms set out in the documents schedule. Part 3 provides for commercial redress, including,— a in subpart 1 , the transfer of land; and b in subpart 2 , the vesting of certain Crown owned minerals and related matters. There are 4 schedules, as follows: a Schedule 1 describes the cultural redress properties: b Schedule 2 describes the Te Aroha Domain land: c Schedule 3 describes the overlay area to which the overlay classification applies: d Schedule 4 describes the statutory areas to which the statutory acknowledgement relates and for which a deed of recognition is issued. 7 Summary of historical account, acknowledgements, and apology Section 8 summarises the historical account in the deed of settlement, setting out the basis for the acknowledgements and apology. Sections 9 and 10 record the text of the acknowledgements and apology given by the Crown to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in the deed of settlement. The acknowledgements and apology are to be read together with the historical account recorded in part 2 of the deed of settlement. 8 Summary of historical account Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu tradition records that before Europeans came to Te Aroha, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu lived on the lands on and surrounding Te Aroha Maunga . In 1863, the Crown initiated war with Māori in the Waikato when its armed forces crossed the Mangatāwhiri Stream. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu sent men to fight Crown forces in Waikato. The Crown regarded Māori who fought against it as rebels and as punishment confiscated 290,000 acres of land in the Tauranga district between 1865 and 1868. This included lands in which Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu had interests. It subsequently returned 240,000 acres to Māori in individualised title. In 1864, the Crown purchased the Katikati and Te Puna blocks. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu had interests in some of those lands and received payment of £500. The 1866 deed for the blocks provided for reserves containing wāhi tapu and urupā but there is no evidence that those reserves were made. After the Crown acquired the Katikati and Te Puna blocks, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu retained no lands in Tauranga Moana. In 1871, the Native Land Court overturned an earlier decision and awarded the Aroha block to Hauraki iwi including Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Between 1872 and 1877, the Crown purchased much of the Aroha block from other iwi. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu objected to other iwi receiving payment for land they considered to be theirs. In 1878, following an investigation by the Native Land Court, the entire block was awarded to the Crown, subject to the provision of reserves for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. The Crown retained the hot springs near Te Aroha when the Omahu Reserve was granted to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in 1878. According to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu traditions, the land was gifted to the Crown by the iwi, who would have ongoing rights to use the springs. By the early twentieth century, however, Māori no longer had free access to the springs or input into the management of this tapu site. In 1880, the Crown negotiated a lease with Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to open a goldfield on the Omahu Reserve. As part of that agreement, the Crown promised to build a township at Te Aroha with a reserve for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. In 1882, streets within the township on Māori reserved land were declared public roads. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu received no compensation for this. Between 1884 and 1894, the Crown, local authorities, and private buyers progressively acquired Māori interests in Te Aroha. By the 1920s, the Crown had purchased almost all of the reserve land awarded to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. In the early twentieth century the Crown used special legislation to acquire further land in Te Aroha. Crown developments in the Te Aroha area continued in the 1960s. They included the construction of a road to the summit of Te Aroha and the granting of a mining licence to a private company. The mine site became severely polluted and the damage to this tapu land has caused ongoing distress to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. By the end of the twentieth century, less than 3% of the land in the Aroha block remained in Māori ownership. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu’s resulting marginalisation, including the loss of te reo Māori, sickness, and socio-economic deprivation, caused much suffering for the iwi. With limited opportunities in their rohe, many Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu moved to cities. This undermined the ability of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to sustain their culture and identity and to pass mātauranga Māori on to their mokopuna. He whakarāpopototanga o ngā kōrero tuku iho e pā ana ki ngā kerēme a ngāti rāhiri tumutumu E kī ana ngā tutuku a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, i mua atu i te taenga mai o te Pākehā ki Te Aroha, i te noho a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki ngā whenua o runga o Te Aroha Maunga , me ngā whenua i ōna taha. I te marama o Hūrae 1863 ka huakina e te Karauna tana pakanga ki te iwi Māori o Waikato, i te whakawhitinga o ana ope hōia i te awa o Mangatāwhiri. Ka tukua e Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu he tangata ki te whawhai ki ngā hōia o te Karauna i Waikato. E ai ki te Karauna ko ngāi Māori i whawhai ki a ia he iwi tutū, ā, hei whakawhiu i aua hapū ka murua e ia 290,000 eka o ngā whenua i te rohe o Tauranga i waenga i ngā tau 1865 me 1868. Kei roto i ēnei whenua ētahi i whai pānga ai a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki roto. Nō muri mai ka whakahokia e ia ētahi 240,000 eka ki te Māori hei whenua taitara takitahi. I te tau 1864 i hokona e te Karauna ngā poraka o Katikati me Te Puna. I whai pānga anō a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki ētahi o ēnei whenua, ā, i whiwhi ia i te utu £500. I raro i te tīti o 1866 mō aua poraka, tōna tikanga kia wehea he rāhui mō ngā wāhi tapu me ngā urupā, engari kāore he tohu i muri i tērā kua hangaia aua rāhui. I muri i te hoko a te Karaunga i ngā poraka o Te Puna-Katikati, kāore kau he whenua i toe mai mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i te rohe o Tauranga Moana. I te tau 1871 ka huripokina e te Kōti Whakawā Whenua Māori tētahi whakatau o mua, ā, ka whakawhiwhia te poraka o Aroha ki ngā iwi o Hauraki, tae atu ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. I waenga i ngā tau 1872 me 1877 i hokona e te Karauna te nuinga o te poraka o Aroha i ētahi atu iwi. I whakahē anō a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki te whiwhinga o ētahi atu iwi i te utu mō te whenua i mea rā rātou nō rātou kē anō. I te tau 1878 ka whakawhiwhia e te Kōti Whakawā Whenua Māori te katoa o te poraka ki te Karauna, mēnā ka whakatūria he rāhui motuhake mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. I puritia ngā puia i te takiwā o te Aroha e te Karauna, i te karātitanga o te Rāhui o Omahu ki a Ngāti Rāhiri i te tau 1878. E ai ki ngā kōrero tuku iho a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i takohatia aua whenua ki te Karauna e te iwi, me te kī, ka noho tonu ngā mōtika katoa ki te iwi kia whakamahi ia i aua puia. Engari nō te taenga ki ngā tau tuatahi o te rau tau rua tekau kāore i tino whakawāteatia ngā puia kia kore-utu mā ngāi Māori, ā, kāore ō rātou mana whakahaere i tēnei wāhi tapu. I te tau 1880 ka tau tētahi kirimana i waenga i te Karauna me Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu hei huaki i tētahi keringa kōura ki te Rāhui o Omahu. Hei wāhanga o tēnei kirimana, i takoto te kī taurangi a te Karauna ka hangaia e ia tētahi tāone i Te Aroha, me tētahi rāhui mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. I te tau 1882 ka whakapuakina e te Karauna ko ngā tiriti katoa i roto i te tāone i runga i ngā whenua rāhui Māori, he rori tūmatanui. Kāore kē a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i whiwhi kāpiheihana mō tēnei whakapuaki. I waenga i ngā tau 1884 me 1894 kua oti te hoko haere ngā pānga whenua Māori maha i Te Aroha e te Karauna, e ngā mana ā-takiwā me ngā kaihoko tūmataiti. Nō te taenga ki te ngahuru tau 1920 kua oti te nuinga o ngā whenua rāhui i whakawhiwhia ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu te hoko e te Karauna. I ngā tau tuatahi o te rau tau rua tekau ka whakaurua e te Karauna ētahi ture motuhake hei whakawhānui i tāna tango i ētahi atu pānga i te tāone o Te Aroha. I haere tonu ngā whanaketanga a te Karauna i te rohe o Te Aroha i te ngahuru tau 1960. Hei wāhi o aua mahi, ka hangaia he rori ki te tihi o te Aroha, ā, ka tukua hoki he raihana keringa ki tētahi kamupene tūmataiti. I noho ko ngā tūkinotanga a te keringa kōura me te rarunga o ēnei whenua tapu hei mamaetanga tino nui mā Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Ka tae nei ki te mutunga o te rau tau rua tekau, he iti iho i te toru ōrau o ngā whenua o te poraka o Aroha i te noho tonu ki ngā ringaringa o te iwi Māori. Nā ngā hekenga o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i aua tau, tae atu ki te ngaromanga o te reo Māori, te kore e kake ki ngā taumata i ngā kura, te māuiui, me te rarunga i te taha oranga, i taumaha ai, i tino mamae ai te iwi. Nā te iti o ngā whāinga wāhi i tō rātou rohe, ka wehe atu te tini o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki te kimi mahi i roto i ngā tāone. Nā konei i uaua ai te mahi a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki te hapāi i āna tikanga me ōna āhuatanga, tae atu ki tōna kaha ki te tuku atu i te mātauranga Māori ki ā rātou mokopuna. 9 Acknowledgements The Crown acknowledges that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu has well-founded and legitimate grievances, and that until now it has failed to address those in an appropriate manner. The Crown’s provision of redress to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu for those historical grievances is long overdue. The Crown acknowledges that the Tauranga raupatu and the subsequent Tauranga District Lands Acts 1867 and 1868 compulsorily extinguished all customary interests within the confiscation district, including those of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, and this was unjust and breached te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. The Crown acknowledges that— a it failed to actively protect Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu interests in lands they wished to retain when it initiated the purchase of Te Puna and Katikati blocks in 1864 without investigating the rights of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; and b it also failed to actively protect Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu interests in land they wished to retain when it did not carry out its agreement in the 1866 Te Puna Katikati deed to set aside reserves, including certain wāhi tapu sites, and left Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu alienated from their ancestral lands in Tauranga; and c these actions breached te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. The Crown acknowledges that— a it introduced the native land laws without consulting Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu and the individualisation of title imposed on Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu lands, including sacred sites such as Te Aroha, was inconsistent with tikanga Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; and b Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu whānau and hapū had no choice but to participate in the Native Land Court system to protect their interests in their lands and to integrate land into the modern economy; and c the operation and impact of the native land laws, in particular the awarding of land to individual Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu rather than to their iwi or hapū, made those lands more susceptible to partition, fragmentation, and alienation; and d this contributed to the further erosion of the traditional tribal structures of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, which were based on collective tribal and hapū custodianship of land, and the Crown failed to take adequate steps to protect those structures and this was a breach of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. The Crown acknowledges that it deprived some Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu individuals of control of their land without their consent when it proclaimed a goldfield in Te Aroha, and that this failure to respect their legal rights was a breach of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. The Crown acknowledges that valuable mineral resources on lands leased and sold by Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu provided economic benefits to the nation. The Crown acknowledges that— a it continued to control lands in Hauraki owned by Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, which were leased to settlers through residence site licences for many years after the decline of the gold mining industry in the region; and b it failed for many decades to regularly revise rents for residence site licence lands, and that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu received rents well below market value for the lease of their lands as a consequence of this failure; and c it promoted legislation that converted residence site licences to leases in perpetuity, leaving Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu no alternative but to sell their lands to the Crown; and d these actions deprived Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu of their rangatiratanga over land subject to residence site licences and breached te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. The Crown acknowledges that once it acquired Te Aroha springs it did not make provision for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu’s relationship with this tapu site, and this lack of recognition is a long-standing grievance for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. The Crown acknowledges that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu were rendered virtually landless due to the cumulative effect of Crown actions and omissions, including— a the purchasing of the Omahu, Wairakau, and Manawaru reserve blocks, which had been established to ensure that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu retained sufficient land for their future needs; and b the taking of lands under public works legislation that were of particular significance to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; and c the promotion of legislation, in 1911, to override Ema Lipsey’s will, which enabled the sale of land to the Crown that she had intended to remain with Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. The Crown further acknowledges that its failure to ensure that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu retained sufficient lands for its present and future needs was a breach of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles. The Crown acknowledges that environmental changes and pollution since the nineteenth century have been a source of distress and grievance for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. In particular, the Crown acknowledges that— a gold mining on Te Aroha from 1880 caused pollution, and this has caused harm to the well-being of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; and b further mining for copper, zinc, and lead on Te Aroha maunga from 1966 to 1973 caused substantial environmental damage, and has left the Tui mine site as one of the most polluted sites in Aotearoa New Zealand; and c the damage done to Te Aroha maunga is an ongoing and deeply felt grievance for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. The Crown acknowledges that public works takings have impeded the ability of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to maintain and foster spiritual connections with their ancestral lands. The Crown acknowledges that through the alienation of most of their land Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu have lost control over many of their significant sites and resources. This has had an ongoing impact on the ability of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to maintain spiritual connections to their ancestral lands, undermined their economic base, and eroded their capacity to fulfil their kaitiaki responsibilities. The Crown acknowledges the harm endured by many Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu tamariki from decades of Crown policies that strongly discouraged the use of te reo Māori in schools. The Crown also acknowledges the detrimental effects this had on Māori language proficiency and fluency and the impact on the intergenerational transmission of te reo Māori and knowledge of mātauranga Māori practices. The Crown acknowledges that the health of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu has been worse than that of many other New Zealanders, and they have not had the same opportunities in life that many other New Zealanders have enjoyed. The Crown recognises that through its actions and omissions it has contributed to the economic and spiritual hardship and marginalisation of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in their rohe. Ngā Whakaaetanga Kei te whakaaae te Karauna ki ngā nawe whai take, whai tikanga hoki, o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, waihoki, tae mai ki nāianei kāore anō kia whakatikaina ō mua hē, kia ea i runga i te tika. Kua roa rawa te iwi e tatari ana ki te whakaeanga i ngā hara a te Karauna o mua, mō ngā nawe tuku iho o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Kei te whakaae te Kārauna ko ēnei mahi, arā, te raupatu i Tauranga me ngā Ture o muri mai, arā, ngā Ture e kīa nei te Tauranga District Lands Acts 1867 me 1868, i murua katoatia ai ngā pānga tuku iho i te rohe muru raupatu, tae atu ki ērā o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki ō rātou whenua, ā, i tino hē tēnei mahi, he takahanga hoki i te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono. Kei te whakaae te Karauna— a kāore i tika tāna tiaki i ngā pānga o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i hiahia rā rātou ki te pupuru i tāna tahuritanga i te hoko o ngā poraka o Te Puna me Katikati i te tau 1864 me tana kore e āta wherawhera mārire i ngā mōtika o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i te tuatahi; b kāore i tika tana tiaki i ngā pānga o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki ngā whenua i hiahia rā rātou ki te pupuru i tāna korenga e whakatinana i te kirimana o te tīti o Te Puna Katikati o 1866, hei whakatū rāhui, tae atu ki ētahi wāhi tapu, ā, i noho tauwehe anō a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i ō rātou whenua tuku iho i Tauranga; ā, c ko ēnei mahi hei takahanga i te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono. Kei te whakaae te Karauna— a ka whakaurua e ia ētahi ture whenua Māori, kāore i kōrero ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i te tuatahi, ā, ko te taitara takitahi i ngā whenua o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, tae atu ki ngā wāhi tapu pēnei me Te Aroha, i taupatupatu ki ngā tikanga a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; b kāore he putanga mō ngā whānau me ngā hapū o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, i tua atu i te whakauru atu ki ngā whakaritenga o te Kōti Whenua Māori, hei kaupare i ō rātou pānga, hei urutomo hoki ki te ōhanga o te ao hōu; c ko te hāpainga me te pānga o ngā ture whenua Māori, otirā, te whakawhiwhinga taitara takitahi te mea matua, ki ngā tāngata takitahi o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, hāunga ia te iwi me te hapū, te take i wāhia ai, i marara ai, i ngaro rawa ai aua whenua; ā d nā konei i horohoro ai ngā kaupapa whakahaere o te iwi o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, i takea mai hoki ōna tikanga tuku iho i te pupuru ā-iwi, ā-hapū hoki i te whenua, ā kīhai te Karauna i anga mai ki te tiaki i aua ritenga, i aua kaupapa hoki, ā, he takahanga anō tēnei o Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono. Kei te whakaae te Karauna i raruraru ētahi o ngā tāngata takitahi o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i te rironga atu o ō rātou whenua, kāore hoki aua tāngata i whakaae i te tuatahi, i te whakapuakitanga a te Karauna i te keringa kōura i Te Aroha, ā, ka noho tāna kore e hāpai i ō rātou mōtika ā-ture hei takanga anō o te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono. Kei te whakaae te Karauna nā ngā rawa matū i ngā whenua i rīhitia, i hokona rānei e Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i hua ake ai he painga ā-ōhanga mō te motu katoa. Kei te whakaae te Karauna— a i whakahaere tonu ia i ngā whenua o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i Hauraki i rīhitia ki ngā manene nā runga i ngā raihana whenua kāinga noho mō ngā tau tini i muri mai i te hekenga o ngā mahi keri kōura i te rohe; b i ngoikore ia i tāna korenga e hoki mai ki te whakahōu i ngā rēti, mō ngā ngahuru tau tini, mō ngā raihana whenua kāinga noho, ā, i whiwhi a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i ngā rēti i raro rawa i tō te ao hokohoko whānui mō ngā rīhi whenua, nā tēnei ngoikorenga te take; c i whakaurua mai e ia he ture hei huri i ngā raihana whenua kāinga noho hei rīhi mutunga kore, ā, nā konei kāore he huarahi kē atu i wātea ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i te hokonga o ō rātou whenua e te Karauna; ā d ko ēnei mahi i tango i te rangatiranga o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki ō rātou whenua i raro i aua raihana whenua kāinga noho, ā, he takahanga anō tēnei i te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono. Kei te whakaae te Kārauna, i muri i tāna hoko i ngā puia i Te Aroha kāore i whakaritea he tikanga hei tiaki i te pānga tuku iho o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki tēnei wāhi tapu, ā, ko tēnei korenga e whakaae ki aua here tētahi nawe nui mā Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i ngā whakatupuranga maha. Kei te whakaae te Karauna nā ēnei mahi kua tata whenua kore tonu a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, nā ngā mahi hē pūputu a te Karauna, tae atu ki āna korenga e mahi i ngā mahi e tika ana, tae atu ki: a tāna hoko i ngā poraka rāhui o Omahu, o Wairākau, me Manawaru, i whakatūria rā kia nui anō ngā whenua mō ō rātou hiahia ā raurangi; b tāna tangohanga i ētahi whenua i raro i ngā ture mahi tūmatanui, i noho hei whenua rangatira mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; ā c te hāpainga o tētahi ture i te tau 1911, hei pēhi atu i ngā whakapuaki o te wira a Ema Lipsey, i āhei ai ōna whenua i hiahia rā ia kia noho tūturu ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu te hoko rawa. Nā ngā mahi hē a te Karuana, arā, tāna kore e whakarite tikanga e mau ai tētahi rahinga whenua tōtika mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu o aua wā, mō raurangi hoki, he tika tēnei kia kīa he takahanga o Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono. Kei te whakaae te Karauna ko ngā huringa i te taiao me ngā takakinotanga i ngā whenua me ngā wai, mai i te rau tau tekau mā iwa tētahi take pouritanga nui, tētahi nawe nui hoki mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Otirā kei te whakaae te Karauna: a nā ngā mahi keri kōura i Te Aroha mai i 1880 ka takakinotia te whenua, ā, ka whara te hauora o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i tēnei mahi; b nā ētahi atu mahi keri konukura, konutea me te konumatā i Te Aroha maunga mai i 1966 ki 1973 ka tino tūkinotia te taiao, ā, kua noho te keringa kōura Tūī hei wāhi tino kino rawa atu te takakinotanga i Aotearoa New Zealand; ā c ko te takakinotanga i Te Aroha maunga tētahi nawe mauroa, take whakamamae hoki mō Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Kei te whakaae te Karauna nā ngā tangohanga mō ngā mahi tūmatanui i uaua ai te mahi a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki te whakamahana, ki te whakapipiri hoki ki ngā herenga tuku iho i ō rātou whenua. Kei te whakaae te Karauna nā te rironga atu o te nuinga o ō rātou whenua kua riro atu hoki te mana whakahaere mā Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i te nuinga o ō rātou wāhi tapu me ō rātou rawa. Kua tino pā hoki tēnei ki te kaha o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki te whakapipiri atu ki ō rātou whenua tuku iho, kua turakina hoki tōna puna ora, tōna puna kai hoki, ā, kua whakapōrarurarutia āna mahi kaitiaki i tōna rohe anō. Kei te whakaae te Karauna ki ngā mahi tūkino i pā ki ngā tamariki o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, i kore ai e whakaaetia e ngā kaupapa here o te Karauna kia kōrero Māori i roto i ngā kura. Kei te whakaae hoki te Karauna ki ngā pānga kino o aua kaupapa here ki te mōhiotanga me te matatau ki te reo, me te pānga o ēnei āhuatanga ki te tukunga ā-reanga o te reo Māori, me te mātauranga Māori. Kei te whakaae te Karauna kua hē kē atu te hauora o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i tō te nuinga o ngā tāngata o Aotearoa, ā, kāore i ōrite ngā huarahi i wātea ki ōna uri ki ō te nuinga o ngā tāngata o Aotearoa. Kei te whakaae te Karauna nā āna mahi, hapanga hoki i taumaha kē atu ai ngā raruraru ā-ōhanga, ā-wairua mā te iwi, ā, i parea ai hoki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu ki tahaki i tōna āke rohe. 10 Apology Crown apology The text of the apology offered by the Crown to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, as set out in the deed of settlement, is as follows: “(a) The Crown’s acts and omissions, in the history of its relationship with Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, have led to warfare, confiscation, and the loss of the lands which had sustained you for generations. b In promoting laws and policies which led to the alienation of your whenua and irreversible damage to your sacred taonga Te Aroha maunga, the Crown has caused significant and lasting harm to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. The Crown’s acts and omissions have caused you great social, cultural, and economic hardship, and severely undermined your ability to foster mātauranga Māori and te reo Māori, and to maintain your kaitiaki responsibilities in your rohe. For its actions which harmed Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, and for its breaches of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles, the Crown unreservedly apologises. c The Crown seeks to atone for these injustices and begin a process of healing. Let this settlement mark a new phase in the Crown’s relationship with Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu based on trust and mutual respect, and in keeping with the principles of te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi.” He Whakapāha Tēnei te Karauna te tuku whakapāha atu nei ki a koutou, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, ki ō koutou tūpuna, mokopuna anō hoki: “(a) Nā ngā mahi a te Karauna, otirā nā āna korenga e mahi i ngā mahi e tika ana, i roto i tōna mōhiotanga ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu i roto i ngā whakatupuranga, i ara ake ai te pakanga, te muru raupatu me te ngaromanga atu o ngā whenua i noho hei wai-ū mā koutou mō ngā whakatuputanga maha. b I tāna mahi ki te whakatairanga ture, kaupapa here hoki i ngaro rawa ai ō whenua, me ngā tūkinotanga rongoā-kore i tō koutou taonga tapu, i Te Aroha maunga, kua tino whara, kua raruraru mō ngā tau tini noa iho a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, arā, i ngā mahi a te Karauna. Nā ngā mahi me ngā hapanga a te Karauna i tino whara koutou, i te taha pāpori, i te taha tikanga, i te taha ōhanga, i tino uaua ai tā koutou tukutuku i te mātauranga Māori me te reo Māori, waihoki tō koutou kaha ki te kawe i ngā tikanga kaitiaki i tōu rohe. Mō ēnei mahi, i whara ai a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, me āna takahanga i te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi me ōna mātāpono, ka tino whakapāha atu te Karauna. c E rapu tikanga ana te Karauna ki te whakaea i ēnei hara, ki te whakamahu hoki i ngā nawe. Ko te hiahia kia tīmata i tēnei rā tētahi hononga hou mā te Karauna ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, kia noho ko te whakawhirinaki me te pono hei kaupapa matua, i runga anō i ngā mātāpono o te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi.” 11 Interpretation of Act generally It is the intention of Parliament that the provisions of this Act are interpreted in a manner that best furthers the agreements expressed in the deed of settlement. 12 Interpretation In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— administering body has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Reserves Act 1977 attachments means the attachments to the deed of settlement Commissioner of Crown Lands means the Commissioner of Crown Lands appointed in accordance with section 24AA of the Land Act 1948 consent authority has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 conservation area has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Conservation Act 1987 conservation management plan has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Conservation Act 1987 conservation management strategy has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Conservation Act 1987 council means the Matamata-Piako District Council Crown has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989 cultural redress property has the meaning given in section 22 deed of recognition — a means the deed of recognition issued under section 103 by the Minister of Conservation and the Director-General; and b includes any amendments made under section 103(3) deed of settlement — a means the deed of settlement dated 26 September 2025 and signed by— i the Honourable Paul Goldsmith, Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations, and Nicola Willis, Minister of Finance for and on behalf of the Crown; and ii Nicola Jane Scott and Jill Lisa Taylor for and on behalf of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; and iii Nicola Jane Scott, Daniel John Braid, Michael Francis Barker, Mike Lobb, and Norm Hill being trustees of the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust; and b includes— i the schedules of, and attachments to, the deed; and ii any amendments to the deed or its schedules and attachments deferred selection property has the meaning given in section 113 Director-General means the Director-General of Conservation documents schedule means the documents schedule of the deed of settlement early release commercial property means the property described in part 3 of the property redress schedule effective date means the date that is 6 months after the settlement date historical claims has the meaning given in section 14 interest means a covenant, easement, lease, licence, licence to occupy, tenancy, or other right or obligation affecting a property jointly vested property has the meaning given in section 22 LINZ means Land Information New Zealand local authority has the meaning given in section 5(1) of the Local Government Act 2002 member of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu means an individual referred to in section 13(1)(a) national park management plan has the meaning given to management plan in section 2 of the National Parks Act 1980 Ngāti Tumutumu Trust means the trust of that name established by a trust deed dated 22 August 2018 overlay classification has the meaning given in section 79 property redress schedule means the property redress schedule of the deed of settlement record of title has the meaning given in section 5(1) of the Land Transfer Act 2017 regional council has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 Registrar-General has the meaning given to Registrar in section 5(1) of the Land Transfer Act 2017 representative entity means— a the trustees; and b any person, including any trustee, acting for or on behalf of— i the collective group referred to in section 13(1)(a) ; or ii 1 or more members of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; or iii 1 or more of the whānau, hapū, or groups referred to in section 13(1)(b) reserve has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Reserves Act 1977 reserve property has the meaning given in section 22 resource consent has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 settlement date means the date that is 60 working days after the date on which this Act comes into force statutory acknowledgement has the meaning given in section 94 tikanga means customary values and practices trustees of the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust and trustees mean the trustees, acting in their capacity as trustees, of the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust working day means a day other than— a Saturday, Sunday, Waitangi Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday, Anzac Day, the Sovereign's birthday, Te Rā Aro ki a Matariki/Matariki Observance Day, and Labour Day: b if Waitangi Day or Anzac Day falls on a Saturday or Sunday, the following Monday: c a day in the period commencing with 25 December in any year and ending with the close of 15 January in the following year: d the days observed as the anniversaries of the provinces of Auckland and Wellington. In this Act, a reference to the vesting of a cultural redress property, or the vesting of the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property, includes the vesting of an undivided share of the fee simple estate in the property. 13 Meaning of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu In this Act, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu means— a the collective group composed of individuals who are descended from a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu tūpuna (ancestor); and b every whānau, hapū, or group to the extent that it is composed of individuals referred to in paragraph (a) , including the following Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu hapū: i Ngāti Kopirimau: ii Ngāti Rāhiri: iii Ngāti Te Ruinga: iv Ngāti Hue: v Ngāti Tumutumu: vi Ngāti Kotopara: vii Ngāti Te Atua: viii Ngāti Te Kaha: ix Ngāti Haumia: x Ngāti Tau; and c every individual referred to in paragraph (a) . In this section and section 14 ,— area of interest means the area shown as the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu area of interest in part 1 of the attachments customary rights means rights exercised according to tikanga Māori, including— a rights to occupy land; and b rights in relation to the use of land or other natural or physical resources descended means that a person is descended from another person by— a birth; or b legal adoption; or c whangai (Māori customary adoption in accordance with Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu tikanga) Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu tūpuna (ancestor) means an individual who— a exercised customary rights by virtue of being descended from— i Te Ruinga or Rāhiri; and ii a recognised ancestor of a group listed in subsection (1)(b) ; and b exercised the customary rights predominantly in relation to the area of interest at any time after 6 February 1840. 14 Meaning of historical claims In this Act, historical claims — a means the claims described in subsection (2) ; and b includes the claims described in subsection (3) ; but c does not include the claims described in subsection (4) . The historical claims are every claim that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu or a representative entity had on or before the settlement date, or may have after the settlement date, and that— a is founded on a right arising— i from the Treaty of Waitangi or its principles; or ii under legislation; or iii at common law (including aboriginal title or customary law); or iv from a fiduciary duty; or v otherwise; and b arises from, or relates to, acts or omissions before 21 September 1992— i by or on behalf of the Crown; or ii by or under legislation. The historical claims include— a every claim to the Waitangi Tribunal that relates exclusively to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu or a representative entity, including each of the following claims, to the extent that subsection (2) applies to the claim: i Wai 663 (Te Aroha Lands claim): ii Wai 695 (Te Aroha Land and Mountain claim): iii Wai 1737 (Descendants of Harete Te Wharau claim); and b every other claim to the Waitangi Tribunal, including each of the following, to the extent that subsection (2) applies to the claim and the claim relates to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu or a representative entity: i Wai 100 (Hauraki claim): ii Wai 373 (Maramarua State Forest claim): iii Wai 374 (Auckland Central Railways Land claim): iv Wai 650 (Athenree Forest and Surrounding Lands claim). However, the historical claims do not include— a a claim that a member of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, or a whānau, hapū, or group referred to in section 13(1)(b) , had or may have that is founded on a right arising by virtue of being descended from an ancestor who is not a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu tūpuna; or b a claim that a representative entity had or may have that is based on a claim referred to in paragraph (a) . Subsection (2) is not limited by subsection (3) . A claim may be a historical claim whether or not the claim has arisen or been considered, researched, registered, notified, or made on or before the settlement date. 15 Settlement of historical claims final The historical claims are settled. The settlement of the historical claims is final, and, on and from the settlement date, the Crown is released and discharged from all obligations and liabilities in respect of those claims. Subsections (1) and (2) do not limit the deed of settlement. Despite any other enactment or rule of law, on and from the settlement date, no court, tribunal, or other judicial body has jurisdiction (including the jurisdiction to inquire or further inquire, or to make a finding or recommendation) in respect of— a the historical claims; or b the deed of settlement; or c this Act; or d the redress provided under the deed of settlement or this Act. Subsection (4) does not exclude the jurisdiction of a court, a tribunal, or any other judicial body in respect of the interpretation or implementation of— a the deed of settlement; or b this Act. 16 Amendment to Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 This section amends the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975. In Schedule 3, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2024 , section 15(4) and (5) 17 Certain enactments do not apply The enactments listed in subsection (2) do not apply— a to a cultural redress property (other than a jointly vested property); or b to a jointly vested property on and from the date of its vesting in the trustees; or c to a deferred selection property on and from the date of its transfer to the trustees; or d to the early release commercial property; or e for the benefit of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu or a representative entity. The enactments are— a Part 3 of the Crown Forest Assets Act 1989: b sections 568 to 570 of the Education and Training Act 2020: c Part 3 of the New Zealand Railways Corporation Restructuring Act 1990: d sections 27A to 27C of the State-Owned Enterprises Act 1986: e sections 8A to 8HJ of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975. 18 Resumptive memorials to be cancelled The chief executive of LINZ must issue to the Registrar-General 1 or more certificates that specify the legal description of, and identify the record of title for, each allotment that— a is all or part of— i a cultural redress property: ii a deferred selection property: iii the early release commercial property; and b is subject to a resumptive memorial recorded under an enactment listed in section 17(2) . The chief executive of LINZ must issue a certificate as soon as is reasonably practicable after— a the settlement date, for a cultural redress property (other than a jointly vested property), or the early release commercial property; or b the date of the vesting of the property in the trustees, for a jointly vested property; or c the date of transfer of the property to the trustees, for a deferred selection property. Each certificate must state that it is issued under this section. As soon as is reasonably practicable after receiving a certificate, the Registrar-General must— a register the certificate against each record of title identified in the certificate; and b cancel each memorial recorded under an enactment listed in section 17(2) on a record of title identified in the certificate, but only in respect of each allotment described in the certificate. 19 Limit on duration of trusts does not apply A limit on the duration of a trust in any rule of law, and a limit in the provisions of any Act, including section 16 of the Trusts Act 2019,— a do not prescribe or restrict the period during which— i the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust may exist in law; or ii the trustees may hold or deal with property or income derived from property; and b do not apply to a document entered into to give effect to the deed of settlement if the application of that rule or the provisions of that Act would otherwise make the document, or a right conferred by the document, invalid or ineffective. However, if the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust is or becomes a charitable trust, the trust may continue indefinitely under section 16(6)(a) of the Trusts Act 2019. 20 Status of Ngāti Tumutumu Trust under Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 The Ngāti Tumutumu Trust is not a trust constituted in respect of— a any Maori land for the purposes of section 236(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993; or b any General land owned by Maori for the purposes of section 236(1)(c) of that Act. In this section, General land owned by Maori and Maori land have the meanings given in section 4 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993. 21 Access to deed of settlement The chief executive of the Office of Treaty Settlements and Takutai Moana—Te Tari Whakatau must make copies of the deed of settlement available— a for inspection free of charge, and for purchase at a reasonable price, at that Office in Wellington between 9 am and 5 pm on any working day; and b free of charge on an internet site maintained by or on behalf of that Office. 22 Interpretation In this subpart,— cultural redress property means each of the following properties, and each property means the land of that name described in Schedule 1 : Properties vested in fee simple a Kahumaro whenua: b Miro Street property: c Te Ruinga whenua: d Waihou property: e Waiorongomai property: f Waterford Road property: g Windridge property: Properties vested in fee simple to be administered as reserves h Omahu whenua: i Te Awe whenua: j Te Mokena Hou whenua: k Tumutumu whenua: l Wairakau whenua: Properties vested in fee simple subject to conservation covenant m Paewai: n Pukewhakataratara: o Takaihuehue: p Wahine Rock property: Properties jointly vested in fee simple subject to conservation covenant q Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera: r Tangitū jointly vested property means each of the properties named in paragraphs (q) and (r) of the definition of cultural redress property Ngāti Maru Rūnanga Trust means the trust of that name established by a trust deed dated 15 October 2013 Ngāti Tamaterā Treaty Settlement Trust means the trust of that name established by a trust deed dated 22 October 2013 reserve property means each of the properties named in paragraphs (h) to (l) of the definition of cultural redress property. 23 Kahumaro whenua Despite section 20(1) of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the fee simple estate in the Kahumaro whenua vests in the trustees. After the vesting referred to in subsection (1) ,— a the Kahumaro whenua continues to be— i a soil conservation reserve subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941; and ii under the control and management of the Waikato Regional Council; and b the Kahumaro whenua must not be alienated by the trustees (except as provided in section 26 ) for so long as it remains a soil conservation reserve; but c section 20 (except subsection (3)) of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 ceases to apply to the property. If the Waikato Regional Council considers that all or any part of the Kahumaro whenua is no longer required as a soil conservation reserve, the Minister for the Environment may by notice in the Gazette declare that all or the part of the land is no longer— a a soil conservation reserve; or b subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941. To avoid doubt, if subsection (3) applies, the fee simple estate in all or the part of the Kahumaro whenua remains vested in the trustees. 24 Miro Street property The reservation of the Miro Street property as a local purpose (youth hostel) reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The fee simple estate in the Miro Street property vests in the trustees. 25 Te Ruinga whenua Despite section 20(1) of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the fee simple estate in the Te Ruinga whenua vests in the trustees. After the vesting referred to in subsection (1) ,— a the Te Ruinga whenua continues to be— i a soil conservation reserve subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941; and ii under the control and management of the Waikato Regional Council; and b the Te Ruinga whenua must not be alienated by the trustees (except as provided in subsection (5) or section 26 ) for so long as it remains a soil conservation reserve; but c section 20 (except subsection (3)) of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 ceases to apply to the property. If the Waikato Regional Council considers that all or any part of the Te Ruinga whenua is no longer required as a soil conservation reserve, the Minister for the Environment may by notice in the Gazette declare that all or the part of the land is no longer— a a soil conservation reserve; or b subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941. To avoid doubt, if subsection (3) applies, the fee simple estate in all or the part of the Te Ruinga whenua remains vested in the trustees. Subsections (1) to (4) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the council with a registrable right of way easement in gross on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.8 of the documents schedule. 26 Transfer of Te Ruinga whenua and Kahumaro whenua if trustees change This section applies to the Te Ruinga whenua and the Kahumaro whenua while the property is a soil conservation reserve subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941. The registered owners of the property may transfer the fee simple estate in the land in each site if— a the transferors of the property are or were the trustees of the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust; and b the transferees are the trustees of that trust, after any new trustee has been appointed to the trust or any transferor has ceased to be a trustee of the trust; and c the instrument to transfer the property is accompanied by a certificate given by the transferees, or the transferees’ lawyer, verifying that paragraphs (a) and (b) apply. 27 Waihou property The Waihou property ceases to be a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in the Waihou property vests in the trustees. 28 Waiorongomai property The Waiorongomai property (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in the Waiorongomai property vests in the trustees. 29 Waterford Road property The fee simple estate in the Waterford Road property vests in the trustees. 30 Windridge property The Windridge property (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in the Windridge property vests in the trustees. 31 Omahu whenua The reservation of the Omahu whenua as a recreation reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The fee simple estate in the Omahu whenua vests in the trustees. The Omahu whenua is declared a reserve and classified as a recreation reserve subject to section 17 of the Reserves Act 1977. The reserve is named Omahu Recreation Reserve. The council is the administering body of the reserve, and the Reserves Act 1977 applies to the reserve as if the reserve were vested in the council under section 26 of that Act. Subsections (1) to (5) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the council with a registrable easement in gross for a right of way and rights to convey and drain water on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.7 of the documents schedule. Despite the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977, the easement— a is enforceable in accordance with its terms; and b is to be treated as having been granted in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977. Despite the vesting of the Omahu whenua by subsection (2) ,— a the flood protection assets in or on the Omahu whenua that are owned by the Waikato Regional Council immediately before the vesting remain the property of that Council; and b the powers and responsibilities of the Waikato Regional Council under the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 continue, including— i maintaining, accessing, repairing, and constructing flood protection assets owned by the Waikato Regional Council in or on the Omahu whenua; and ii accessing flood protection assets owned by the Waikato Regional Council in or on land adjoining the Omahu whenua. The parties must use reasonable endeavours before the settlement date to enter into a memorandum of understanding that sets out the process they will apply in order to notify and agree access arrangements under which the Waikato Regional Council exercises its rights to access the Omahu whenua and the adjacent land for the purpose of carrying out its flood protection responsibilities. Before the Waikato Regional Council exercises a power or responsibility described in subsection (7A)(b) , the Council must— a give reasonable notice to the trustees of the access required for the Council’s planned flood protection works; and b advise the trustees on the scope and timing of its proposal; and c unless the Council considers that the urgency of the circumstances precludes it, discuss any matters of concern to the trustees with them, with a view to resolving those concerns before accessing the land of the trustees. Despite the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977, the easement— a is enforceable in accordance with its terms; and b is to be treated as having been granted in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977. 32 Te Awe whenua The reservation of the part of the Te Awe whenua that is a local purpose (water conservation) reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The reservation of the part of the Te Awe whenua that is a local purpose (quarry) reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The fee simple estate in the Te Awe whenua vests in the trustees. The Te Awe whenua is declared a reserve and classified as a local purpose (water conservation) reserve subject to section 23 of the Reserves Act 1977. The reserve is named Te Awe Local Purpose (Water Conservation) Reserve. The council is the administering body of the reserve, and the Reserves Act 1977 applies to the reserve as if the reserve were vested in the council under section 26 of that Act. Subsections (1) to (6) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the council with a registrable easement in gross for a right of way and rights to convey and drain water on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.7 of the documents schedule. Despite the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977, the easement— a is enforceable in accordance with its terms; and b is to be treated as having been granted in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977. 33 Te Mokena Hou whenua The reservation of the Te Mokena Hou whenua (being Te Aroha Mountain Scenic Reserve) as a scenic reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The fee simple estate in the Te Mokena Hou whenua vests in the trustees. The Te Mokena Hou whenua is declared a reserve and classified as a scenic reserve for the purposes specified in section 19(1)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977. The reserve is named Te Mokena Hou Scenic Reserve. The council is the administering body of the reserve as if the council were appointed to control and manage the reserve under section 28 of the Reserves Act 1977. 34 Future interests relating to Te Mokena Hou whenua reserve land In this section and section 35 , Te Mokena Hou whenua reserve land and reserve land mean all or the part of the Te Mokena Hou whenua that remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977. This section applies to the Te Mokena Hou whenua reserve land, but only while the trustees are the owners and the council is the administering body of that land. Despite the council being the administering body, the trustees may, as if they were the administering body of the reserve land,— a accept, grant, or decline to grant any interest in land that affects the reserve land; or b renew or vary such an interest. If a person wishes to obtain an interest in land in the reserve land, or renew or vary such an interest, the person must apply under this section, in writing, through the council. The council must— a advise the trustees of any application received under subsection (4) ; and b undertake the administrative processes required by the Reserves Act 1977 in relation to each application. Before the trustees determine an application, the trustees must consult the council. The council may— a accept, grant, or decline to grant an interest that is not an interest in land that affects the reserve land; or b renew or vary such an interest. The Reserves Act 1977, except section 59A of that Act, applies to the accepting, granting, or declining of any interests under subsection (3) or (7) , or the renewing or varying of such interests. 35 Administration of Te Mokena Hou whenua reserve land This section applies only while the trustees are the owners of the reserve land. The trustees and the council may jointly— a agree that the council no longer be the administering body of the reserve land; and b notify the Minister of Conservation (the Minister ) in writing of the agreement. The Minister must, not later than 20 working days after receiving the notice, publish a notice in the Gazette declaring that— a the council is no longer the administering body of the reserve land; and b the trustees are the administering body of the reserve land. The Minister may, at the Minister’s sole discretion, revoke the appointment of the council as the administering body of the reserve land if requested in writing to do so by the trustees or the council. Before making a decision under subsection (4) , the Minister must consult the trustees and the council. When the Minister has determined a request, the Minister must— a notify the trustees and the council in writing of the Minister’s decision; and b if the Minister decides to revoke the appointment of the council as the administering body of the reserve land, publish a notice in the Gazette not later than 20 working days after giving notice under paragraph (a) declaring that— i the council is no longer the administering body of the reserve land; and ii the trustees are the administering body of the reserve land. The trustees are the administering body of the reserve land on and from the date on which a notice is published under subsection (3) or (6)(b) . 36 Tumutumu whenua The reservation of the Tumutumu whenua as a recreation reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The fee simple estate in the Tumutumu whenua vests in the trustees. The Tumutumu whenua is declared a reserve and classified as a recreation reserve subject to section 17 of the Reserves Act 1977. The reserve is named Tumutumu Recreation Reserve. The council is the administering body of the reserve, and the Reserves Act 1977 applies to the reserve as if the reserve were vested in the council under section 26 of that Act. Subsections (1) to (5) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the council with a registrable easement in gross for a right of way and rights to convey and drain water on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.7 of the documents schedule. Despite the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977, the easement— a is enforceable in accordance with its terms; and b is to be treated as having been granted in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977. 37 Wairakau whenua The reservation of the Wairakau whenua (being part of Wairakau Scenic Reserve) as a scenic reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked. The fee simple estate in the Wairakau whenua vests in the trustees. The Wairakau whenua is declared a reserve and classified as a scenic reserve for the purposes specified in section 19(1)(a) of the Reserves Act 1977. The reserve is named Wairakau Scenic Reserve. 38 Paewai Paewai (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in Paewai vests in the trustees. Subsections (1) and (2) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the Crown with a registrable covenant in relation to Paewai on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.1 of the documents schedule. The covenant is to be treated as a conservation covenant for the purposes of— a section 77 of the Reserves Act 1977; and b section 27 of the Conservation Act 1987. 39 Pukewhakataratara Pukewhakataratara (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in Pukewhakataratara vests in the trustees. Subsections (1) and (2) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the Crown with— a a registrable covenant in relation to Pukewhakataratara on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.2 of the documents schedule; and b a registrable right of way easement in gross on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.10 of the documents schedule. The covenant is to be treated as a conservation covenant for the purposes of— a section 77 of the Reserves Act 1977; and b section 27 of the Conservation Act 1987. 40 Takaihuehue Takaihuehue (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in Takaihuehue vests in the trustees. Subsections (1) and (2) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the Crown with a registrable covenant in relation to Takaihuehue on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.3 of the documents schedule. The covenant is to be treated as a conservation covenant for the purposes of— a section 77 of the Reserves Act 1977; and b section 27 of the Conservation Act 1987. 41 Wahine Rock property The Wahine Rock property (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in the Wahine Rock property vests in the trustees. Subsections (1) and (2) do not take effect until the trustees have provided the Crown with a registrable covenant in relation to the Wahine Rock property on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.4 of the documents schedule. The covenant is to be treated as a conservation covenant for the purposes of— a section 77 of the Reserves Act 1977; and b section 27 of the Conservation Act 1987. 42 Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera This section takes effect on and from the latest of the following dates: a the settlement date: b the settlement date under the Ngāti Maru settlement legislation: c the settlement date under the Ngāti Tamaterā settlement legislation. Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera vests as undivided third shares in the specified groups of trustees as tenants in common as follows: a a share vests in the trustees under this paragraph; and b a share vests in the trustees of the Ngāti Maru Rūnanga Trust under the Ngāti Maru settlement legislation; and c a share vests in the trustees of the Ngāti Tamaterā Treaty Settlement Trust under the Ngāti Tamaterā settlement legislation. Subsections (2) and (3) do not take effect until the trustees referred to in subsection (3) have jointly provided the Crown with a registrable covenant in relation to Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.6 of the documents schedule. The covenant is to be treated as a conservation covenant for the purposes of— a section 77 of the Reserves Act 1977; and b section 27 of the Conservation Act 1987. In this section and section 43 ,— Ngāti Maru settlement legislation means legislation that— a settles the historic claims of Ngāti Maru; and b provides for the vesting of an undivided one-third share of the fee simple estate in Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera and Tangitū in the trustees of the Ngāti Maru Rūnanga Trust Ngāti Tamaterā settlement legislation means legislation that— a settles the historical claims of Ngāti Tamaterā; and b provides for the vesting of an undivided one-third share of the fee simple estate in Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera and Tangitū in the trustees of the Ngāti Tamaterā Treaty Settlement Trust. 43 Tangitū This section takes effect on and from the latest of the following dates: a the settlement date: b the settlement date under the Ngāti Maru settlement legislation: c the settlement date under the Ngāti Tamaterā settlement legislation. Tangitū (being part of Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park) ceases to be part of the Park and a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987. The fee simple estate in Tangitū vests as undivided third shares in the specified groups of trustees as tenants in common as follows: a a share vests in the trustees under this paragraph; and b a share vests in the trustees of the Ngāti Maru Rūnanga Trust under the Ngāti Maru settlement legislation; and c a share vests in the trustees of the Ngāti Tamaterā Treaty Settlement Trust under the Ngāti Tamaterā settlement legislation. Subsections (2) and (3) do not take effect until the trustees referred to in subsection (3) have jointly provided the Crown with— a a registrable covenant in relation to Tangitū on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.5 of the documents schedule; and b a registrable right of way easement in gross on the terms and conditions set out in part 5.9 of the documents schedule. The covenant is to be treated as a conservation covenant for the purposes of— a section 77 of the Reserves Act 1977; and b section 27 of the Conservation Act 1987. 44 Properties vest subject to or together with interests Each cultural redress property vested under this subpart is subject to, or has the benefit of, any interests listed for the property in the third column of the table in Schedule 1 . 45 Interests in land for certain reserve properties This section applies to all or the part of each reserve property listed in subsection (2) that remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 (the reserve land ), but only while the reserve land has an administering body that is treated as if the land were vested in it. The reserve properties are— a Omahu whenua: b Te Awe whenua: c Tumutumu whenua. If the reserve property is affected by an interest in land listed for the property in Schedule 1 , the interest applies as if the administering body were the grantor, or the grantee, as the case may be, of the interest in respect of the reserve land. Any interest in land that affects the reserve land must be dealt with for the purposes of registration as if the administering body were the registered owner of the reserve land. However, subsections (3) and (4) do not affect the registration of the easements referred to in sections 31(6), 32(7), and 36(6) . Subsections (3) and (4) continue to apply despite any subsequent transfer of the reserve land under section 55 . 46 Interests that are not interests in land This section applies if a cultural redress property is subject to an interest (other than an interest in land) that is listed for the property in Schedule 1 , and for which there is a grantor, whether or not the interest also applies to land outside the cultural redress property. The interest applies as if the owners of the cultural redress property were the grantor of the interest in respect of the property, except to the extent that subsection (3) applies. If all or part of the cultural redress property is reserve land to which section 45 applies, the interest applies as if the administering body of the reserve land were the grantor of the interest in respect of the reserve land. The interest applies— a until the interest expires or is terminated, but any subsequent transfer of the cultural redress property must be ignored in determining whether the interest expires or is or may be terminated; and b with any other necessary modifications; and c despite any change in status of the land in the property. 47 Registration of ownership This section applies to a cultural redress property vested in the trustees under this subpart. Subsection (3) applies to a cultural redress property (other than a jointly vested property or the Te Awe whenua), but only to the extent that the property is all of the land contained in a record of title for a fee simple estate. The Registrar-General must, on written application by an authorised person,— a register the trustees as the owners of the fee simple estate in the property; and b record any entry on the record of title and do anything else necessary to give effect to this subpart and to part 5 of the deed of settlement. Subsection (5) applies to— a a cultural redress property (other than a jointly vested property), but only to the extent that subsection (2) does not apply to the property: b the Te Awe whenua. The Registrar-General must, in accordance with a written application by an authorised person,— a create a record of title for the fee simple estate in the property in the name of the trustees; and b record on the record of title any interests that are registered, noted, or to be noted and that are described in the application. For a jointly vested property, the Registrar-General must, in accordance with a written application by an authorised person,— a create a record of title for an undivided third share of the fee simple estate in the property in the names of the trustees; and b record on the record of title any interests that are registered, noted, or to be noted and that are described in the application. Subsections (5) and (6) are subject to the completion of any survey necessary to create a record of title. A record of title must be created under this section as soon as is reasonably practicable after the date on which the property vests, but not later than— a 24 months after that date; or b any later date that is agreed in writing,— i in the case of a property other than a jointly vested property, by the Crown and the trustees; or ii in the case of a jointly vested property, by the Crown, the trustees, and the other persons in whom the property is jointly vested. In this section, authorised person means a person authorised by— a the chief executive of LINZ for the following properties: i Kahumaro whenua: ii Te Ruinga whenua: iii Waterford Road property: b the Director-General for all other properties. 48 Application of Part 4A of Conservation Act 1987 The vesting of the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property in the trustees under this subpart is a disposition for the purposes of Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but sections 24(2A), 24A, and 24AA of that Act do not apply to the disposition. Section 24 of the Conservation Act 1987 does not apply to the vesting of— a a reserve property; or b Kahumaro whenua; or c Te Ruinga whenua. If the reservation of a reserve property under this subpart is revoked for all or part of the property, the vesting of the property is no longer exempt from section 24 (except subsection (2A)) of the Conservation Act 1987 for all or that part of the property. If all or any part of the Kahumaro whenua or the Te Ruinga whenua ceases to be a soil conservation reserve subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 ( see sections 23(3) and 25(3) of this Act), the vesting of the property is no longer exempt from section 24 (except subsection (2A)) of the Conservation Act 1987 for all or that part of the property. Subsections (2) to (4) do not limit subsection (1) . 49 Matters to be recorded on record of title The Registrar-General must record on the record of title— a for a reserve property,— i that the land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but that section 24 of that Act does not apply; and ii that the land is subject to— A sections 48(3) and 53 ; and B section 45(4) , in the case of the Omahu whenua, the Te Awe whenua, and the Tumutumu whenua; and b for the Kahumaro whenua and the Te Ruinga whenua,— i that the land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but that section 24 of that Act does not apply; and ii that the land is subject to— A sections 26 and 48(4) ; and B section 23(2) , in the case of the Kahumaro whenua; and C section 25(2) , in the case of the Te Ruinga whenua; and c for any other cultural redress property, that the land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987. A notation made under subsection (1) that land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987 is to be treated as having been made in compliance with section 24D(1) of that Act. For a reserve property, if the reservation of the property under this subpart is revoked for— a all of the property, the Director-General must apply in writing to the Registrar-General to remove from the record of title for the property the notations that— i section 24 of the Conservation Act 1987 does not apply to the property; and ii the property is subject to sections 48(3) and 53 ; and iii the property is subject to section 45(4) , in the case of the Omahu whenua, the Te Awe whenua, and the Tumutumu whenua; or b part of the property, the Registrar-General must ensure that the notations referred to in paragraph (a) remain only on the record of title for the part of the property that remains a reserve. Subsections (5) and (6) apply if all or part of the Kahumaro whenua or the Te Ruinga whenua is declared to no longer be a soil conservation reserve subject to the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 ( see sections 23(3) and 25(3) of this Act). If all of the property ceases to be a soil conservation reserve, a person authorised by the chief executive of the Ministry Secretary for the Environment must apply in writing to the Registrar-General to remove from the record of title for the property the notations that— a section 24 of the Conservation Act 1987 does not apply to the property; and b the property is subject to sections 26 and 48(4) ; and c the property is subject to section 23(2) , in the case of the Kahumaro whenua; and. d the property is subject to section 25(2) , in the case of the Te Ruinga whenua. If part of the property ceases to be a soil conservation reserve, the Registrar-General must ensure that the notations referred to in subsection (5) remain only on the record of title for the part of the property that remains a soil conservation reserve. The Registrar-General must comply with an application received in accordance with subsection (3)(a) or (5) . In this section, Secretary for the Environment has the meaning given to the term Secretary in section 2 of the Environment Act 1986. 50 Application of other enactments The Crown Minerals Act 1991 applies, subject to subpart 2 of Part 3 , in relation to the vesting of the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property under this subpart. The permission of a local authority under section 348 of the Local Government Act 1974 is not required for laying out, forming, granting, or reserving a private road, private way, or right of way required to fulfil the terms of the deed of settlement in relation to a cultural redress property. Sections 24 and 25 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply to the revocation, under this subpart, of the reserve status of a cultural redress property. Section 11 and Part 10 of the Resource Management Act 1991 do not apply to— a the vesting of the fee simple estate in a cultural redress property under this subpart; or b any matter incidental to, or required for the purpose of, the vesting. 51 Names of Crown protected areas discontinued Subsection (2) applies to the land, or the part of the land, in a cultural redress property that, immediately before the date on which the property vests, was all or part of a Crown protected area. The official geographic name of the Crown protected area is discontinued in respect of the land, or the part of the land, and the Board must amend the Gazetteer accordingly. In this section, Board , Crown protected area , Gazetteer , and official geographic name have the meanings given in section 4 of the New Zealand Geographic Board (Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa) Act 2008. 52 Application of other enactments to reserve properties The trustees are the administering body of a reserve property, except as provided for in sections 31, 32, 33, and 36 . Sections 78(1)(a), 79 to 81, and 88 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply in relation to a reserve property. If the reservation of a reserve property under this subpart is revoked under section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977 for all or part of the property, section 25(2) of that Act applies to the revocation, but not the rest of section 25 of that Act. A reserve property is not a Crown protected area under the New Zealand Geographic Board (Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa) Act 2008, despite anything in that Act. A reserve property must not have a name assigned to it or have its name changed under section 16(10) of the Reserves Act 1977 without the written consent of the owners of the property, and section 16(10A) of that Act does not apply to the proposed name. While the council is the administering body of 1 or more of the Omahu whenua, the Te Awe whenua, the Te Mokena Hou whenua, or the Tumutumu whenua (the properties ),— a subsection (2) does not apply to the properties; and b the council must, to the extent that it is reasonably practicable to distinguish the revenue derived from the properties from any other revenue received by the council,— i hold the revenue received from the properties by the council in its capacity as the administering body; and ii account for that revenue separately from any other revenue of the council; and iii use that revenue only in relation to the properties that continue to be administered by the council. 53 Subsequent transfer of reserve land This section applies to all or the part of a reserve property that remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 after the property has vested in the trustees under this subpart. The fee simple estate in the reserve land may be transferred only in accordance with section 54 or 55 . In this section and sections 54 to 56 , reserve land means the land that remains a reserve as described in subsection (1) . 54 Transfer of reserve land to new administering body The registered owners of the reserve land may apply in writing to the Minister of Conservation for consent to transfer the fee simple estate in the reserve land to 1 or more persons (the new owners ). The Minister of Conservation must give written consent to the transfer if the registered owners satisfy the Minister that the new owners are able— a to comply with the requirements of the Reserves Act 1977; and b to perform the duties of an administering body under that Act. The Registrar-General must, upon receiving the required documents, register the new owners as the owners of the fee simple estate in the reserve land. The required documents are— a a transfer instrument to transfer the fee simple estate in the reserve land to the new owners, including a notification that the new owners are to hold the reserve land for the same reserve purposes as those for which it was held by the administering body immediately before the transfer; and b the written consent of the Minister of Conservation to the transfer of the reserve land; and c the written consent of the administering body of the reserve land, if the trustees are transferring the reserve land but are not the administering body; and d any other document required for the registration of the transfer instrument. The new owners, from the time of their registration under this section,— a are the administering body of the reserve land; and b hold the reserve land for the same reserve purposes as those for which it was held by the administering body immediately before the transfer. A transfer that complies with this section need not comply with any other requirements. 55 Transfer of reserve land if trustees change The registered owners of the reserve land may transfer the fee simple estate in the reserve land if— a the transferors of the reserve land are or were the trustees of a trust; and b the transferees are the trustees of the same trust, after any new trustee has been appointed to the trust or any transferor has ceased to be a trustee of the trust; and c the instrument to transfer the reserve land is accompanied by a certificate given by the transferees, or the transferees' lawyer, verifying that paragraphs (a) and (b) apply. 56 Reserve land not to be mortgaged The owners of reserve land must not mortgage, or give a security interest in, the reserve land. 57 Saving of bylaws, etc, in relation to reserve properties This section applies to any bylaw, or any prohibition or restriction on use or access, that an administering body or the Minister of Conservation made or imposed under the Conservation Act 1987 or the Reserves Act 1977 in relation to a reserve property before the property was vested in the trustees under this subpart. The bylaw, prohibition, or restriction remains in force until it expires or is revoked under the Conservation Act 1987 or the Reserves Act 1977. 58 Interpretation In this subpart,— agreed date means the date or dates specified under the agreed terms for the vesting of all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land agreed terms means the terms and conditions under which any Te Aroha Domain land vests under this subpart as agreed by— a the Crown; and b the trustees; and c the council (except if section 60(1)(c) applies) joint management body means the body established by section 72 Minister means the Minister of Conservation reserve land means all or any part of the vested land that remains a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 Te Aroha Domain land has the meaning given in section 59(3) vested land means all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land that is vested in the trustees under this subpart. 59 Record of title for Te Aroha Domain land to be noted The Registrar-General must, as soon as is reasonably practicable after the settlement date, note on the record of title for the Te Aroha Domain land that this subpart applies to the land in the record of title. However, if the fee simple estate in all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land vests in the trustees in accordance with this subpart, the Registrar-General must remove the notation made under subsection (1) from the record of title for the land that has vested. In this subpart, Te Aroha Domain land means the land described by that name in Schedule 2 or as may be resurveyed from time to time on a survey plan approved by LINZ. 60 Te Aroha Domain land may be vested in trustees This section applies if— a the council resolves that it considers that the reservation of all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land as a reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 should be revoked; or b the council resolves that it considers that all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land should vest in the trustees subject to the land continuing to be a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977; or c the vesting of all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land in the council is cancelled under section 27 of the Reserves Act 1977. The Minister, after consulting the council and trustees as relevant, must decide whether the land to be vested in the trustees— a is no longer required as a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977; or b should continue to be a reserve under that Act. If subsection (2)(a) applies, on the agreed date and in accordance with the agreed terms,— a the reservation of all or the part of the Te Aroha Domain land as a reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked; and b the fee simple estate in that land vests in the trustees. If subsection (2)(b) applies, on the agreed date and in accordance with the agreed terms,— a the reservation of all or the part of the Te Aroha Domain land as a reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked; and b the fee simple estate in that land vests in the trustees; and c the land is declared a reserve and classified according to the classification specified in the agreed terms and subject to the Reserves Act 1977. If subsection (4) applies, the administering body is one of the following, as specified in the agreed terms: a the trustees: b the council, as if it were appointed to control and manage the reserve under section 28 of the Reserves Act 1977: c the council, and the Reserves Act 1977 applies as if the reserve were vested in the council under section 26 of that Act: d the joint management body. If subsection (1)(c) applies, on the agreed date and in accordance with the agreed terms, the reservation of all or the part of the Te Aroha Domain land as a reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977 is revoked and— a the fee simple estate in that land vests in the trustees; or b the fee simple estate in that land vests in the trustees and the land is declared a reserve and classified according to the classification specified in the agreed terms and subject to the Reserves Act 1977. If subsection (6)(b) applies, the trustees are the administering body of the reserve. 61 Notification in Gazette The Minister must publish a notice in the Gazette as soon as practicable after the date on which all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land vests in the trustees. The notice must specify— a the legal description of the land; and b the date on which the land vested; and c if the land has been vested as a reserve subject to the Reserves Act 1977,— i the reserve classification under that Act for the land; and ii the name of the reserve; and iii the administering body of the reserve. 62 Land vests subject to or together with interests The vested land is subject to, or has the benefit of, any interests— a that apply to the land immediately before its vesting: b that are required to be granted under the agreed terms. 63 Interests in land if Te Aroha Domain land is to be administered as reserve This section applies to the reserve land, but only if the administering body of the reserve land— a is the joint management body; or b is the council, if it is treated as if the reserve land were vested in it. If the reserve land is affected by an interest in land at the time the land vests, the interest applies as if the administering body were the grantor, or the grantee, as the case may be, of the interest in respect of the reserve land. Any interest in land that affects the reserve land must be dealt with for the purposes of registration as if the joint management body or the council, as the case may be, were the registered owner of the reserve land. However, subsections (2) and (3) do not affect the registration of an interest required to be granted by the trustees under the agreed terms. Subsections (2) and (3) continue to apply to the reserve land despite any subsequent transfer of the land under section 76 . 64 Interests that are not interests in land This section applies if the vested land is subject to an interest (other than an interest in land) at the time the land vests, and for which there is a grantor, whether or not the interest also applies to land outside the vested land. The interest applies as if the trustees were the grantor of the interest in respect of the vested land, except to the extent that subsection (3) applies. If the vested land is reserve land to which section 63 applies, the interest applies as if the administering body of the reserve land were the grantor of the interest in respect of the reserve land. The interest applies— a until the interest expires or is terminated, but any subsequent transfer of the vested land must be ignored in determining whether the interest expires or is or may be terminated; and b with any other necessary modifications; and c despite any change in status of the vested land. 65 Registration of ownership Subsection (2) applies to the extent that the vested land is all of the land contained in a record of title for a fee simple estate. The Registrar-General must, on written application by an authorised person,— a register the trustees as the owners of the fee simple estate in the vested land; and b record any entry on the record of title and do anything else necessary to give effect to this subpart and to part 5 of the deed of settlement. Subsection (4) applies to the vested land to the extent that subsection (2) does not apply to the land. The Registrar-General must, in accordance with a written application by an authorised person,— a create a record of title for the fee simple estate in the vested land in the name of the trustees; and b record on the record of title any interests that are registered, noted, or to be noted and that are described in the application. Subsection (4) is subject to the completion of any survey necessary to create a record of title. A written application under subsection (2) or (4) must include a copy of the notice published in the Gazette under section 61 . A record of title must be created under this section as soon as is reasonably practicable after the date on which the land vests. In this section, authorised person means a person authorised by the Director-General. 66 Matters to be recorded on record of title for vested land The Registrar-General must record on the record of title for the vested land that the land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987. If the vested land is reserve land, the Registrar-General must also record on the record of title for that land that the land is subject to— a section 74 ; and b section 63(3) , in the case of land with an administering body referred to in section 63(1) . A notation made under subsection (1) that the vested land is subject to Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987 is to be treated as having been made in compliance with section 24D(1) of that Act. If a body referred to in section 63(1) is no longer the administering body of the reserve land, the Director-General must apply in writing to the Registrar-General to remove from the record of title for the land the notation that the land is subject to section 63(3) . If the reservation of the vested land under this subpart is revoked for— a all of the land, the Director-General must apply in writing to the Registrar-General to remove from the record of title for the land the notations that— i the land is subject to section 74 ; and ii the land is subject to section 63(3) , if relevant and if that notation has not been removed under subsection (4) ; or b part of the land, the Registrar-General must ensure that the notations referred to in paragraph (a) remain only on the record of title for the part of the land that remains a reserve. The Registrar-General must comply with an application received in accordance with subsection (4) or (5)(a) . 67 Application of other enactments The vesting of the fee simple estate in all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land in the trustees is a disposition for the purposes of Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but sections 24(2A), 24A, and 24AA of that Act do not apply to the disposition. The Crown Minerals Act 1991 applies, subject to subpart 2 of Part 3 , in relation to the vesting of the fee simple estate in all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land in the trustees. The permission of a council under section 348 of the Local Government Act 1974 is not required for laying out, forming, granting, or reserving a private road, private way, or right of way required to fulfil the agreed terms. Sections 24 and 25 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply to the revocation, under this subpart, of the reserve status of all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land to be vested in the trustees. Section 11 and Part 10 of the Resource Management Act 1991 do not apply to— a the vesting of the fee simple estate in all or any part of the Te Aroha Domain land under this subpart; or b any matter incidental to, or required for the purpose of, the vesting. 68 Application of other enactments to reserve land If the trustees are the administering body of the reserve land, sections 78(1)(a), 79 to 81, and 88 of the Reserves Act 1977 do not apply in relation to that land. If the reservation of the reserve land under this subpart is revoked under section 24 of the Reserves Act 1977 for all or part of the land, section 25(2) of that Act applies to the revocation, but not the rest of section 25 of that Act. The reserve land is not a Crown protected area under the New Zealand Geographic Board (Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa) Act 2008, despite anything in that Act. The reserve land must not have a name assigned to it or have its name changed under section 16(10) of the Reserves Act 1977 without the written consent of the owners of the property, and section 16(10A) of that Act does not apply to the proposed name. If the joint management body is the administering body of the reserve land,— a Part 4 of the Reserves Act 1977, which relates to financial provisions, applies to the joint management body as if it were a local authority; and b the council must, to the extent that it is reasonably practicable to distinguish the revenue derived from the reserve land from any other revenue received by the council,— i hold the revenue received from the reserve land by the joint management body in its capacity as the administering body; and ii account for that revenue separately from any other revenue of the council; and iii use that revenue, under the direction of the joint management body, but only in relation to the reserve land that continues to be administered by the joint management body. If the council is the administering body of the reserve land, the council must, to the extent that it is reasonably practicable to distinguish the revenue derived from that land from any other revenue received by the council,— a hold the revenue received from the reserve land by the council in its capacity as the administering body; and b account for that revenue separately from any other revenue of the council; and c use that revenue only in relation to the reserve land that continues to be administered by the council. 69 Reserve land administered by council Sections 70 and 71 apply if the council is to be the administering body of the reserve land as if the council were appointed to control and manage the reserve land under section 28 of the Reserves Act 1977. 70 Future interests relating to reserve land This section applies to the reserve land, but only while the trustees are the owners and the council is the administering body of that land. Despite the council being the administering body, the trustees may, as if they were the administering body of the reserve land,— a accept, grant, or decline to grant any interest in land that affects the reserve land, or renew or vary such an interest; and b renew or vary any existing interest in land. A person must apply under this section, in writing, through the council— a to obtain a new interest in land that affects the reserve land, or renew or vary such an interest; and b to renew or vary an existing interest in land. The council must— a advise the trustees of any application received under subsection (3) ; and b undertake the administrative processes required by the Reserves Act 1977 in relation to each application. Before the trustees determine an application, the trustees must consult the council. The council may— a accept, grant, or decline to grant an interest that is not an interest in land and that affects the reserve land, or renew or vary such an interest; and b renew or vary any existing interest that is not an interest in land. The Reserves Act 1977, except section 59A of that Act, applies to the accepting, granting, or declining of any interests under subsection (2) or (6) , or the renewing or varying of such interests. In this section, existing interest means an interest that affects the reserve land at the time it vests in the trustees. 71 Administration of reserve land This section applies only while the trustees are the owners of the reserve land. The trustees and the council may jointly— a agree that the council no longer be the administering body of the reserve land; and b notify the Minister in writing of that agreement. The Minister must, not later than 20 working days after receiving the notice, publish a notice in the Gazette declaring that— a the council is no longer the administering body of the reserve land; and b the trustees are the administering body of the reserve land. The Minister may, at the Minister’s sole discretion, revoke the appointment of the council as the administering body of the reserve land if requested in writing to do so by the trustees or the council. Before making a decision under subsection (4) , the Minister must consult the trustees and the council. When the Minister has determined a request, the Minister must— a notify the trustees and the council in writing of the Minister’s decision; and b if the Minister decides to revoke the appointment of the council as the administering body of the reserve land, publish a notice in the Gazette not later than 20 working days after giving notice under paragraph (a) , declaring that— i the council is no longer the administering body of the reserve land; and ii the trustees are the administering body of the reserve land. The trustees are the administering body of the reserve land on and from the date on which a notice is published under subsection (3) or (6)(b) . 72 Reserve land administered jointly This section applies if the reserve land is to be administered jointly by the trustees and the council. A joint management body is established for the reserve land. The following are appointers for the purposes of this section: a the trustees; and b the council. Each appointer must appoint 2 members to the joint management body. At least 1 of the members appointed by the council must be an elected member of the council. A member is appointed only if the appointer gives written notice with the following details to the other appointers: a the full name, address, and other contact details of the member; and b the date on which the appointment takes effect, which must be not earlier than the date of the notice. An appointment ends after 3 years or when the appointer replaces the member by making another appointment. Despite subsection (7) , each term of a member referred to in subsection (5) ends on the same day as the term of office of that member ends before a triennial general election under the Local Electoral Act 2001. A member may be appointed, reappointed, or discharged at the discretion of the appointer. 73 Application of Reserves Act 1977 to joint management body If the joint management body is the administering body of the reserve land, the Reserves Act 1977 applies to the reserve land as if the reserve land were vested in that body (as if the body were trustees) under section 26 of that Act. However, the joint management body may exercise or perform, as if it were a local authority, a power or function that the Minister has delegated to local authorities under section 10 of the Reserves Act 1977, but only to the extent that the power or function is relevant to the reserve land. Except as provided in subsections (1) and (2) , sections 32 to 34 of the Reserves Act 1977 apply to the joint management body (the body ) as if it were a board. The following provisions apply despite the specified requirements of the Reserves Act 1977: a despite section 32(1) of that Act, the first meeting of the body must be held not later than 6 months after the date on which the land vests in the trustees: b despite section 32(5) of that Act, the trustees must appoint the chairperson and the council must appoint the deputy chairperson of the body: c despite section 32(7) of that Act,— i no casting vote may be exercised and the members must strive to reach a consensus; but ii if a consensus cannot be reached within a reasonable time, a decision must be made by majority vote: d despite section 32(8) and (9) of that Act, all members must be present for all business of the body: e despite section 32(10) of that Act, the members must strive to reach a consensus but, if a consensus cannot be reached within a reasonable time, the question must be determined by majority vote: f despite section 41(1) of that Act, any management plan in force for the Te Aroha Domain land immediately before the date on which the land vests continues to apply to that land. In this section, consensus means the absence of a formally recorded dissent by a member at a meeting of the body. 74 Subsequent transfer of reserve land The fee simple estate in the reserve land may be transferred only in accordance with section 75 or 76 . 75 Transfer of reserve land to new administering body The registered owners of the reserve land may apply in writing to the Minister for consent to transfer the fee simple estate in the reserve land to 1 or more persons (the new owners ). The Minister must give written consent to the transfer if the registered owners satisfy the Minister that the new owners are able— a to comply with the requirements of the Reserves Act 1977; and b to perform the duties of an administering body under that Act. The Registrar-General must, upon receiving the required documents, register the new owners as the owners of the fee simple estate in the reserve land. The required documents are— a a transfer instrument to transfer the fee simple estate in the reserve land to the new owners, including a notification that the new owners are to hold the reserve land for the same reserve purposes as those for which it was held by the administering body immediately before the transfer; and b the written consent of the Minister to the transfer of the reserve land; and c the written consent of the administering body of the reserve land, if the trustees are transferring the reserve land and are not the administering body; and d any other document required for the registration of the transfer instrument. The new owners, from the time of their registration under this section,— a are the administering body of the reserve land; and b hold the reserve land for the same reserve purposes as those for which it was held by the administering body immediately before the transfer. A transfer that complies with this section need not comply with any other requirements. 76 Transfer of reserve land if trustees change The registered owners of the reserve land may transfer the fee simple estate in the reserve land if— a the transferors of the reserve land are or were the trustees of a trust; and b the transferees are the trustees of the same trust, after any new trustee has been appointed to the trust or any transferor has ceased to be a trustee of the trust; and c the instrument to transfer the reserve land is accompanied by a certificate given by the transferees, or the transferees' lawyer, verifying that paragraphs (a) and (b) apply. 77 Reserve land not to be mortgaged The owners of the reserve land must not mortgage, or give a security interest in, the reserve land. 78 Saving of bylaws, etc, in relation to reserve land This section applies to any bylaw, or any prohibition or restriction on use or access, that an administering body or the Minister of Conservation made or imposed under the Conservation Act 1987 or the Reserves Act 1977 in relation to the reserve land before the land was vested in the trustees under this subpart. The bylaw, prohibition, or restriction remains in force until it expires or is revoked under the Conservation Act 1987 or the Reserves Act 1977. 79 Interpretation In this subpart,— Conservation Board means a board established under section 6L of the Conservation Act 1987 New Zealand Conservation Authority means the Authority established by section 6A of the Conservation Act 1987 overlay area — a means the area that is declared under section 80(1) to be subject to the overlay classification; but b does not include an area that is declared under section 91(1) to be no longer subject to the overlay classification overlay classification means the application of this subpart to the overlay area protection principles , for the overlay area,— a means the principles agreed by the trustees and the Minister of Conservation, as set out for the area in part 1 of the documents schedule; and b includes any principles as they are amended by the written agreement of the trustees and the Minister of Conservation specified actions , for the overlay area, means the actions set out for the area in part 1 of the documents schedule statement of values , for the overlay area, means the statement— a made by Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu of their values relating to their cultural, historical, spiritual, and traditional association with the overlay area; and b set out in part 1 of the documents schedule. 80 Declaration of overlay classification and the Crown's acknowledgement The area described in Schedule 3 is declared to be subject to the overlay classification. The Crown acknowledges the statement of values for the overlay area. 81 Purposes of overlay classification The only purposes of the overlay classification are— a to require the New Zealand Conservation Authority and relevant Conservation Boards to comply with the obligations in section 83 ; and b to enable the taking of action under sections 84 to 89 . 82 Effect of protection principles The protection principles are intended to prevent the values stated in the statement of values for the overlay area from being harmed or diminished. 83 Obligations on New Zealand Conservation Authority and Conservation Boards When the New Zealand Conservation Authority or a Conservation Board considers a conservation management strategy, conservation management plan, or national park management plan that relates to the overlay area, the Authority or Board must have particular regard to— a the statement of values for the area; and b the protection principles for the area. Before approving a strategy or plan that relates to the overlay area, the New Zealand Conservation Authority or a Conservation Board must— a consult the trustees; and b have particular regard to the views of the trustees as to the effect of the strategy or plan on— i any matters in the implementation of the statement of values for the area; and ii any matters in the implementation of the protection principles for the area. If the trustees advise the New Zealand Conservation Authority in writing that they have significant concerns about a draft conservation management strategy in relation to the overlay area, the Authority must, before approving the strategy, give the trustees an opportunity to make submissions in relation to those concerns. 84 Noting of overlay classification in strategies and plans The application of the overlay classification to the overlay area must be noted in any conservation management strategy, conservation management plan, or national park management plan affecting the area. The noting of the overlay classification is— a for the purposes of public notice only; and b not an amendment to the strategy or plan for the purposes of section 17I of the Conservation Act 1987 or section 46 of the National Parks Act 1980. 85 Notification in Gazette The Minister of Conservation must notify in the Gazette , as soon as practicable after the settlement date,— a the declaration made by section 80 that the overlay classification applies to the overlay area; and b the protection principles for the overlay area. An amendment to the protection principles, as agreed by the trustees and the Minister of Conservation, must be notified by the Minister in the Gazette as soon as practicable after the amendment has been agreed in writing. The Director-General may notify in the Gazette any action (including any specified action) taken or intended to be taken under section 86 or 87 . 86 Actions by Director-General The Director-General must take action in relation to the protection principles that relate to the overlay area, including the specified actions. The Director-General retains complete discretion to determine the method and extent of the action to be taken. The Director-General must notify the trustees in writing of any action that the Director-General intends to take. 87 Amendment to strategies or plans The Director-General may initiate an amendment to a conservation management strategy, conservation management plan, or national park management plan to incorporate objectives for the protection principles that relate to the overlay area. The Director-General must consult relevant Conservation Boards before initiating the amendment. The amendment is an amendment for the purposes of section 17I(1) to (3) of the Conservation Act 1987 or section 46(1) to (4) of the National Parks Act 1980. 88 Regulations The Governor-General may, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Conservation, make regulations for 1 or more of the following purposes: a to provide for the implementation of objectives included in a strategy or plan under section 87(1) : b to regulate or prohibit activities or conduct by members of the public in relation to the overlay area: c to create offences for breaches of regulations made under paragraph (b) : d to prescribe the following fines for an offence referred to in paragraph (c) : i a fine not exceeding $5,000; and ii if the offence is a continuing one, an additional amount not exceeding $500 for every day on which the offence continues. Regulations made under this section are secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). 89 Bylaws The Minister of Conservation may make bylaws for 1 or more of the following purposes: a to provide for the implementation of objectives included in a strategy or plan under section 87(1) : b to regulate or prohibit activities or conduct by members of the public in relation to the overlay area: c to create offences for breaches of bylaws made under paragraph (b) : d to prescribe the following fines for an offence referred to in paragraph (c) : i a fine not exceeding $5,000; and ii if the offence is a continuing one, an additional amount not exceeding $500 for every day on which the offence continues. Bylaws made under this section are secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). 90 Effect of overlay classification on overlay area This section applies if, at any time, the overlay classification applies to any land in— a a national park under the National Parks Act 1980; or b a conservation area under the Conservation Act 1987; or c a reserve under the Reserves Act 1977. The overlay classification does not affect— a the status of the land as a national park, conservation area, or reserve; or b the classification or purpose of a reserve. 91 Termination of overlay classification The Governor-General may, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Conservation, declare that all or part of the overlay area is no longer subject to the overlay classification. The Minister of Conservation must not make a recommendation for the purposes of subsection (1) unless— a the trustees and the Minister of Conservation have agreed in writing that the overlay classification is no longer appropriate for the relevant area; or b the relevant area is to be, or has been, disposed of by the Crown; or c the responsibility for managing the relevant area is to be, or has been, transferred to a different Minister of the Crown or the Commissioner of Crown Lands. The Crown must take reasonable steps to ensure that the trustees continue to have input into the management of a relevant area if— a subsection (2)(c) applies; or b there is a change in the statutory management regime that applies to all or part of the overlay area. The Minister of Conservation must ensure that an order made under this section is published in the Gazette . 92 Exercise of powers and performance of functions and duties The overlay classification does not affect, and must not be taken into account by, any person exercising a power or performing a function or duty under an enactment or a bylaw. A person, in considering a matter or making a decision or recommendation under legislation or a bylaw, must not give greater or lesser weight to the values stated in the statement of values for the overlay area than that person would give if the area were not subject to the overlay classification. Subsection (2) does not limit subsection (1) . This section is subject to the other provisions of this subpart. 93 Rights not affected The overlay classification does not— a affect the lawful rights or interests of a person who is not a party to the deed of settlement; or b have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, the overlay area. This section is subject to the other provisions of this subpart. 94 Interpretation In this subpart,— relevant consent authority , for a statutory area, means a consent authority of a region or district that contains, or is adjacent to, the statutory area statement of association , for a statutory area, means the statement— a made by Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu of their particular cultural, historical, spiritual, and traditional association with the statutory area; and b set out in part 2 of the documents schedule statutory acknowledgement means the acknowledgement made by the Crown in section 95 in respect of the statutory areas, on the terms set out in this subpart statutory area means an area described in Schedule 4 , the general location of which is indicated on the deed plan for that area statutory plan — a means a district plan, regional coastal plan, regional plan, regional policy statement, or proposed policy statement as defined in section 43AA of the Resource Management Act 1991; and b includes a proposed plan, as defined in section 43AAC of that Act. 95 Statutory acknowledgement by the Crown The Crown acknowledges the statement of association for the statutory areas. 96 Purposes of statutory acknowledgement The only purposes of the statutory acknowledgement are— a to require relevant consent authorities, the Environment Court, and Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga to have regard to the statutory acknowledgement, in accordance with sections 97 to 99 ; and b to require relevant consent authorities to record the statutory acknowledgement on statutory plans that relate to the statutory areas and to provide summaries of resource consent applications or copies of notices of applications to the trustees, in accordance with sections 100 and 101 ; and c to enable the trustees and any member of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to cite the statutory acknowledgement as evidence of the association of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu with a statutory area, in accordance with section 102 . 97 Relevant consent authorities to have regard to statutory acknowledgement This section applies in relation to an application for a resource consent for an activity within, adjacent to, or directly affecting a statutory area. On and from the effective date, a relevant consent authority must have regard to the statutory acknowledgement relating to the statutory area in deciding, under section 95E of the Resource Management Act 1991, whether the trustees are affected persons in relation to the activity. Subsection (2) does not limit the obligations of a relevant consent authority under the Resource Management Act 1991. 98 Environment Court to have regard to statutory acknowledgement This section applies to proceedings in the Environment Court in relation to an application for a resource consent for an activity within, adjacent to, or directly affecting a statutory area. On and from the effective date, the Environment Court must have regard to the statutory acknowledgement relating to the statutory area in deciding, under section 274 of the Resource Management Act 1991, whether the trustees are persons with an interest in the proceedings greater than that of the general public. Subsection (2) does not limit the obligations of the Environment Court under the Resource Management Act 1991. 99 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and Environment Court to have regard to statutory acknowledgement This section applies to an application made under section 44, 56, or 61 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 for an authority to undertake an activity that will or may modify or destroy an archaeological site within a statutory area. On and from the effective date, Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga must have regard to the statutory acknowledgement relating to the statutory area in exercising its powers under section 48, 56, or 62 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 in relation to the application. On and from the effective date, the Environment Court must have regard to the statutory acknowledgement relating to the statutory area— a in determining whether the trustees are persons directly affected by the decision; and b in determining, under section 59(1) or 64(1) of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014, an appeal against a decision of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga in relation to the application. In this section, archaeological site has the meaning given in section 6 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014. 100 Recording statutory acknowledgement on statutory plans On and from the effective date, each relevant consent authority must attach information recording the statutory acknowledgement to all statutory plans that wholly or partly cover a statutory area. The information attached to a statutory plan must include— a a copy of sections 95 to 99, 101, and 102 ; and b descriptions of the statutory areas wholly or partly covered by the plan; and c the statement of association for each statutory area. The attachment of information to a statutory plan under this section is for the purpose of public information only and, unless adopted by the relevant consent authority as part of the statutory plan, the information is not— a part of the statutory plan; or b subject to the provisions of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991. 101 Provision of summary or notice to trustees Each relevant consent authority must, on and from the effective date, provide the following to the trustees for each resource consent application for an activity within, adjacent to, or directly affecting a statutory area: a if the application is received by the consent authority, a summary of the application; or b if notice of the application is served on the consent authority under section 145(10) of the Resource Management Act 1991, a copy of the notice. A summary provided under subsection (1)(a) must be the same as would be given to an affected person by limited notification under section 95B(4) of the Resource Management Act 1991 or as may be agreed between the trustees and the relevant consent authority. The summary must be provided— a as soon as is reasonably practicable after the relevant consent authority receives the application; but b before the relevant consent authority decides under section 95 of the Resource Management Act 1991 whether to notify the application. A copy of a notice must be provided under subsection (1)(b) not later than 10 working days after the day on which the consent authority receives the notice. The trustees may, by written notice to a relevant consent authority,— a waive the right to be provided with a summary or copy of a notice under this section; and b state the scope of that waiver and the period it applies for. This section does not affect the obligation of a relevant consent authority to decide,— a under section 95 of the Resource Management Act 1991, whether to notify an application: b under section 95E of that Act, whether the trustees are affected persons in relation to an activity. 102 Use of statutory acknowledgement The trustees and any member of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu may, as evidence of the association of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu with a statutory area, cite the statutory acknowledgement that relates to that area in submissions concerning activities within, adjacent to, or directly affecting the statutory area that are made to or before— a the relevant consent authorities; or b the Environment Court; or c Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga; or d the Environmental Protection Authority or a board of inquiry under Part 6AA of the Resource Management Act 1991. The content of a statement of association is not, because of the statutory acknowledgement, binding as fact on— a the bodies referred to in subsection (1) ; or b parties to proceedings before those bodies; or c any other person who is entitled to participate in those proceedings. However, the bodies and persons specified in subsection (2) may take the statutory acknowledgement into account. To avoid doubt,— a neither the trustees nor members of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu are precluded from stating that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu has an association with a statutory area that is not described in the statutory acknowledgement; and b the content and existence of the statutory acknowledgement do not limit any statement made. 103 Issuing and amending deed of recognition This section applies in respect of the statutory areas listed in Schedule 4 . The Minister of Conservation and the Director-General must issue a deed of recognition in the form set out in part 3 of the documents schedule for the statutory areas administered by the Department of Conservation. The Minister of Conservation and the Director-General may amend the deed of recognition, but only with the written consent of the trustees. 104 Exercise of powers and performance of functions and duties The statutory acknowledgement and the deed of recognition do not affect, and must not be taken into account by, a person exercising a power or performing a function or duty under an enactment or a bylaw. A person, in considering a matter or making a decision or recommendation under an enactment or a bylaw, must not give greater or lesser weight to the association of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu with a statutory area than that person would give if there were no statutory acknowledgement or deed of recognition for the statutory area. Subsection (2) does not limit subsection (1) . This section is subject to— a the other provisions of this subpart; and b any obligation imposed on the Minister of Conservation or the Director-General by the deed of recognition. 105 Rights not affected The statutory acknowledgement and the deed of recognition— a do not affect the lawful rights or interests of a person who is not a party to the deed of settlement; and b do not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, a statutory area. This section is subject to the other provisions of this subpart. 106 Amendment to Resource Management Act 1991 This section amends the Resource Management Act 1991. In Schedule 11, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 107 Interpretation In this subpart,— protocol — a means each of the following protocols issued under section 108(1)(a) : i the primary industries protocol: ii the taonga tūturu protocol: b includes any amendments made under section 108(1)(b) responsible Minister means the 1 or more Ministers who have responsibility under a protocol. 108 Issuing, amending, and cancelling protocols The responsible Minister— a must issue a protocol to the trustees on the terms set out in part 4 of the documents schedule; and b may amend or cancel that protocol. The responsible Minister may amend or cancel a protocol at the initiative of— a the trustees; or b the responsible Minister. The responsible Minister may amend or cancel a protocol only after consulting, and having particular regard to the views of, the trustees. 109 Protocols subject to rights, functions, and duties A protocol does not restrict— a the ability of the Crown to exercise its powers and perform its functions and duties in accordance with the law and Government policy, for example, the ability— i to introduce legislation and change Government policy; and ii to interact with or consult a person that the Crown considers appropriate, including any iwi, hapū, marae, whānau, or other representative of tangata whenua; or b the responsibilities of the responsible Minister or a department of State; or c the legal rights of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu or a representative entity. 110 Enforcement of protocols The Crown must comply with a protocol while it is in force. If the Crown fails to comply with a protocol without good cause, the trustees may enforce the protocol, subject to the Crown Proceedings Act 1950. Despite subsection (2) , damages or other forms of monetary compensation are not available as a remedy for a failure by the Crown to comply with a protocol. To avoid doubt,— a subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to guidelines developed for the implementation of a protocol; and b subsection (3) does not affect the ability of a court to award costs incurred by the trustees in enforcing the protocol under subsection (2) . 111 Primary industries protocol The chief executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries must note a summary of the terms of the primary industries protocol in the fisheries plan that affect the primary industries protocol area. The noting of the summary is— a for the purpose of public notice only; and b not an amendment to a fisheries plan for the purposes of section 11A of the Fisheries Act 1996. The primary industries protocol does not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, assets or other property rights (including in respect of fish, aquatic life, or seaweed) that are held, managed, or administered under any of the following enactments: a the Fisheries Act 1996: b the Maori Commercial Aquaculture Claims Settlement Act 2004: c the Maori Fisheries Act 2004: d the Treaty of Waitangi (Fisheries Claims) Settlement Act 1992. In this section,— fisheries plan means a plan approved or amended under section 11A of the Fisheries Act 1996 primary industries protocol area means the area shown on the map attached to the primary industries protocol, together with the adjacent waters. 112 Taonga tūturu protocol The taonga tūturu protocol does not have the effect of granting, creating, or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, taonga tūturu. In this section, taonga tūturu — a has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Protected Objects Act 1975; and b includes ngā taonga tūturu, as defined in section 2(1) of that Act. 113 Interpretation In this subpart,— deferred selection property means a property described in part 4 of the property redress schedule for which the requirements for transfer under the deed of settlement have been satisfied land holding agency means the land holding agency specified in part 4 of the property redress schedule. 114 The Crown may transfer properties To give effect to part 6 of the deed of settlement, the Crown (acting by and through the chief executive of the land holding agency) is authorised— a to transfer the fee simple estate in a deferred selection property to the trustees; and b to sign a transfer instrument or other document, or do anything else, as necessary to effect the transfer. Subsection (3) applies to a deferred selection property that is subject to a resumptive memorial recorded under any enactment listed in section 17(2) . As soon as is reasonably practicable after the date on which a deferred selection property is transferred to the trustees, the chief executive of the land holding agency must give written notice of that date to the chief executive of LINZ for the purposes of section 18 (which relates to the cancellation of resumptive memorials). 115 Records of title for deferred selection properties This section applies to each deferred selection property that is to be transferred to the trustees under section 114 . However, this section applies only to the extent that— a the property is not all of the land contained in a record of title for a fee simple estate; or b there is no record of title for the fee simple estate in all or part of the property. The Registrar-General must, in accordance with a written application by an authorised person,— a create a record of title for the fee simple estate in the property in the name of the Crown; and b record on the record of title any interests that are registered, noted, or to be noted and that are described in the application; but c omit any statement of purpose from the record of title. Subsection (3) is subject to the completion of any survey necessary to create a record of title. In this section and section 116 , authorised person means a person authorised by the chief executive of the land holding agency for the relevant property. 116 Authorised person may grant covenant for later creation of records of title For the purposes of section 115 , the authorised person may grant a covenant for the later creation of a record of title for a fee simple estate in a deferred selection property. Despite the Land Transfer Act 2017,— a the authorised person may request the Registrar-General to register the covenant under that Act by creating a record of title that records an interest; and b the Registrar-General must comply with the request. 117 Application of other enactments This section applies to the transfer to the trustees of the fee simple estate in a deferred selection property. The transfer is a disposition for the purposes of Part 4A of the Conservation Act 1987, but sections 24(2A), 24A, and 24AA of that Act do not apply to the disposition. The Crown Minerals Act 1991 applies subject to subpart 2 . The permission of a local authority under section 348 of the Local Government Act 1974 is not required for laying out, forming, granting, or reserving a private road, private way, or right of way required to fulfil the terms of the deed of settlement in relation to the transfer. Section 11 and Part 10 of the Resource Management Act 1991 do not apply to the transfer or to any matter incidental to, or required for the purpose of, the transfer. In exercising the powers conferred by section 114 , the Crown is not required to comply with any other enactment that would otherwise regulate or apply to the transfer. Subsection (6) is subject to subsections (2) and (3) . 118 Application and interpretation This subpart applies to— a the land vested in the trustees under subpart 1 of Part 2 ; and b the land vested in the trustees under subpart 2 of Part 2 ; and c land transferred to the trustees under section 114 ; and d the early release commercial property transferred to the trustees. In this subpart, unless the context otherwise requires,— actual amount means the amount payable in respect of vested minerals in accordance with sections 125 and 129 chief executive has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 Crown owned mineral has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 existing privilege has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 mineral has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 Minister has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 permit area means— a the area of land over which any prospecting, exploration, or mining permit is granted under the Crown Minerals Act 1991; or b the area of land over which an existing privilege exists privilege , in relation to any mineral,— a means an existing privilege; and b also means a prospecting, exploration, or mining permit granted under the Crown Minerals Act 1991, and its associated mining operations (within the meaning of section 2(1) of that Act) relevant land means land referred to in subsection (1) representative amount means the amount— a payable in accordance with section 125 ; and b calculated in accordance with section 126 royalties has the meaning given in section 2(1) of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 section 10 minerals means the minerals named in section 10 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 vested minerals means the minerals referred to in section 120(1) and (2) year means a period of 12 months beginning on 1 January and ending on 31 December. 119 Certain existing rights preserved The following privileges, rights, obligations, functions, and powers (including those preserved by the transitional provisions in Part 2 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991) continue as if section 120 had not been enacted: a privileges in existence immediately before— i the property is vested or transferred as referred to in section 120(1) ; or ii the transfer of the early release commercial property to the trustees: b rights that may be exercised under the Crown Minerals Act 1991 by the holders of those privileges or any other person: c subsequent rights and privileges granted to those holders or any other person following the exercise of the rights referred to in paragraph (b) (including those provided for by section 32 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991): d the obligations on those holders or any other person imposed by or under the Crown Minerals Act 1991: e the Crown’s performance and exercise of its functions and powers under the Crown Minerals Act 1991 in relation to any of the matters referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d) . 120 Vested minerals no longer to be reserved to the Crown Despite section 11 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991,— a when land referred to in section 118(1)(a) is vested in the trustees, any Crown owned minerals in that land (other than section 10 minerals) vest with the land: b when land referred to in section 118(1)(b) is vested in the trustees, any Crown owned minerals in that land (other than section 10 minerals) vest with the land: c when land referred to in section 118(1)(c) is transferred to the trustees, any Crown owned minerals in that land (other than section 10 minerals) transfer with the land. Despite section 11 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991, on the settlement date any Crown owned minerals (other than section 10 minerals) in the land referred to in section 118(1)(d) become the property of the trustees if, on that date, they own the land. However, if a share in any relevant land is vested in or transferred to the trustees, the trustees own a share of any Crown owned minerals (other than section 10 minerals) in the same proportion as the shares in which they own the relevant land. To avoid doubt, the vesting or transfer of land referred to in section 118(1) is subject to any mineral interests or rights to which, immediately before the commencement of this subpart, any person other than the Crown was entitled under the Land Transfer Act 2017 or any other Act, whether or not such interests or rights are recorded on the record of title for the land. 121 Application of Crown Minerals Act 1991 Nothing in this subpart— a limits section 10 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991; or b affects other lawful rights to subsurface minerals. Section 49A of the Crown Minerals Act 1991 applies to the land described in section 118(1) . 122 Notation of mineral ownership on records of title (other than for early release commercial property) This section, instead of section 86 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991, applies to land referred to in section 118(1)(a) to (c) at the time of its vesting or transfer. An instrument lodged in respect of that land must include a request to the Registrar-General to record on any record of title for the land that the land is subject to section 120 of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 . The Registrar-General must comply with a request received under subsection (2) . In this section, instrument means— a a written application lodged under section 47(3), (5), or (6) , as applicable, in respect of land referred to in section 118(1)(a) ; or b a written application lodged under section 65 in respect of land referred to in section 118(1)(b) ; or c a transfer instrument lodged in respect of land referred to in section 118(1)(c) . 123 Notation of mineral ownership on record of title for early release commercial property This section, instead of section 86 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991, applies to land referred to in section 118(1)(d) if that land is owned by the trustees on the settlement date. As soon as is reasonably practicable after the settlement date, a person authorised by the chief executive of LINZ must make a written request to the Registrar-General— a to record on the record of title for the land that the land is subject to section 120 of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 ; and b to remove from the record of title for the land the notation that the land is subject to section 11 of the Crown Minerals Act 1991. The Registrar-General must comply with a request received under subsection (2) . 124 Purpose and scope of arrangement for payments The purpose of sections 125 to 129 is to provide that the rights to vested minerals include the payment by the Crown, in relation to the vested minerals, of— a the representative amount; or b if section 129(2) applies, the actual amount. Payments made under subsection (1) must be made to the trustees. The representative amount or the actual amount payable is based on the amount of royalties paid to the Crown in the preceding year or years for which an application is made under section 130 in respect of the vested minerals. Payment of the representative amount or the actual amount, as appropriate, discharges the obligations of the Crown under this subpart in respect of any royalties paid to the Crown in respect of the vested minerals. 125 Obligation to pay representative or actual amount The chief executive, on receiving an application under section 130 , must pay the representative amount or the actual amount, as appropriate, in respect of vested minerals to the trustees. Subsection (1) applies even if the trustees have sold all or any of the relevant land or vested minerals, and the chief executive is not required to transfer payments to, or otherwise deal with, any new owner of the vested minerals. The requirement to pay the representative amount or the actual amount applies— a only if the Crown has been paid royalties in respect of the vested minerals in the year or years preceding the year in which an application is made under section 130 ; and b only in respect of a period of not more than 8 years after the date on which those royalties were received by the Crown. This section is subject to section 128 (shared ownership of land), section 130 (application for payment of representative amount), and section 132 (other conditions applying to payments). 126 Calculation of representative amount The representative amount payable under section 125 is calculated using the following formula: $r × (a ÷ pa) where— a is the area of relevant land within or overlapping the permit area pa is the total permit area of a privilege that is within or overlaps the relevant land $r is the total amount of royalties paid to the Crown in respect of the vested minerals, for the years applied for under section 130 , in respect of a privilege whose permit area is within or overlaps the relevant land. If— a is 4 sq kms; and pa is 20 sq kms; and $r is $1,500; then $1,500 × (4 ÷ 20) = $300. 127 Calculation of representative amount if more than 1 permit area If more than 1 permit area is within or overlaps the relevant land,— a the representative amounts must be separately calculated for each permit area in accordance with section 126 ; and b the total representative amount payable to the trustees in respect of the vested minerals for the permit areas is the sum of the separate amounts calculated under paragraph (a) . 128 Calculation of representative amount if relevant land held in shares If the relevant land is held in shares, the representative amount payable to the trustees in respect of the vested minerals is calculated using the following formula: $r × (a ÷ pa) × % where— a, pa, and $r have the meanings given to those terms in section 126 % is the percentage of the vested minerals owned in each share at the time the relevant land is vested in or transferred to the trustees. If— a is 4 sq kms; and pa is 20 sq kms; and $r is $1,500; and the vested minerals are owned in 20% shares; then $1,500 × (4 ÷ 20) × 20% = $60. 129 When actual amount may be paid When an application is received under section 130 , the Minister must determine whether the information is sufficient to identify the actual amount paid to the Crown as royalties in respect of vested minerals in the year or years applied for. If the Minister is satisfied that there is sufficient information to determine the actual amount referred to in subsection (1) , the Minister must pay to the trustees the actual amount to which the application relates in respect of those vested minerals instead of the representative amount that would otherwise be payable. If there is not sufficient information to enable the Minister to make a determination under subsection (1) , the chief executive must determine the representative amount payable in accordance with this subpart. If the relevant land is owned in shares, any payment of the actual amount in respect of the vested minerals must be made in the same proportion as the proportion of the shares held in the relevant land at the time the land is vested in or transferred to the trustees. 130 Application requirements The trustees (but no other person or body) may apply for payment of the representative amount. Applications must be made— a in writing to the chief executive; and b not more than once a year; and c not later than 31 March in respect of the preceding year or years applied for. Example relating to paragraph (c) The trustees may apply— by 31 March 2023 for a payment relating to the year 2022: by 31 March 2028 for a payment relating to the years 2022 to 2027. An application must not relate to any year earlier than 8 years before the date of the application. An application must contain the information necessary to establish— a that the relevant land is or was owned by the trustees (for example, a copy of the record of title for the land); and b the date on which the vested minerals in the relevant land became the property of the trustees; and c the shares (if any) in which the land is held; and d the year or years to which the application relates; and e the details of the trustees for the purpose of enabling payment to be made. No payment may be made unless an application is made under this section. The chief executive may request further information from the trustees— a to establish the information required under subsection (4) : b to enable the Minister to determine whether the actual amount or the representative amount is to be paid. 131 Advice to be given to trustees The chief executive must— a consider the application, including whether the information is sufficient to enable the Minister to determine the actual amount under section 129 ; and b advise the trustees in writing of the amount that the trustees are to be paid. 132 Other conditions applying to payments Payment of the representative amount or actual amount, as the case requires,— a must be made as soon as is reasonably practicable after 31 March in each year; but b must not be made more than once a year. For the first year of payment of the representative amount or actual amount, the payment must be calculated— a from the date on which the vested minerals in the relevant land became the property of the trustees (the vesting date ); and b in proportion to the number of days that have elapsed in that year on and from the vesting date. Interest is not payable on the amounts paid under this subpart, irrespective of the period to which an amount relates. 133 Confidentiality of information disclosed or received Any information disclosed to the trustees by the Crown under this subpart is a disclosure permitted under section 90A of the Crown Minerals Act 1991. Information about the royalties paid to the Crown in respect of the vested minerals may be disclosed to the trustees in fulfilment of the obligations of the Crown under this subpart. Information disclosed under subsection (2) is confidential to the trustees, subject to any legal obligations that the trustees may have to disclose the information, such as any statutory reporting requirements. 134 Amendments to Crown Minerals Act 1991 This section amends the Crown Minerals Act 1991. After section 25(6)(b), insert: c section 119 of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 . After section 32(7)(b) 32(7)(c) , insert: c d the trustees referred to in section 118(1) of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 , subject to section 119 of that Act. Replace section 49A(3) with: 3 The Acts are— a the Ngāti Pāoa Claims Settlement Act 2025 ; and b the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 . In Schedule 6, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: The land described in section 118(1) of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Act 2025 . 1 Cultural redress properties The following table is medium in size and has 3 columns. Column 1 is headed Name of property, column 2 is headed Description, and column 3 is headed Interests. Name of property Description Interests Kahumaro whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 55.6060 hectares, more or less, being Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 SO 52800. All Gazette notice H509919. Miro Street property South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 0.1513 hectares, more or less, being Section 169 Block LIII Town of Te Aroha. All Gazette 1963, p 414. Te Ruinga whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 24.6960 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 52060. All Gazette notice H426305. Subject to the right of way easement in gross referred to in section 25(5) . Subject to an unregistered memorandum of agreement for a right to convey water (dated 23 October 1991). Waihou property South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 0.7127 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 527362. Part Gazette 1879, p 913. Waiorongomai property South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 3.0000 hectares, more or less, being Section 7 SO 512808. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. Waterford Road property South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District 0.0706 hectares, more or less, being Section 3 SO 59335. Part Gazette 1984, p 3102. 0.0478 hectares, more or less, being Sections 5 and 6 SO 59335. Part Gazette notice B104924. Windridge property South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District 13.3076 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 529833. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. The following table is medium in size and has 3 columns. Column 1 is headed Name of property, column 2 is headed Description, and column 3 is headed Interests. Name of property Description Interests Omahu whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 86.1000 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 529392. Part record of title SA43A/929 for the fee simple estate. Subject to being a recreation reserve, as referred to in section 31(3) . Subject to the easement in gross for a right of way and rights to convey and drain water referred to in section 31(6) . Subject to an unregistered licence to occupy in favour of I Mayall dated 11 October 2010 . Te Awe whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 32.5000 hectares, more or less, being Section 2 SO 529392. All record of title SA25C/819 for the fee simple estate and balance Gazette 1927, p 2909. Subject to being a local purpose (water conservation) reserve, as referred to in section 32(4) . Subject to the easement in gross for a right of way and rights to convey and drain water referred to in section 32(7) . Te Mokena Hou whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 2.4180 hectares, more or less, being Section 147 Block IX Aroha Survey District. All Gazette notice S308051. 44.9049 hectares, more or less, being Section 143 Block IX Aroha Survey District. All Gazette 1927, p 2930. 6.9128 hectares, more or less, being Section 4 Block XLIX Town of Te Aroha and Section 141 Block IX Aroha Survey District. All Gazette notice S92730. Subject to being a scenic reserve, as referred to in section 33(3) . Tumutumu whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 18.6155 hectares, more or less, being Part Section 15 Block IX Aroha Survey District. All record of title 561059 for the fee simple estate. 16.7945 hectares, more or less, being Section 116 Block IX Aroha Survey District. All record of title 551945 for the fee simple estate. Subject to being a recreation reserve, as referred to in section 36(3) . Subject to the easement in gross for a right of way and rights to convey and drain water referred to in section 36(6) (affects record of title 561059). Wairakau whenua South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 2.8500 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 529834. Part Gazette notice H308154. Subject to being a scenic reserve, as referred to in section 37(3) . Subject to an unregistered concession (easement) with concession number BP-27807-OTH to Van Marrewijk Farms Limited. Subject to an unregistered concession (grazing licence) with concession number BP-27806-GRA to Van Marrewijk Farms Limited. The following table is medium in size and has 3 columns. Column 1 is headed Name of property, column 2 is headed Description, and column 3 is headed Interests. Name of property Description Interests Paewai South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District 2.5590 hectares, more or less, being Section 8 SO 511886. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. Subject to the conservation covenant referred to in section 38(3) . Pukewhakataratara South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District and Matamata-Piako District 19.3700 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 591071. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. Subject to the conservation covenant referred to in section 39(3)(a) . Subject to the right of way easement in gross referred to in section 39(3)(b) . Takaihuehue South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District 2.0130 hectares, more or less, being Section 7 SO 511886. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. Subject to the conservation covenant referred to in section 40(3) . Wahine Rock property South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District and Matamata-Piako District 7.6820 hectares, more or less, being Section 2 SO 511886. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. Subject to the conservation covenant referred to in section 41(3) . The following table is small in size and has 3 columns. Column 1 is headed Name of property, column 2 is headed Description, and column 3 is headed Interests. Name of property Description Interests Ngā Tukituki a Hikawera South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District and Matamata-Piako District 8.6190 hectares, more or less, being Section 1 SO 511886. Part Gazette 1975, p 2328. Subject to the conservation covenant referred to in section 42(4) . Tangitū South Auckland Land District—Western Bay of Plenty District and Matamata-Piako District 7.5410 hectares, more or less, being Section 3 SO 511886. Part Gazette 1975 p 2328. Subject to the conservation covenant referred to in section 43(4)(a) . Subject to the right of way easement in gross referred to in section 43(4)(b) . 2 Te Aroha Domain land The following table is small in size and has 2 columns. Column 1 is headed Name of land and column 2 is headed Description. Name of land Description Te Aroha Domain land South Auckland Land District—Matamata-Piako District 8.0937 hectares, more or less, being Section 16 Block IX Aroha Survey District. All record of title 550617 for the fee simple estate. 3 Overlay area The following table is small in size and has 2 columns. Column 1 is headed Overlay area and column 2 is headed Location. Overlay area Location Part Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park The area coloured yellow on OTS-100-422 4 Statutory areas The following table is small in size and has 2 columns. Column 1 is headed Statutory area and column 2 is headed Location. Statutory area Location Part Maurihoro Scenic Reserve As shown on OTS-100-423 Wairakau Scenic Reserve As shown on OTS-100-421

Hansard

April 22, 2026

Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill — Second Reading · Full day report

Second Reading Hon PAUL GOLDSMITH (Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations) (09:48): I move, That the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill be now read a second time. Tihei mauri ora. Ki te mana whenua o tēnei rohe, Te Āti Awa, tēnā koutou. E ngā rau rangatira o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, tēnā koutou. Nei rā te mihi hoki ki ngā wāhi o tō koutou rohe, ko Te Aroha, e mihi ana. Piki mai, kake mai ki Te Upoko-o-te-ika. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. [The breath of life. To the territorial authority of this region, Te Āti Awa, greetings to you. To the many leaders of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, greetings. I hereby acknowledge the significant sites of your region, Te Aroha, greetings. Welcome, welcome to Wellington. Greetings and thanks to you all.] It is my pleasure to stand and speak here in the House today on the second reading of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill. I want to acknowledge Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu—a small representation here today for the second reading debate—nearing the end of their settlement journey after beginning the negotiations with the Crown 15 years ago, in 2011. A lot has happened since then. Some of the claims that will be settle…
Read full Hansard debate
Second Reading Hon PAUL GOLDSMITH (Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations) (09:48): I move, That the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill be now read a second time. Tihei mauri ora. Ki te mana whenua o tēnei rohe, Te Āti Awa, tēnā koutou. E ngā rau rangatira o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, tēnā koutou. Nei rā te mihi hoki ki ngā wāhi o tō koutou rohe, ko Te Aroha, e mihi ana. Piki mai, kake mai ki Te Upoko-o-te-ika. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. [The breath of life. To the territorial authority of this region, Te Āti Awa, greetings to you. To the many leaders of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, greetings. I hereby acknowledge the significant sites of your region, Te Aroha, greetings. Welcome, welcome to Wellington. Greetings and thanks to you all.] It is my pleasure to stand and speak here in the House today on the second reading of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill. I want to acknowledge Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu—a small representation here today for the second reading debate—nearing the end of their settlement journey after beginning the negotiations with the Crown 15 years ago, in 2011. A lot has happened since then. Some of the claims that will be settled by this bill were registered with the Waitangi Tribunal in 1987—a golden year it was. The Māori Affairs Committee has considered the bill from November last year to March this year. There was a great deal of interest in the bill—it received more than 300 submissions, which is quite a large number for a Treaty settlement bill. Hearings were held here, in Parliament, but also in Te Aroha. I understand discussions were expansive and robust. I’d like to acknowledge the contribution of the submitters and the grace demonstrated by Ngāti Tumutumu Trust during these discussions. The Māori Affairs Committee notes the impact of the unusually long delay between Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu’s ratification of the deed in 2017 and its signing in 2025. That was due, in part, to litigation about overlapping interests in the Hauraki area and subsequent processes to address the concerns of overlapping iwi. It has been, very much, a priority, for me, as Treaty negotiations Minister, to try and unravel that process and bring a conclusion to it. So while Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu addressed overlapping issues relatively quickly, our initial plan was to have a third reading of all 10 Hauraki iwi bills together; that contributed to the delay so we’re progressing Hauraki bills as they are ready, now. The effect, however, was that there were long periods when the trust had very little to report to the claimant community, leading to some dissatisfaction, as the committee notes, on considering how the impact of the delays can be mitigated, particularly in relation to requirements for trustee elections. I just want to thank the committee for the review of the bill and their efforts to give their many submissions their due time and consideration. I’m satisfied with the committee’s recommendations, which included an amendment to clause 31 of the bill, sought by the Waikato Regional Council, and agreed to by Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to enable it, to discharge its flood protection responsibilities. Aside from this, there were only minor amendments to resolve technical issues and to correct reference to Te Aroha maunga in the historical account. This redress is reflective of a robust negotiation and many compromises made along the way. And I just want to thank the negotiators and the trustees for what they have achieved and secured for their people. We will obviously have a fuller debate and discussion at the third and final reading, which is set down for next month in association with Ngāti Tara Tokanui and the Ngāti Hei Claims Settlement Bill, which will be a very, very special occasion for the Hauraki group. I commend this settlement bill to the House. Nō reira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Hon WILLIE JACKSON (Labour) (09:53): Kia ora. Thank you, Madam Speaker. I just want to congratulate the Māori Affairs Committee on the mahi done on this over the last few months, its chairman, David MacLeod, who’s done a good job, and also congratulate the Minister, who needs some congratulations on this because I did wake up yesterday morning and listen to Radio New Zealand and a vote of no confidence was put to the Minister—not from this trust, but from Ruapani—but this is what Ministers have to go through. All Treaty Ministers have a very, very tough road to traverse with Treaty settlements—always they will face division and different views. And this Minister is not exempted, nor was Andrew Little, nor were previous Ministers who constantly have to work with hapū within the different iwi—Ngāpuhi being the biggest, probably, problem that any Government will have to deal with. I just want to congratulate the Minister on getting to this position and mihi to our little ope who’s come here i tēnei wā [at this time]. Ngā mihi ki a koutou e te whānau, i tae mai nei i tēnei wā, i whakarangatira i te kaupapa. E mōhio au he nui te mahi i ngā tau kua pahure, engari kei konei ināianei ki te whakanui i tēnei kaupapa, he mihi nui ki a koutou i tēnei wā. [Many greetings to you, the family, who have arrived here at this time, who have honoured the legacy. I am aware of the significant work over the years, but we’re here now to celebrate this legacy; many congratulations to you at this time.] When you look at this type of kaupapa, it’s interesting to look at some of the kōrero that comes out and some of the aspirations that the groups talk about. Despite the settlement process not being fair, in terms of pūtea, in terms of resourcing and funding, still our rōpū come together and come out with great sentiments. It’s appropriate that I read some of those aspirations. The Ngā Tumutumu Trust “he taonga, he haerenga, he ara whakamua” [“a treasure, a journey, a path forward”] kōrero talks about a future that includes all of us; a future that reflects the voices, hopes and realities of our whānau; a future that acknowledges our history of landlessness, the forced urbanisation of our people, and the impacts of colonisation that took many of us away from our home and away from each other. During the settlement processes, this is always one of the most relevant areas that hapū and iwi talk about. They talk about, from the respective tribe, being proudly from Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. They talk about being from that tribe, but never actually being brought up within the tribe, never been brought up within the rohe. When they talk about a settlement, they have to reflect on their reality, and, in many times, their reality, as I’ve said, is an urban reality—brought up in the city. When they talk about a future that acknowledges a history of landlessness and forced urbanisation of their people and the impacts of colonisation that took them away from home, those are real realities for Māori who go through this Treaty settlement process. Whilst some New Zealanders aren’t able to grasp what Māori are talking about, they only have to read these types of statements to understand how Māori have to grapple with their reality of, say, living in Wellington or living in Auckland, and never having gone back to what we call their hau kāinga, but feeling their hau kāinga—feeling their hau kāinga. I always talked about it, for me, from a Ngāti Porou sense, when we used to go through the settlement process and we went through the processes in the 90s. One of the—and the Minister will know—a lot of the kōrero, at the time, was, well, you can’t talk about your iwi if you’re not in your iwi; if you’re not part of your iwi; if you’re living in Auckland, with some, sort, of flash lifestyle and you’re not participating in iwi events in Ruatōria and what not. The response to that, of course, is that most Māori don’t live in their rohe; most Māori can’t participate at hau kāinga level. One of the problems of the process, we always said, was some of those people at the hau kāinga were grabbing the positions and not acknowledging the pan-tribal aspect. And there’s been a revitalisation of the reo; there’s been a renaissance in terms of kaupapa Māori, and so these types of settlements go some way to recognising that. That’s why I like it when I hear that a future that acknowledges our history of landlessness, the forced urbanisation of our people, and the impact of colonisation must be acknowledged. Being Māori is not just defined by where you grew up, the colour of your skin, or how long you’ve been away from the whenua, from the land—you belong because you are all of us. That’s what Māori around the country have to feel. That’s what Māori in Porirua have to feel; Māori in Ōtara—Māori everywhere. The strategy has to be about how we bring our people together, how they have to all feel Māori, even though they might not have grown up as Māori, not growing up speaking Māori, not growing up in the area, but they know in their hearts that they are Māori, they whakapapa Māori. That’s why the line “being Māori” is not defined by where you grew up, the colour of your skin, or how long you’ve been away from the whenua; you belong because you are all of us. We are rebuilding our waka—they’re saying—we are gathering our paddlers, we are strengthening our direction, and one day, with enough of us paddling together, Ngāti Tumutumu will move beyond the negative impacts of our past and into the prosperous united future our tīpuna dreamed of. He hoe, he hīkoinga, he huarahi mō tātou katoa. [A paddle, a journey, a pathway for all of us.] I want to congratulate the trust on those type of aspirations, on realising the challenge in terms of what we have to do in terms of te ao Māori, in terms of rangatahi, in terms of realising that the Treaty settlement process, for all its flaws, still is an opportunity to rebuild, to reshape, and to actually take an opportunity in building iwi. That’s where I see this process as being a real opportunity. The redress, of course, is not huge: a settlement package including $5.5 million in financial and commercial redress; the return of 17 culturally significant sites; and additional measures designed to strengthen Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu’s cultural identity and economic base. The iwi will also benefit from redress provided through the Pare Hauraki Collective Redress deed, which addresses overlapping interests across Hauraki iwi. We all know that there’s been a bit of a renaissance in the Hauraki; they’re finding their way, and this will no doubt help in terms of ensuring a better future for them. The iwi have endured land confiscations, questionable Crown purchasing, and extensive mining operations that stripped them of resources and left them virtually landless. Of course, these types of actions devastate them and, in fact, set them so far back that you wonder if they could ever recover, but the negotiations and the relationship with the Crown, particularly in the last few years—and the Crown has been a Labour Government and a National Government—have been cordial. The signing of the deed of settlement represents a signing of some trust and investment in the future. It’s a step forward, without doubt, for the Hauraki iwi. The iwi’s inclusion in the broader Pare Hauraki collective settlement framework will also strengthen regional collaboration, which is really important in terms of the tribe’s future. So, we support this, obviously, and we mihi to everyone who’s been involved, and we look forward to a third reading, where we’re sure all the different whānau and groups will come down and tautoko and celebrate, because these are the types of things that we will celebrate. We’re looking forward to that day—the House celebrating—and having a great kōrero when the third reading approaches. Kia ora anō tātou katoa. STEVE ABEL (Green) (10:03): Kia ora koutou, everybody, and particularly Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in the gallery today; kia ora. Traveling south from Paeroa, this magnificent maunga rises out of the landscape. You can also come in from Morrinsville and head east, and Te Aroha maunga is a particularly striking geographical site. It is truly beautiful, the ancestral maunga of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. One can understand the deep sense of loss that it was for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to have this maunga and the magnificent geothermal resources that are part of it quietly stripped away and taken and disrespected, and to have them denied their access to the geothermal waters there, despite promises that access would be maintained. We got a really strong sense, as the Māori Affairs Committee travelling down there, of how important the recognition of that magnificent natural phenomenon that is the hot water pools there was for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. It was gifted by the iwi in 1878 on the condition that the Crown would allow ongoing rights of access to the springs, but by the early 20th century, Māori no longer had free access. In fact, there was a form of segregation that went on there. We saw the separate small block down the hill where Māori were expected to access the hot springs. It was such a glaring example of a segregationist approach by which Māori were treated in this place: denied access and denied the mana and respect that they deserved for a thing that Māori had utilised and was part of their story and their ancestral heritage for generations before the British ever arrived here. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu defended the Waikato from British invasion in 1863 in the Waikato wars. We know it’s Anzac Week; we’re approaching Anzac weekend. We should remember that Māori suffered the greatest losses in the New Zealand Wars, and in fact more Māori died in the New Zealand Wars than in both the First and the Second World Wars combined. More Māori died in the New Zealand Wars than served in the First World War, at a time when the population was about 60,000 in the 1860s. Some of the highest casualties occurred in the Waikato. These were New Zealanders defending New Zealand, and it is right that we have changed the legislation around Anzac Day, which acknowledges that those New Zealanders who were defending New Zealand from British invasion are now recognised as fully as any others who have served our nation. The consequences of those wars were a completely unjust confiscation, a huge confiscation; 290,000 acres of land in the Tauranga district was confiscated. Then, when part of it was returned, it was returned with individualised title. This is a pattern we see: that land was taken out of collective ownership and then turned into individualised ownership. This is a form of economic colonisation, which had a devastating effect on Māori traditional ownership and land relationships. The economic colonisation of New Zealand is something that we’re getting a greater handle on, understanding just how devastating that was for iwi Māori, and no less so for Waikato Māori. It’s notable, given this Government’s particular passion for mining right now, that one of the desecrations that occurred on Te Aroha maunga was a goldmine which created lasting toxic pollution, damaged the tapu land, and has caused ongoing distress to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. This legacy of boom-and-bust economic exploitation invariably leaves the toxic heritage that iwi Māori have to deal with, long after the miners have packed up, taken their profits, and disappeared. This is one of the examples of a Crown breach and a Crown failing in regard to this iwi settlement. By the end of the 20th century, less than 3 percent of the land in the Te Aroha block remained in Māori ownership, and my colleague Willie Jackson has spoken about the impact of the marginalisation and the loss of land, the loss of economy and self-determination that is a consequence of this colonisation. The Crown acknowledges the extent of its failure and its breaches of Te Tiriti o Waitangi in this settlement. It is but a tiny fragment of the harm and loss that was caused that has been recognised and made amends for by this bill today, but it is certainly the hope of this House and this Parliament, as we speak in unanimity on these bills, that it is a positive step in the journey for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, towards your self-determination as an iwi. I note that one of the changes we made in the select committee process was to the wording around recognising the centrality of the maunga in the settlement. In clause 8(1) the “Summary of historical account” has been amended to include “Maunga” following “the lands on and surrounding Te Aroha”. This change was made to replicate the wording from the historical account in the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu deed of settlement, which provides more prominence to the maunga than to the township of Te Aroha. It’s a very beautiful part of the country, and I believe for us to truly celebrate and enjoy the exquisite nation in which we live, we must make amends for the injustices against Māori. I cannot, as tangata Tiriti, as a descendant of the Europeans who colonised this land—I cannot—really, deeply enjoy the magnificence of Te Aroha mountain if I don’t have a sense that the original inhabitants and the original kaitiaki, caretakers of that maunga, have their mana and their tino rangatiratanga recognised and acknowledged and upheld. It is through justice for Māori that we have a sense of wellbeing for the whole nation. We have a sense of the cohesion and the unity of our nation, underpinned by a principle that there is justice for everybody. That is why it is so important that we fulfil our commitment to that founding agreement, Te Tiriti o Waitangi. That is why we support these settlements, as the Green Party, though we don’t accept the characterisation of them as full and final, because they are part of a relationship that lasts in perpetuity. The importance of that relationship between the Crown and iwi Māori is vital for the thriving of us as a whole country. We commend this bill to the House and we acknowledge your generosity, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in accepting this offering. Kia ora koutou. CAMERON LUXTON (ACT) (10:13): I rise to speak on behalf of the ACT Party in this Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu second reading, and tēnā koutou to the members who have made it here, and tēnā koe, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu who are listening. I live in the Bay of Plenty, and we have many maunga that we see. We can see all the way to Tarawera, we can see Pūwhenua, Mauao most famously, but also where we reside we can see Te Aroha—when you know how to recognise it. Te Aroha Maunga is being placed in an appropriate amount of prominence in this settlement legislation because of the deep connection that it has to all iwi of the Hauraki area, but also the connections it has over and represents metaphorically with the connections into the Bay of Plenty. The historic account recounts the connections that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu has across the Hauraki and Bay of Plenty, and a lot of the settlement is focused mostly in the Waikato side of the hills there. I have to say I was pleased to see some of the work that the Māori Affairs Committee—which I’m not on—has undertaken to make sure that important pieces of infrastructure are not burdens on the new landowners but also maintained in a way—this is the flood protection—that can give confidence to homeowners, landowners, and communities that this is a settlement for everybody; to make sure that, as members have spoken about in previous contributions, the harms of the past can be recognised, that harms in the future can be avoided, and that we can work on building this nation together. Thank you, Madam Speaker. JENNY MARCROFT (NZ First) (10:15): Thank you, Madam Speaker, I rise on behalf of New Zealand First in support of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill, now at its second reading. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, tēnā koutou katoa. Ka nui aku mihi maioha ki a koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. [Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, greetings to you all. Many kind regards to you, greetings and thanks to you all.]. I acknowledge a small rōpū here today to be part of the second reading as we progress this bill through to its final conclusion—hopefully not too far away—because it’s taken a mighty long time to get here to this point. This bill is obviously the result of 15 long years of negotiations between the Crown and Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, so it’s important that we are here today to come in for landing at the second reading. The Māori Affairs Committee, which is probably one of the most enjoyable committees to be on, because you learn so much about our history and our Māori history and those early years—that select committee does a great job of panel beating any piece of legislation that comes before them, and it’s certainly done a good job with a recommendation that all of the amendments that have been put through the select committee process be passed. In 2023, the census estimated around 510 members of the iwi—while small in number, obviously very mighty in mana; and 332 submissions came before the select committee. When you consider how many members of the iwi—510, with 332 submissions, and the Minister noted that there were robust and expansive discussions held through that select committee process. That process is really important, to enable people to give voice to their concerns, of which there were many. This iwi is one of the original iwi with ancient whakapapa in and around Tīkapa Moana and the Hauraki Gulf. They’ve also been recognised in the broader family of the Hauraki Gulf, the 12 iwi of Hauraki, including Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, part of the Pare Hauraki Collective in relation to collective redress for those shared interests in the Hauraki region. This bill speaks to those specific iwi matters. Much has been spoken about Te Aroha Maunga, and in legislation, words matter. They matter because they will be there for eternity. The committee noted that there was an omission in the historical account, around the reference of Te Aroha Maunga. The “Maunga” has been reinserted, to ensure that that is the correct place it should have been, so it matched up with the deed. That was a good amendment to make. There were some other amendments around the flood protection assets that are owned by the Waikato Regional Council. Clause 31 has been amended there, with some additional subclauses put in around the Omahu whenua, which would be vested in the trustees of the Ngāti Tumutumu Trust. The Waikato Regional Council owns and maintains several flood protection assets on and adjacent to the Omahu whenua, so those amendments were necessary to ensure that they can continue to do their work around access management and operational powers relating to that particular thing. Rāhiri Tumutumu support those amendments, so it is good that that has been amended at select committee. Also, there was some differing views that came through the submissions. “What is the correct name of the iwi?”; “Should it include ‘Rāhiri’; should it not include ‘Rāhiri’?” It’s really not for Parliament to make any determinations around that; those are iwi-specific matters. It is not for parliamentarians to tell people who they are. I want to make a short contribution, because I think it’s important that we move through to the third and final reading as soon as we can. The Ngāti Tumutumu Trust have made some statements about where they move to towards the third reading, and I’d just like to read from that. They’re beginning the important mahi of bringing their whānau together to prepare for the significant milestone, the third and final reading. That reading will be a momentous occasion for them and a chance for all the whānau to travel to Pōneke and stand together in their iwi’s journey as it reaches that historic point. On that note, I’d like to acknowledge all of those who’ve worked hard to bring this bill forward, the Māori Affairs Committee, the Minister, all of the members of the iwi, and all those who made an effort to make submissions at the select committee. Today, another step is taken as the settlement bill makes its way through the House. I commend it to the House. HANA-RAWHITI MAIPI-CLARKE (Te Pāti Māori—Hauraki-Waikato) (10:21): Tēnā rā koe e te Pīka, otirā tēnā rā tātou e te Whare. Tōia tapotu ki te moana Tainui Mā wai e tō? Māku e tō Uia te pou o tōku whare kia tū tangatanga He kapua whakairi nāku nā runga mai o Taupiri Ko taku kiri ka tōkia e te anu mātao E te iwi, whītiki, whītiki. Ngā tai e ngunguru nei, whakarewa, whakarongo mai rā. [Haul the Tainuiall the way to the sea Who will haul her? I will haul her Inquire of the columns of my house to stand at ease A suspended cloud of mine from above Mt Taupiri My skin is moistened by the cold To the people, come together, unite. The tides that murmur, rise, listen to me.] Kua ara pea ahau i te papa o te whenua, kua kite ahau i ngā whetū e tū takitahi ana. Ko Matariki te kairūri, ko Atutahi kei te taumata o Te Mangōroa. Kei te Whare, kei Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, nei rā ka mihi ki a koutou. Ko tēnei te reo owha o Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Whāwhākia te toro atu ki a koutou i tēnei o ā koutou kerēme kua tae mai ki roto i te Whare Pāremata i tēnei o ngā rangi. [Perhaps I arose from the land—I have seen the stars standing alone. Matariki is the one who surveys; Atutahi is positioned at the zenith of the Milky Way. To the House, to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, I hereby acknowledge you. This is the voice of Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Whāwhākia, extended in welcome to you in this particular claim of yours, you who have come into the House of Parliament today.] I’d like to acknowledge the time, energy, and resources spent by many in this settlement—15-plus years of this current phase of negotiations. As I’ve mentioned before in many other settlement readings, I can just imagine the many tears, sweat, and blood it has taken for Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu to get to this point. I want to acknowledge how hard the Treaty settlement processes can be. It is so exhausting that people die to get settlements across the line. As an uri of Waikato and of Tainui, our iwi has spent 30 years in the settlement processes, and we’ve seen the many stalwarts such as Tā Te Kotahi Mahuta and the many different rūruhi tūpuna who have put their mahi on the line. I’d just like to acknowledge your tūpuna, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. While this phase has been long, I want to reiterate the point my colleague Teanau Tuiono shared in the first reading of this bill—that Ngāti Rāhiri brought to this Parliament the issue of the land alienation in 1877 under the Native Affairs Act. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, I want to acknowledge your negotiations team; I acknowledge the challenge of keeping your whānau up to date when the processes were delayed and as you worked through to resolve overlapping interests with your wider Hauraki whānau. Ko Moehau te taurapa, ko Te Aroha te tauihu. [Moehau is the carved stern post, Te Aroha is the prow figure.] Historical grievances covered in this claim include confiscation of land, the Crown’s purchasing tactics, the operation and impacts of native land laws, and the impact of mining. I want to particularly acknowledge the raupatu you too suffered when coming to our assistance in our time of need during Ngā Pakanga. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu sent men to fight Crown forces in Waikato in 1863. Like us, you were branded as rebels and penalised with the confiscation of your lands. The settlement provisions within this Treaty settlement include a formal apology, cultural redress, and financial redress: a formal apology from the Crown to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu for promoting laws and policies that lead to loss of land, damaged the sacred taonga Te Aroha maunga, and undermined your wellbeing and ability to pass on mātauranga Māori to your mokopuna; cultural redress that includes 18 sites of cultural significance; financial and commercial redress of $5.5 million. It also acknowledges the recognition of the broader Pare Hauraki Collective in relation to the Collective Redress Deed. In particular, I want to acknowledge the restoration of your maunga tapu, ko tōna ingoa tūturu ko Puke-kākāriki-kai-tahi [whose true name is Puke-kākāriki-kai-tahi]. I acknowledge its peaks, Te Aroha-ki-uta, Te Aroha-ki-tai. The mining, proclamation of a gold field in Te Aroha in 1880, and Crown actions have deprived your iwi of control of your own resources. Hei whakakapinga [in conclusion], in this Treaty settlement process, your whakaaro is to create new taonga that reflect the darkness of your negotiation journey, the struggles faced, and the determination required to emerge into the light. As you have stated: “We are rebuilding our waka; we are gathering our paddlers; we are strengthening our direction one hoeat a time; and one day, with enough of us paddling together, Ngāti Tumutumu will move beyond the negative impacts of our past and into the prosperous united future our tūpuna dreamed of. He hoe, he hikoinga, he huarahi mō tātou katoa.” Tēnā rā tātou i te Whare. Te Pāti Māori supports this bill. TEANAU TUIONO (Green) (10:25):Tēnā koe, Madam Speaker, otirā tēnā tātou e te Whare. Tuatahi me mihi atu au ki a koutou, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Tēnei ngā Kākāriki e mihi ana ki ō koutou nei māia, ki ō koutou nei mana, me te roa anō hoki o tēnei o ngā hīkoi. Kei te whakaaro ake i tau tuatahi i tae mai tēnā ki tēnei o ngā Whare i te tau 1870. Tae noa ki tērā wā, tae noa ki tēnei wā kei konei tonu koutou, nō reira e mihi ana, e mihi ana, e mihi ana. E mihi ana ki a rātou mā kua mene atu ki tua o te ārai, rātou anō i whetūrangihia, ngā kaumātua i whakapau kaha, i whakapau werawera kia rite ai tēnei o ngā whakatau kerēme kia puta ai ki te ao mārama tēnei o ngā ture. Mō tēnei, ko mātou anō ngā Kākāriki e tautoko ana i tēnei pānuitanga tuarua. Ko te manako nui he iti ake ngā auheke kia tae ki tōna pānuitanga tuatoru. Tautoko au i ngā kōrero a tō mātou nei tangata, Steve Able. Ki a mātou, ngā Kākāriki, ehara te Tiriti i te kirimana, he kawenata kē te Tiriti o Waitangi. Ko tēnei mea te kirimana e tohu ana anei anō te wāriu o te tāra hei pūtea ki te pūkoro. Kāre mātou e whakaae ki tērā. Ko tēnei mea te Tiriti o Waitangi he kawenata e whakaora ana mai i te wā i tāmokohia e ngā mātua tīpuna ki Waitangi, huri noa i Te Ika-a-Māui, otirā tae noa ki Te Waipounamu, kia noho ō tātou nei iwi, ō tātou nei hapū ki runga i ō rātou nei mana motuhake. Ki te taha o te Pāremata, ki tōku nei whakaaro, ki a mātou ngā Kākāriki, me pēhea te tautoko i ngā ara kia ora ai te tino rangatiratanga mō ia hapū, mō ia iwi, mō ia whānau. Tērā te wāhanga anō ki a mātou, nō reira tēnei ka mihi atu ki a koutou. Me whakaaro nui tonu ai ki ngā hītori o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. I tae rātou ki roto i ngā pakanga o te raupatu ki Waikato, nō reira e tautoko i tēnei o ngā mihi a Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, tō koutou nei māia, tō rātou nei māia kia tae ki te āwhina i ō rātou nei whānau ki te whawhai ki ngā pū o Piritana Nui, ngā pū a te Pākehā. Ka kite anō i tērā, te māia o te iwi. Nā runga i tērā i raupatuhia te whenua, i raupatuhia tō rātou nei maunga, nō reira Te Aroha maunga, tēnei ka mihi atu, tēnei te mihi atu ki tō koutou nei ata. Kāre anō ahau kia tae ki te maunga, ki a Te Aroha maunga, heoi anō ka whai whakaaro kia tae atu. E ai ki ngā hītori, he maina koura te mahi ki roto i tērā. Ko ngā para i tukuna ki roto mai i tērā maina e pā ana ki te hapori o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Heoi anō ko te katoa o ngā rawa i ahu mai i ērā maina kāre i tae ki ngā pūkoro o te iwi, kei tangata kē atu. Nō reira ko tēnei ture, me whai wāhi me pēhea e whakatikatikahia ai. Nō reira me mihi ka tika ki te Komiti Whiriwhiri Take Māori, e mahi ana i ngā mahi ki roto i ngā tukanga a te Pāremata.Ko ētahi wāhanga i hiahia rātou kia paku panonihia ki roto i te ture, te tuatahi i kōrero tahi rātou me te kaunihera ā-rohe, me Waikato, me pēhea te tautoko i ngā āhuatanga o te waipuke, flood protection gates. He whakaaro pai anō tērā. He wāhanga anō tērā hoki kia noho pū te aronga o te maunga o Te Aroha ki roto i te ture i te mea, ki taku nei whakarongo ki ngā kōrero e huri haere ana i te Whare i te ata nei, kei reira anō te mana nō reira e tika ana kia noho te mana o te maunga, te pū o te maunga, ehara nō te Pāremata, tātou anō e whakarite ana i ngā ture, te maunga kei roto i tēnei o ngā ture.Nō reira e mihi ana ki te komiti whiri take mō tērā o ngā āhuatanga. Ko te mea i kite au ki roto i te katoa o ēnei momo ture i ahu mai i ngā whakatau kerēme, ko tētahi wāhanga anō mō ā tātou nei tamariki mokopuna, ko tēnei mea te hītori. He hītori anō tērā mō tātou katoa, ō tātou nei rangatahi, kia ākona e rātou ngā hītori kei raro i ngā rekereke i a rātou e hīkoi ana ki runga i te whenua. Nō reira tēnā koutou e te Whare. Tēnā koutou, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Tēnā tātou katoa. [Thank you, Madam Speaker; indeed, greetings to us all in the House. First, I should acknowledge you, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. We, the Greens, hereby acknowledge your courage, your power, and the length of this particular journey. I consider that the first year that this came to this House was in 1870. Right from that time and all the way to now, you are still here; therefore, I acknowledge, thank, and congratulate you. I acknowledge those who have gathered beyond the veil, those who have become star-like, the elders who expended their strength, that expended sweat to prepare this particular claim settlement, so that this particular legislation see the light of day. Regarding this, it is us, the Greens, that are in support of this second reading. Our great hope is that the difficulties are few as it reaches its third reading. I support the comments of our colleague, Steve Abel. To us, the Greens, the Treaty is not a contract; the Treaty of Waitangi is instead a covenant. This particular phenomenon—a contract—demonstrates that this is the dollar value for money in the pocket. We don’t agree with that. This phenomenon, the Treaty of Waitangi, is a covenant that was given life at the time of its signing by the forebears and ancestors in Waitangi, all around the North Island, and indeed all the way to the South Island, so that our iwi and our hapū could retain their own self-determination. With respect to Parliament, in my opinion, to us the Greens, the question is how we could support the pathways by which the sovereignty of each hapū, of each iwi and each family, can be realised. That is our role, and so I hereby acknowledge you. Due consideration must also be given to the histories of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. They were involved in the wars of confiscation in Waikato; therefore, I support the acknowledgements of Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke: of your courage, and for their courage to arrive there to provide assistance to their relatives to fight against the firearms of Great Britain, the firearms of the Pākehā. You see that—the courage of the people. It is due to that that their land was confiscated, and their mountain was confiscated; therefore, I acknowledge Te Aroha mountain—I hereby acknowledge you this morning. I have yet to make it to the mountain, to Mount Te Aroha, however, I intend to do so. According to the histories, the predominant activity there was goldmining. The waste expelled from within that affected the community of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. However, none of the assets that came from those mines made it into the pockets of the iwi; instead, other people have them. Therefore, this legislation should include how this may be corrected. Therefore, the Māori Affairs Committee should be acknowledged, those that conduct the activities within the processes of Parliament. Some of the sections that they wanted to be amended somewhat within the legislation: the first is consultation between them and the regional council, Waikato, on how to support the circumstances of flooding, i.e., flood protection gates. That is a worthy idea. Another section is the explicit inclusion of the mountain, Te Aroha, within the legislation, because, as I listened to the comments circulating around the House this morning, it included authority; therefore, it is appropriate that the power of the mountain, the provenance of the mountain, does not reside with Parliament—those of us that create legislation, that the mountain is included in this particular legislation. Therefore, I acknowledge the select committee of that sphere. The thing that I observed within this type of legislation born of claims settlements is a section for our children and grandchildren, i.e., history. That is history for all of us, our young people, so that they are taught the histories at the feet of those that walked the land. Therefore, greetings to House. Greetings to you, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Greetings to us all.] DAVID MacLEOD (National—New Plymouth) (10:31): Tēnā koe te Māngai. Te mihi tuatahi ki ngā manuhiri o Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, nau mai, haramai, tēnā koutou katoa. [Thank you, Mr Speaker. The first greeting is to our guests, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu; welcome, welcome, and greetings to you all.] Whenever I stand to talk in a reading of a Treaty settlement, I honestly treat it as an absolute honour. I say that because we have a participation in what is going to be scribed into history, and it’s an important part of history that I’m sure many iwi that have been through the process acknowledge. Clearly, the history that we talk to is not always a good history, and Treaty settlements are put in place to correct those wrongdoings. What I also like to do when I speak to Treaty settlements is to talk to viewers about who it is that we’re talking about. When we say iwi, not everybody’s familiar with where they’re from and that, and I think it’s important that they do. So Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu are of Te Aroha maunga, and I’ll talk to that name specifically, because that was one of the amendments we made within the bill from the Māori Affairs Committee. It is of the Hauraki Plains, obviously. They also have interests in the Kaimai range, out to Katikati and also to Te Puna, but also the Coromandel Peninsula. So hopefully that gives everybody a bit of a bearing of who this iwi is. Also, the name is interesting, and I’ve learnt a lot, as I do with every Treaty settlement that I go through. Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu has two specific names, Rāhiri and Tumutumu, and I’d like to just briefly talk to that for people’s understanding. Tumutumu: that name there actually comes from Ngāti Raukawa, a neighbouring or very close iwi itself, and it is said within the settlement—and people can read this here—it traces their origins to Te Ruinga, the son of Tumutumu from Ngāti Raukawa. Also Rāhiri itself: people may be familiar with Ngāti Rāhiri of the Far North, up in Ngāpuhi, and that is indeed the Rāhiri that we’re talking about here. I’m from Taranaki; there’s actually Ngāti Rāhiri in North Taranaki as well. It’s actually in the Tikorangi area, just north of Waitara. Once again, Rāhiri was a prolific traveller, obviously, and I understand that he travelled through Auckland, the Bay of Plenty, and also down to Ngāti Taranaki. So there are the connections of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu with regards to this Treaty settlement claim. The process itself was a good process, as it should be. It was an emotional process. We had the occasion as a committee to have a hearing up at Te Aroha, at the railway station building, which is a lovely building to hold the occasion, but we also had another hearing here in Wellington. As it is for all Treaty settlements that I’ve been involved with, submissions come with emotions—not just the emotions of the loss and the grievance of what has preceded what today is but also the challenges of the present-day situation. It wasn’t surprising to me, because I do see it quite often, that when you have a large grouping of people—when you talk about the membership of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, you’re talking about at least 510 members, according to the last census that was held. When you have a large grouping your members, to think that everybody’s singing from the same song sheet is probably a little bit of an impossibility, from my experience. So we did have some strong submissions about the process that was there. The select committee did propose two amendments; they’ve been spoken about by previous speakers. I should mention those, the first one being the name Te Aroha maunga, as I spoke of earlier. In the bill originally, it just spoke of Te Aroha, and, quite correctly, through consultation with the iwi, it was more fitting for it to be Te Aroha maunga. So that was corrected in consultation with iwi, and everybody is in agreement with that. The second amendment that has been proposed is the flood protection assets of the Waikato Regional Council. Clearly, these are assets that the public, including Māori, have contributed to. Flood protection assets are there for the protection of not just public but also private assets themselves, and I’m very pleased to see that the iwi acknowledged the importance of that and made sure that the Waikato Regional Council had the ability to manage those assets appropriately. So thank you to the iwi for that itself. There were other areas of interest that were brought up through the submission process. Even the name of the post-settlement governance entity: it is actually named Ngāti Tumutumu Trust—doesn’t actually have the Rāhiri in there. It was submitted to us whether that was right or wrong by some of the submitters, but the committee took what I believe is the absolutely appropriate approach: that’s not our business; that is your business to sort out. So we left that to them to talk of that, and I’m sure there have been many discussions subsequent. The relationship between the iwi and the maunga, I spoke about that: Te Aroha maunga. I’m from Taranaki; Taranaki Maunga is significant for me, and it doesn’t surprise me the significance that was placed in the submissions with regards to that there. There was an interesting one, and perhaps the iwi are not so aware of this, but there was a submission, or should I say a report given back, from the Regulations Review Committee. Now, I’ve been on the Māori Affairs Committee for a short time, but for the Treaty settlements I’ve been involved with, it’s not unusual that this kaupapa, this subject, comes up from the Regulations Review Committee. It’s specifically about a few clauses within this bill—89, 90, and 91—but it actually comes up with other settlements. These are the clauses that Te Tari Whakatau puts into the settlement in agreement with iwi. There is actually a common clause that’s been put in there, and it’s often been raised by the Regulations Review Committee. So, subsequent to this particular clause, the committee has chosen to actually open up a briefing with the Regulations Review Committee to set this straight once and for all. This is to do with secondary legislation and regulations and how it’s used in it. I don’t think there’s any worry about it, about what’s been put in place with previous settlements, or this one here itself. It’s a bit more of a parliamentary process that we have to run through to perhaps make sure we’ve got a clear understanding but put this to bed once and for all. With that, I’m very pleased to support this through its second reading, and I look forward to the committee of the whole House, which is occurring later on today as well. Kia ora tātou. GEORGIE DANSEY (Labour) (10:38): Kia ora, Madam Speaker. I’m honoured to rise to speak to the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill, second reading. I’d like to acknowledge the iwi and whānau who have come to the House today for this reading and really commend you on your mahi getting this bill to its second reading. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā tātou katoa. This bill records the acknowledgements and apology made to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu when the deed was signed, and gives effect to redress in the deed that requires legislation. It’s been a really long journey, as other speakers have spoken to—15 years of negotiations, and a long-awaited agreement. I hope that this bill acknowledges the past and looks to a stronger future. I know that the journey over the past 15 years speaks to resilience and hope for the iwi. I commend the show of unity and determination from Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu in working with the Crown to get to this point. This settlement serves as an apology from the Crown on the wrongs committed—namely, the confiscated 290,000 acres of land in the Tauranga district between 1865 and 1868; the retainment of the hot springs near Te Aroha by the Crown, and despite the Crown giving the use of the land back to the iwi by the early 20th century, I’m aware that Māori no longer had free access to the springs or input into the management of the site; the acquisition of the land in Te Aroha and Te Aroha maunga; and developments that continued into the 1960s by the Crown. This included the construction of a road to the summit of Te Aroha maunga and the granting of a mining licence to a private company. Consequences of these actions meant that the site became severely polluted and there was significant damage to the land and maunga. By the end of the 20th century, less than 3 percent of the land in the Te Aroha bloc remained in Māori ownership. Nothing can right the wrongs of the past, but I hope that this bill brings a degree of closure to the people and a hope for the future of the iwi, for your tamariki and your mokopuna. We know that the harm caused continued over successive generations. This speaks to many years of socio-economic deprivation and the disconnection from whānau and hapū that they had with their whenua. We know that many people of the whānau of the iwi ended up living outside of traditional lands, disconnected from their tikanga, tūrangawaewae, and whānau, which also came with a significant loss of te reo Māori and restricted ability for the whānau to pass mātauranga Māori on to their mokopuna. As I speak on this bill, I speak with two simultaneous feelings of immense privilege and pride, and also one of whakamā. You see, I grew up in the rohe of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. When I was eight, my whānau moved to the foot of the Kaimai Mamaku ranges. The property my parents purchased on Lockington Road backed onto the Kaimai Mamaku forest park. I feel privilege and pride because your rohe is so entrenched in my memories of childhood. My stepfather was a hunter, so I spent a lot of time in the ngahere, the bush, that backed off from our property. I spent many a day of my childhood swimming in the oceans near Waihi Beach and swimming in the swimming holes and the many awa that flow from the maunga. Thirty years later, my parents still live in your rohe, and I consider the shores of Bowentown Beach one of the few places that I truly feel at home. It is this beauty and the incredible memories that bring me to the privilege I have and hold dearly here, that I can contribute a very small amount to a place that I treasure so much by acknowledging the people who are truly tangata whenua of the rohe. But I also feel very whakamā. I feel whakamā, because when I went to Katikati Primary School and when I went to Katikati College, I didn’t know the name of the iwi. I didn’t know the wrongs of the past that were inflicted on you, and I didn’t know the whakapapa of the place where I grew up. In a place that brought me so much taonga and aroha, I grew up not knowing about its history. From those two places, there comes hope—hope that with a settlement and some redress, your tamariki and mokopuna will learn their tikanga, their whakapapa, and mātauranga Māori. By being able to reclaim sites of cultural importance, create opportunities for rangatahi, and rebuild your iwi presence, there is opportunity and there is hope. It brings me hope that the future of all the kids, whether they’re Māori, Pākehā, or other, will grow up understanding the commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi to know the iwi and hapū of that rohe that they are in and learn the importance of knowing that. It gives me hope that the next 8-year-old who moves to Katikati will understand whose land they are living on, that when they go to Katikati Primary and Katikati College, they will learn about the tikanga of the place, the whakapapa. The settlement is a significant milestone in Aotearoa’s journey in recognising Te Tiriti, but we must go further, and this bill demonstrates that for me strongly. In order to achieve full partnership with Māori, we must ensure that our tamariki and rangatahi have the knowledge and the history of Aotearoa New Zealand, that mātauranga Māori is embedded in our communities. Through the settlement, the Crown seeks to atone for these injustices and rebuild a relationship based on trust and honourable Treaty partnership. I hope this settlement, for your iwi, brings that. I hope this is an opportunity for you to bring your tikanga home, to build a flourishing whānau and hapū within your own whenua for all of the future generations to come. There is an opportunity for reconnection of your people to their whenua, tikanga, and te reo so that the mokopuna of Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu feel connected to their whenua, awa, tikanga, and te reo Māori. It is a great pleasure to be able to speak on this bill on the second reading. I wasn’t involved in the select committee process, but I know the land so well—walking up Te Aroha maunga. Other speakers have spoken about that beautiful, beautiful place, and I am so pleased that we’ve got to a position through a lot of, I know, pain and acceptance. I hope that this apology will speak deeply to your whānau about the future of hope and the opportunities that lay ahead of us. Madam Speaker, it is with great pleasure that I commend this bill to the House. TIM VAN DE MOLEN (National—Waikato) (10:47): Thank you, Madam Speaker. Like the speaker who has just resumed her seat, I have also had the good fortune of spending many years throughout my life in that area, and, indeed, now also have the even greater fortune of representing the most beautiful electorate in the country, being the Waikato electorate, which, on its eastern edge, includes this beautiful area of Te Aroha; the mountain, of course, that towers over the landscape from across the Waikato, really, but certainly in that local community; and, indeed, the fantastic people that make up that community as well. It’s a pleasure to be able to make a contribution here in the second reading of the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill. Now, we have heard from the chair of the Māori Affairs Committee and from the Minister. I want to acknowledge the work done in particular from the committee for their efforts. They came and visited Te Aroha. That wasn’t the hard part; it was getting them to leave again that was the hard part, because it’s such a beautiful community, as I’ve mentioned. It was great to have them come up and meet locally there as well and, indeed, to address some of the concerns raised by submitters and also to touch on one of the concerns in particular that I’ve had raised with me around the Te Aroha hospital land continuing to be available for the community, at a price that’s achievable for the community as well. We were able to have those fears allayed, which was fantastic. It’s particularly pleasing to see this process now reaching the end of what has been a challenging journey over a substantial period of time and to see now the Crown apology, the historical account, and, indeed, the financial redress, that helps to put a line in the sand and acknowledge that there have been challenges but there is opportunity as well. I think that’s always the focus whenever there is a difficult situation—that one works through to try and look at where the opportunity might be going forward. I’m sure we’ll traverse that more in the committee of the whole House stage, in the third reading stage. I do need to keep my contribution limited, so I will commend it to the House. Thank you. ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Maureen Pugh): This is a split call. I call Camilla Belich. CAMILLA BELICH (Labour) (10:50): Tēnā koutou katoa. Ko te mihi tuatahi ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Ko te mihi tuarua ki tō koutou maunga, Te Aroha; ki tō koutou awa, Waihau; ki tō koutou moana; ki tō koutou marae, Tumutumu. Ngā mihi nui ki ngā tāngata e noho ana i roto i tēnei Whare, me ngā tāngata e kite i tēnei kōrero i roto i te pouaka whakaata, ngā rorohiko, i roto i te Whare. [Greetings to you all. The first greeting is to Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. The second acknowledgement is to your mountain, Te Aroha; to your river, Waihau; to your ocean; and to your marae, Tumutumu. Many greetings to the people who now sit within this House, and those that are watching these speeches on the television, on computers, and in the House.] It is a very significant opportunity for any parliamentarian to be able to speak on a Treaty settlement bill. It’s not an opportunity that comes often, especially to those of us who don’t sit on the Māori Affairs Committee, but it’s always an opportunity to reflect on the history of our country and also of the different iwi and hapū who make up such an important part of New Zealand. I’ve had a good look at this bill that’s being put forward, and I commend anyone who is watching to look through, especially the historical account. This historical account has been prepared with care and is a very, very difficult thing to read in terms of everything that has happened to this particular group, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, over a period of time. I read through it all and I felt a deep sadness that your people had had to suffer through such immense attacks and loss. I know that being here will be bittersweet in terms of moving forward, but I’m also sure that your tīpuna are proud of you for the work that you’ve done, and I’m sure that your descendants will thank you for being able to take this historic step today. I wanted just to note—I do have a shorter call, and I don’t want to prolong this, because I know that you’ve waited long enough for this settlement—that one of the things that the Crown is actually acknowledging and apologising for is the Acts of this Parliament. I had a bit of a look at where the District Lands Act in 1867 and 1868 would have been done in this very place, in Wellington. The Parliament was moved, as I understand it, in 1865—so we’re standing, really, and apologising for actions that were taken by a predecessor of this House in this place. That is very significant, because the effect of the passage of that legislation, as this bill acknowledges, left you almost landless—“virtually landless” is what it says here. I want to acknowledge the mana of the land and also of your people, and what I know of Māori, which is not a lot, and what I know of the importance of land, which is a lot less than you know and many other people know. The simple affection that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu must have for the maunga Te Aroha in order to name it Te Aroha—one of the strongest emotions that you can express—and to have that maunga lost to you throughout such a period of time must have just been horrendous. It’s not an area where I’ve lived, but I wanted to say how striking it was to me to read through the historical account and everything that the Crown is acknowledging—and I want to also acknowledge the apology, which is really important; I probably don’t have time to read all of that, but I did note it down here that it is a substantive apology and it acknowledges substantive wrongs. One of the things I noticed when I was looking through the information is the thing that Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu did, not only in taking this forward, was also to have a taonga carved for this process by your kaiwhakairo Ben Whittaker. What mana of a people and an iwi to not only go through this substantive settlement process to move your people and this issue forward but to create a taonga to bring to Parliament to acknowledge this. I wanted to acknowledge everyone associated with this process and commend this bill to the House. RIMA NAKHLE (National—Takanini) (10:55): It’s lovely, actually, to be able to stand up and add my kōrero in the second reading of this very important settlement bill. I want to welcome those of you who are in the gallery today. I’m also looking forward to your small but mighty whānau coming in for the third reading, God willing. I want to acknowledge you up in the gallery, if you don’t mind, Madam Speaker. Jill Taylor, thank you very much for the aroha you showed us around Te Aroha mountain and for the care you all took—you as well, sir, and the chair of the trust, Daniel Braid, in explaining a lot of what came across as kind of nuances to us, but also sharing what your ancestors have been through that has led to this point. It’s something that was very memorable; we started by the railway there, and then we took our little tiki tour around. It’s something that’s tattooed in my memory; it was a very beautiful and special day, and you guys are a special iwi as well—like I said, small but mighty. I look forward to the third reading where we can celebrate, but of course always underpinned with that reflection on the sadness of the past but looking forward to the positivity that the future can bring. I commend this bill to the House. Hon JAN TINETTI (Labour) (10:57): Kia ora, Madam Speaker, and kia ora, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu—ngā mihi ki a kōrua. It’s lovely to see you here for this second reading of this claims settlement bill. It’s not often that I’ve had the opportunity to get up and speak on a claims settlement bill, but I specifically asked to do this. For a short time, I was on the Māori Affairs Committee—about 9 months—and in those 9 months, I was fortunate enough to be sitting through the process of this particular claims settlement bill, the Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu Claims Settlement Bill. I’d like to acknowledge the Minister—we’ve heard that here before; as the Hon Willie Jackson said, it’s not an easy position. It is a very difficult position to be the Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations, and you get a bit of raru coming your way. I have to say, to get through to this stage is something to be very proud of with any iwi and any iwi settlement. I’d also like to acknowledge the chair of the Māori Affairs Committee, David MacLeod. I think that he has a real heart for this work and for making certain that the mana of the iwi is upheld at all times. A lot has been traversed in this particular reading here today. We’ve heard about the changes that we made through the select committee process, but I particularly wanted to talk about the day that we spent over in Te Aroha—and I too want to acknowledge you, Jill, and the work that you and Nicola have done in the process. It’s been a long process, and we’re nearly there. It’s a good feeling that we’re nearly there. It was not that long before the end of last year that we went through to Te Aroha, and it’s not a long drive for me; I live in Tauranga. I’ve often seen the other side of the maunga, but seeing the Te Aroha side and going through and spending that day there, it had a real impact on me. I came away from that day thinking that every member of this House needs to have the experience of sitting through Treaty claims settlements, because it does hit you here. It impacted me so much that I came away thinking about the hurts and the wrongs that have happened to you and to other iwi over time, and how it’s important that we get this process right. It is important that we listen; it is important that we hear the raru. It is important that we sit there and be humble in that process. Sitting, as my colleague Rima Nakhle said on the other side, in that railway station and hearing the hurt from many different perspectives was something that, as I said, sits with you. It’s something that you can’t leave that situation without feeling that we’ve got to do better and we’ve got to do better, for now, to somehow heal that hurt, but, also, we’ve got to do better for future generations, as well, so that that hurt never has to be there again and we’re not sitting in that situation in another 150 years and having to go through the same process. I remember my former colleague, the Rt Hon Adrian Rurawhe, who gave a very gentle but firm—in the only way that Adrian can do—challenge to everybody in that room that day that this is not the end of the process. This is the beginning. It’s kind of like a transition, and it’s the beginning of a new part of the process. It’s time for new work to be done, to move forward and to repair the hurt. That sat with me that day, too, because I know Adrian has been through his own Treaty settlements and knew the division that can be caused in the process. But we’ve also got to remember that that division was caused hundreds of years ago through colonisation, and now it’s time to put that right and acknowledge that and the coming-together. That’s not going to be an easy process, but it’s one that I know that people are up for and that the iwi are up for, and they’ve already started a whole lot of work. That’s where I’ll go on to the next part of that day, is that we then got to see around—and many of the people that were there that day have already acknowledged the fact that we walked, with members of the iwi, through the Te Aroha domain and heard about the hurt that has happened over so many years. My colleague Steve Abel talked about the separatism that hurt; the resources that the iwi generously allowed people to have and to participate in the resources of the geothermal area that, as an iwi, back then, they generously let other people partake in, only to have it stolen from them and then to be given the small bath house back that they could use. I can remember asking the dumbest question of Jill that day, because we’d gone round the whole of the domain and we’d seen the pools and we’d seen all the beautiful areas, and then we came on to this—it’s really hard to describe it, to get that feeling; it’s kind of one of those moments you had to be there—but this little tiny shed and they opened the door and said, “This was where the Māori were allowed to bathe.” Also, with people that had skin conditions, they were put into the separate little area. I remember saying, “Oh, was it bigger than this?”—“No, no, no. This has actually been done up since then.” And I just could not believe it. It was one of those moments that I had that I went, oh, my goodness, this is just—what have we done as people, what have we done as a nation, that we did this and created so much hurt and how much this meant to the people, the tangata whenua, the mana whenua of the time and now, and the fact that it’s taken so long and that hurt has just amplified and amplified and amplified over time. That’s what it meant to me that day. I went away and I looked you up and I looked the iwi up on your website, and I started to see your own journey back to restoring who you are as a people and the work that you’ve done in restoring the mauri—or you’re starting to restore the mauri—of the maunga, and the work of restoring the people’s mana and how passionate you are about making this a better journey going forward. That’s what I took from that day, and I knew that we had to make sure that we got this settlement through in a way—as I’m sure every other member of the select committee did that particular day—so that it’s somehow restoring some of the hurt. It’s not going to go all the way, but it’s going to somehow restore some of that hurt and say—we don’t have a magic wand. We can’t go back to the past. We can’t restore and change direction that past has happened, but we can look forward and we can look forward to how we can make a difference now and how we can support you and your goals and your aspirations for what you want for now, for your people, for your tamariki and your mokopuna, and what you want for all of the future generations that you see in front of you, and how we can help be part of that journey, but not dictate the journey. That’s your journey from now, but we will be there to support and make sure that not only are we standing up for the wrongs that have happened in the past but ensuring that those wrongs don’t happen in the future. So I go back to where I started; I think every member of this House needs to have such an experience. It will change members of this House when they walk through and see first-hand. It’s different than being able to read about it in books. Actually walking through and seeing the hurt, but seeing the aspirations and knowing that we can make a difference in this House, is what every single member of this House needs to experience. With that, I absolutely, wholeheartedly commend this bill to the House. GREG FLEMING (National—Maungakiekie) (11:06): Nōku te maringanui ki te kōrero e pā ana ki tēnei pire, te pire whakatau mō te iwi, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. Ki a Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, tēnā koutou. Tēnā koutou, nau mai anō ki tēnei Whare. Ki ngā mema atu kua kōrero i tēnei ata, tēnā koutou i te āta whakaaro me te āta kōrero. Ko te āhua o tēnei momo kaupapa, te whakatau o tēnei pire, ko te tino āhua o tēnei Whare. Kua rangona e koutou tērā āhua, tērā atawhai i ngā kōrero katoa. Ākene pea i te nuinga o ngā kōrero. Ko te haepapa o tēnei Whare āianei ko te tuku atu i tēnei pire ki te Whare i tēnei ahiahi, ka āta whakaaro mā te taumata, ko te ingoa o tērā taumata ko te “select committees”, ā, kātahi ā tērā marama, ā tērā atu marama waihoki, ka haere mai, ka hoki mai ngā iwi katoa. Te mutunga kē mai o te harikoa mō tērā wheako, te whakanui o te whakatau, te mutunga o tēnei haerenga, ā, ko te tīmatanga o te anamata hou. Koirā te tūmanako, koirā te kitenga, koirā te tino tirohanga o tēnei momo kaupapa. Nā reira, anō, nōku te tino maringanui ki te tū i roto i tēnei Whare, ā, ka tuku atu i te pire nei ki te Whare.Tēnā koutou. [It is my great fortune to speak on this bill, the settlement bill for the people, Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu. To Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu, greetings to you. Greetings and welcome back to this House. To the other members who have spoken this morning, greetings to you who carefully considered and spoken. The nature of this type of initiative, the settlement of this bill, is the true nature of this House. You have felt that nature, that care within each speech—or, perhaps, the majority of speeches. The responsibility of this House now is to dispatch this bill to the House this afternoon, at which stage it will be carefully considered—the name of the stage is “select committees”—and then, next month, and the month after, also, all of the iwi will come; they will return. Such great joy for that experience, the celebration of the settlement, the conclusion of this journey, and the beginning of the new future. That is the hope, that is the vision, that is the true perspective of this type of initiative. Therefore, again, it is my great fortune to stand in this House, and to commend this bill to the House. Thank you all.] ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Greg O'Connor): The question is that the motion be agreed to. Motion agreed to. Bill read a second time.

Documents and supporting material