Parliament bill

Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill

Committee of whole house · Introduced by Hon Simon Watts · National Party

Last checked
July 15, 2026 15:53
Source captured
July 15, 2026 15:53
Source
View on Parliament.nz

What this bill does

According to the bill’s explanatory context, rising council rates are putting pressure on households, while councils may be spending beyond core local services. To refocus local government on cost-effective infrastructure, public services, and regulatory functions, with greater emphasis on value for money. The bill narrows local government’s statutory purpose and community outcomes to infrastructure, public services, and regulatory functions; requires councils to particularly consider specified core services in financial management; and gives central government powers to standardise some council reporting, conduct rules, standing orders, and activity groups.

AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.

Arguments raised in Parliament

AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.

Arguments for

The Government argues that removing the wellbeing focus will stop councils from spreading themselves across broad agendas, thereby preventing ratepayers from bearing the cost of lost fiscal focus.

Requiring councils to prioritise core services in financial management is claimed to direct spending into vital infrastructure while keeping rates affordable for families.

A public council-performance measurement framework will give ratepayers accessible comparative information, enabling them to hold their councils accountable.

Removing or modernising obsolete regulatory requirements will reduce councils’ compliance burden, speed delivery, and ultimately help lower rates.

Arguments against

Removing the obligation to consider tikanga Māori in appointing council-controlled-organisation directors will allow appointments of people without the necessary understanding of tikanga and mana whenua aspirations.

Prescribing a limited set of core services will leave councils unable to support areas such as economic development, climate mitigation, heritage, arts, and community funding, creating gaps in communities.

Nuance and qualifications

Labour accepts the bill’s performance reporting, consultant-spending disclosure, transparency, and compliance-relief measures, but argues they do not substitute for community aspirations and participation.

The Green Party speaker says the local-government sector accepts reform is needed, but argues this bill is flawed because central government is imposing change on councils rather than working with them.

Bill text

Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill

Version published November 24, 2025 00:00.

Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Act 2025 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. However, section 26(2), (3), and (5) comes into force on a single date set by Order in Council. If section 26(2), (3), and (5) has not come into force by 30 June 2030, it comes into force then. An Order in Council made under this section is secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). 3 Principal Act This Act amends the Local Government Act 2002. 4 Section 3 amended (Purpose) Replace section 3(d) with: d provides for local authorities to play a broad role in meeting the current and future needs of their communities for good-quality , cost-effective, and local — infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions. i infrastructure; and ii public services; and iii performance of regulatory functions. 5 Section 5 amended (Interpretation) In section 5(1), replace the definition of community outcomes with: community outcomes means the outcomes that a local …
Read full bill text
Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Act 2025 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. However, section 26(2), (3), and (5) comes into force on a single date set by Order in Council. If section 26(2), (3), and (5) has not come into force by 30 June 2030, it comes into force then. An Order in Council made under this section is secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements). 3 Principal Act This Act amends the Local Government Act 2002. 4 Section 3 amended (Purpose) Replace section 3(d) with: d provides for local authorities to play a broad role in meeting the current and future needs of their communities for good-quality , cost-effective, and local — infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions. i infrastructure; and ii public services; and iii performance of regulatory functions. 5 Section 5 amended (Interpretation) In section 5(1), replace the definition of community outcomes with: community outcomes means the outcomes that a local authority aims to achieve in meeting the current and future needs of communities for good-quality , cost-effective, and local— local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions a infrastructure; and b public services; and c performance of regulatory functions In section 5(1), insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: cost-effective , in relation to the delivery of infrastructure and public services, and the performance of regulatory functions, means ensuring that the public receives value for money by— a using resources effectively, economically, and without waste; and b taking into account the total costs and benefits of any decision or action In section 5(1), repeal the definition of public notice . In section 5(1), definition of significance , replace paragraph (a) with: a the district or region: In section 5(1), insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: waste management means solid waste collection and disposal 6 Section 10 replaced (Purpose of local government) Replace section 10 with: 10 Purpose of local government The purpose of local government is— a to enable democratic local decision-making and action by, and on behalf of, communities; and b to meet the current and future needs of communities for good-quality , cost-effective, and local— local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses; and i infrastructure; and ii public services; and iii performance of regulatory functions; and c to support local economic growth and development by fulfilling the purpose set out in paragraph (b) . 7 New section 11A inserted (Core services to be considered in performing role) After section 11, insert: 11A Core services to be considered in performing role 1 In performing its role, a local authority must have particular regard to the contribution that the following core services make to its communities: The following services are the core services of a local authority: a network infrastructure: b public transport services: c waste management and minimisation : d civil defence emergency management: e libraries, museums, reserves, and other community and recreational facilities. 2 In performing its role, a local authority must have particular regard to the contribution that the core services make to its communities. 3 In subsection (1)(d) , civil defence emergency management has the meaning given to it in section 4 of the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002. 3 In subsection (1) ,— civil defence emergency management has the meaning given to it in section 4 of the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 public transport service has the meaning given to it in section 5(1) of the Land Transport Management Act 2003 reserve has the meaning given to it in section 2(1) of the Reserves Act 1977 waste management and minimisation has the meaning given to it in section 5(1) of the Waste Minimisation Act 2008. 8 Section 14 amended (Principles relating to local authorities) Replace section 14(1)(c)(iii) with: iii the likely impact of any decision on the interests referred to in subparagraphs (i) and (ii): Replace section 14(1)(h)(i) with: i the social, economic, and cultural interests of people and communities; and Replace section 14(2) with: 2 If any of these principles are in conflict in any particular case, the local authority must resolve the conflict in accordance with the principle in subsection (1)(a)(i). 9 Section 17A amended (Delivery of services) Replace the heading to section 17A with Delivery of services by different entity . Repeal section 17A(1) to (4). In section 17A(5), replace infrastructure, services , or regulatory functions with local infrastructure , and local public services , or the performance of regulatory functions . 10 Section 39 amended (Governance principles) After section 39 (1) (e), insert: f a local authority should foster the free exchange of information between, and expression of opinions by expressions of opinion by, elected members; and g a local authority should foster the responsibility of its elected members to work collaboratively to set the local authority’s agenda, determine its policy, and make decisions on behalf of its communities to set and deliver the local authority’s policy agenda, determine its policies and budgets, and make decisions on behalf of its communities . 11 Section 40 amended (Local governance statements) In section 40(1)(e), after requirements and , insert standard . After section 40(1)(f), insert: fa how the local authority is acting in accordance with the governance principles set out in section 39(f) and (g) ; and In section 40(1)(g), after Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and , insert standard . 12 Section 42 amended (Chief executive) After section 42(2)(h), insert: i ensuring that members of the local authority have access to documents that— i the local authority holds; and ii are reasonably necessary to enable each member to effectively perform their duties as a member of the local authority. 13 Section 48O amended (Local board agreements) In section 48O(5)(a)(i), delete for each activity described in clause 2(2) of Schedule 10 . 14 Section 48Q amended (Application of Schedule 7 to local boards and their members) In section 48Q(2), delete 15 and . 15 Section 54 amended (Application of other provisions to community boards) In section 54(2), delete 15 and . 16 Section 57 amended (Appointment of directors) Repeal section 57(3). 17 Section 99 amended (Audit of information in annual report and summary) In section 99(1)(d), after Schedule 10 , insert (excluding clause 32B ) . 18 Section 101 amended (Financial management) Before section 101(1), insert: 1AAA A local authority must, when determining its approach to financial management, have particular regard to— a the purpose of local government stated in section 10 ; and b the core services of a local authority stated in section 11A . Replace section 101(3)(b) with: b the overall impact of any allocation of liability for revenue needs on the community current and future communities . 19 Section 118 amended (Certificate of compliance) In section 118, insert as subsection (2): 2 If a local authority holds out a person as having the authority to exercise the power of a chief executive under subsection (1) , then any certificate signed by that person under subsection (1) is conclusive proof for all purposes that the person has that authority. 20 Section 200 amended (Limitations applying to requirement for development contribution) Replace section 200(1)(c) with: c a third party has provided, or undertaken to provide, the same reserve, network infrastructure, or community infrastructure; or d a third party has provided, or undertaken to provide, funding for the same reserve, network infrastructure, or community infrastructure. After section 200(4), insert: 4A For the purposes of subsection (1)(d) , if the third party— a has stated that the funding provided by it , or any specific part of the funding, is to be used to pay for the project cost attributable to capital expenditure necessary to service growth over the long term , the whole or the specific part of the funding must be deducted from the portion of project costs being funded by development contributions; or b has not made a statement under paragraph (a) or (c) ,— i the funding must be divided pro rata between— A the project cost attributable to growth; and B the project cost attributable to other purposes; and ii any funding that is attributable to growth costs must be deducted from the portion of costs being funded by development contributions; or c has stated that none of the funding provided by it , or any specific part of the funding, is to be used to pay for the project cost attributable to purposes other than growth, the whole or the specific part of the funding capital expenditure necessary to service growth over the long term, none of the funding is to must be deducted from the portion of project costs being funded other than by development contributions . ; or d has not made a statement under paragraph (a) or (b) ,— i the funding must be divided on a pro rata basis between— A the project cost attributable to growth; and B the project cost attributable to purposes other than growth; and ii any funding that is attributable to growth costs must be deducted from the portion of project costs being funded by development contributions. In section 200(6), (8), and (10), replace (1)(c) with (1)(d) . 21 Section 259 amended (Regulations) Replace section 259(1)(dc) with: dc prescribing parameters or benchmarks for assessing whether a local authority is— i prudently managing its revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, investments, and general financial dealings; or ii performing specified activities or groups of activities in accordance with best practice: After section 259(1)(dd), insert: de prescribing the groups of activities that a local authority must include in its long-term plan, annual plan, and annual report: After section 259(1)(f), insert: fa prescribing processes, time frames, and other matters relating to a request for access to documents under clause 26A(2) of Schedule 7: After section 259(4), insert: 4A Regulations made under subsection (1)(de) may— a differentiate between particular local authorities or types or classes of local authority (for example, regional councils and territorial authorities); and b prescribe— i which activities must be included in a group of activities: ii which activities may be included in a group of activities: iii which activities must not be included in a group of activities. 4AB Regulations made under subsection (1)(de) must not include in a group of activities any activities relating to water services under the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025. 4B The Minister must, before recommending the making of regulations under subsection (1)(de) ,— aaa consult all relevant local authorities; and a consult any of the following persons that the Minister considers appropriate: i any local authority: ii any individual or organisation that the Minister considers representative of the local government sector as a whole: iii any other person; and b have particular regard to— i the purpose of local government stated in section 10 ; and ii the core services of a local authority stated in section 11A . 22 Section 261B amended (Secretary must make rules specifying performance measures) Replace the heading to section 261B with Secretary may make rules specifying performance measures . Replace section 261B(1) to (3) with: 1 The Secretary may make rules specifying performance measures in relation to activities or groups of activities provided by, or on behalf of, a local authority. 2 Before making a rule under subsection (1) , the Secretary must— a consider whether an existing performance measure, including a performance measure set by another relevant regulator, is suitable for the purpose; and b have regard to whether a proposed performance measure— i measures the level of service for a major aspect of the activity or group of activities; and ii addresses an aspect of the activity or group of activities that is of widespread interest in the communities to which a service in relation to the activity or group of activities is provided; and iii contributes to the effective and efficient management of the activity or group of activities. 3 Before making a rule, if the Minister advises the Secretary that the Minister considers it appropriate to consult any of the following persons, the Secretary must consult : — a any local authority: b any individual or organisation that the Minister considers representative of the local government sector as a whole: c any other person. a all relevant local authorities; and b any other persons or groups that the Secretary considers appropriate. 3A The Secretary may make minor and technical amendments to a rule without complying with the requirements set out in subsections (2) and (3) . 23 Sections repealed Repeal the sections specified in Schedule 1 . 24 Schedule 1AA amended In Schedule 1AA,— a insert the Part set out in Schedule 2 of this Act as the last Part; and b make all necessary consequential amendments. 25 Schedule 7 amended Replace the heading to clause 15 with Standard code of conduct . In Schedule 7, replace clause 15(1) with: 1 The Secretary may approve and issue a standard code of conduct for members of local authorities. 1A The Secretary may approve and issue an amended or a replacement standard code of conduct, but may not revoke it without replacement. 1B Before approving and issuing an amended or a replacement standard code of conduct, the Secretary must consult all local authorities. 1C Subclause (1B) applies only to any amended or replacement standard code of conduct that is approved and issued on or after 1 January 2027. In Schedule 7, clause 15(2): a replace The code of conduct with The standard code of conduct ; and b delete adopted by the local authority ; and c replace his or her with their . In Schedule 7, repeal clause 15(3), (5), and (6). In Schedule 7, replace clause 15(4) , delete “of that local authority”. with: 4 The following persons must comply with the standard code of conduct: a a member of a local authority: b a person appointed to a committee or subcommittee of a local authority who is not a member of that local authority. In Schedule 7, clause 15(7), after a breach of the , insert standard . In Schedule 7, after clause 15, insert: 15A Chief executive must provide explanation of amended or replacement standard code of conduct The chief executive must, as soon as practicable after any amended or replacement standard code of conduct is issued under clause 15(1A) , provide an explanation of the amended or replacement standard code of conduct to members in a meeting of the local authority that is open to the public. Replace the heading to clause 16 with Members to abide by standard standing orders . In Schedule 7, clause 16(1), replace standing orders adopted with standard standing orders approved and issued . In Schedule 7, clause 16(2), after ruling made under the , insert standard . In Schedule 7, clause 19(3)(c), replace of the local authority with approved and issued under clause 27 . In Schedule 7, replace clause 19(3)(c) with: c the standard standing orders approved and issued under clause 27. In Schedule 7, after clause 21(5)(c) (i) (ii) , insert: ia iii the standard code of conduct approved and issued under clause 15; and In Schedule 7, clause 24(4)(b), replace standing orders of the local authority with standard standing orders approved and issued under clause 27 . In Schedule 7, clause 25A(1)(a) and (2)(a), replace standing orders of the local authority with standard standing orders approved and issued under clause 27 . In Schedule 7, clause 25A(1)(b) and (2)(b), replace standing orders with standard standing orders . In Schedule 7, after clause 26, insert: Documents held by local authority 26A Member entitled to documents held by local authority 1 A member of a local authority is entitled to have access to documents held by the local authority that are reasonably necessary to enable the member to effectively perform their functions and duties , and to effectively exercise their powers, as a member of the local authority. 2 A member of a local authority may request access to the documents specified in subclause (1) from the chief executive of the local authority. 3 If the chief executive declines the request, the member may request access to the documents from the local authority’s governing body. 4 If the member requests access to the documents under subclause (3) , the governing body must make a final decision on the request. In Schedule 7, replace clause 27(1) and (2) with: 1 The Secretary may approve and issue a set of standard standing orders for the conduct of a local authority’s meetings and those of its meetings of local authorities and meetings of their committees. 2 The Secretary may approve and issue an amended or a replacement set of standard standing orders, but may not revoke them without replacement. 2A Before approving and issuing an amended or a replacement set of standard standing orders, the Secretary must consult all local authorities. 2B Subclause (2A) applies only to any amended or replacement set of standard standing orders that is approved and issued on or after 1 January 2027. In Schedule 7, repeal clause 27(3) and (5). In Schedule 7, clause 27(4), after suspend insert standard . In Schedule 7, clause 30A(6)(c)(iv), replace standing orders of any local authority or with standard standing orders approved and issued under clause 27 or the standing orders of any . In Schedule 7, clause 32B(4), replace the officer with an officer acting under subclause (1) . In Schedule 7, clause 34(4), replace 2 with 5 . In Schedule 7, replace clause 36B with: 36B Code Standard code of conduct Each member of each local board must comply with the standard code of conduct approved and issued under clause 15. In Schedule 7, after clause 39, insert: 40 Code Standard code of conduct Each member of each community board must comply with the standard code of conduct approved and issued under clause 15. 26 Schedule 10 amended In Schedule 10, replace clause 2(1)(c) with: c outline any significant negative effects that any activity within the group of activities may have on the local community: In Schedule 10, replace clause 2(2) and (3) with: 2 In addition to groups of activities prescribed in regulations made under section 259(1)(de) , a local authority may treat any other activities (except activities relating to providing water services under the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025) as a group 1 or more groups of activities for the purposes of this schedule. In Schedule 10, clause 4(a), replace described in clause 2(2) with prescribed in regulations made under section 259(1)(de) . In Schedule 10, clause 4(d), after reasons for the changes , insert (unless regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the preceding year that makes it impossible or impractical to include the statement, in which case the local authority must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so) . In Schedule 10, clause 4, insert as subclause (2): 2 If regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the preceding year that makes it impossible or impractical to specify the information referred to in subclause (1)(d) , the local authority does not need to specify the information but must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so. In Schedule 10, clause 17A(b), replace specified in clause 2(2) with prescribed in regulations made under section 259(1)(de) . In Schedule 10, clause 23(c), after achievement of those outcomes , insert (unless regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to provide the report, in which case the local authority must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so) . In Schedule 10, replace clause 23(d) with: d describe any identified effects that any activity within the group of activities has had on the community (unless regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to provide the description, in which case the local authority must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so) . In Schedule 10, clause 23, insert as subclause (2): 2 If regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to provide— a the report referred to in subclause (1)(c) , the local authority does not need to provide the report but must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so: b the description referred to in subclause (1)(d) , the local authority does not need to provide the description but must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so. In Schedule 10, clause 24(1), after the amount spent , insert (unless regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to include the statement, in which case the local authority must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so) . In Schedule 10, after clause 24(1), insert: 1A If regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to provide the statement referred to in subclause (1) , the local authority does not need to provide the statement but must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so. In Schedule 10, clause 25, insert as subclause (2): 2 However, a local authority does not need to comply with subclause (1) if If regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to include the statement , referred to in subclause (1) , the local authority does not need to provide the statement but must instead note why it is impossible or impractical to do so. In Schedule 10, clause 26(2)(b), after in accordance with clause 5(2) , insert (unless regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to provide the comparison, in which case the local authority must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so) . In Schedule 10, after clause 26(2), insert: 3 If regulations made under section 259(1)(de) have made a change to the groups of activities provided for in this Act in the year to which the annual report relates that makes it impossible or impractical to provide the comparison referred to in subclause (2)(b) , the local authority does not need to provide the comparison but must note why it is impossible or impractical to do so. In Schedule 10, after clause 32A, insert: 32B Expenditure on consultants and contractors An annual report must include a report on all operating and capital expenditure by the local authority on consultants and contractors— a in the financial year to which the report relates; and b in the immediately preceding financial year. 26A Principal Act Sections 26B and 26C amend the Local Government (Auckland Council) Act 2009. 26B Section 21 amended (Local board agreements) In section 21(5)(a)(i), delete for each activity described in clause 2(2) of Schedule 10 of that Act . 26C Section 29 amended (Application of Schedule 7 of Local Government Act 2002 to local boards and their members) In section 29(2), delete 15 and . 26D Principal Act Section 26E amends the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025. 26E Section 116 amended (Limits on power to require development contributions) Replace section 116(1)(c) with: c a third party has provided, or undertaken to provide, the same water services infrastructure; or d a third party has provided, or undertaken to provide, funding for the same water services infrastructure. After section 116(2), insert: 2A For the purposes of subsection (1)(d) , if the third party— a has stated that the funding, or any specific part of the funding, is to be used to pay for the project cost attributable to growth, the whole or the specific part of the funding must be deducted from the portion of project costs being funded by development contributions; or b has stated that the funding, or any specific part of the funding, is to be used to pay for the project cost attributable to purposes other than growth, the whole or the specific part of the funding must be deducted from the portion of project costs being funded other than by development contributions; or c has not made a statement under paragraph (a) or (b) ,— i the funding must be divided on a pro rata basis between— A the project cost attributable to growth; and B the project cost attributable to purposes other than growth; and ii any funding that is attributable to growth costs must be deducted from the portion of costs being funded by development contributions. 27 Principal Act Sections 28 to 30 amend the Local Government (Water Services Preliminary Arrangements) Act 2024. 28 Section 58 amended (Purposes of this Part) In section 58(b), replace sections 65 to 68 with sections 65 to 67 . 29 Section 68 repealed (Exemption from cost-effectiveness review) Repeal section 68. 30 Section 69 repealed (Repeal of section 68) Repeal section 69. 1 Sections repealed Section 32 Section 273 Section 274 Section 275 Section 276 Section 277 Section 278 Section 280 Section 283 Section 284 Section 285 Section 286 Section 287 Section 290 Section 291 Section 294 Section 295 Section 296 Section 297 Section 312 Section 314 2 New Part 10 inserted into Schedule 1AA 10 Provisions relating to Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Act 2025 59 Interpretation In this Part,— amendment Act means the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Act 2025 code of conduct means a code of conduct adopted by a local authority under clause 15 of Schedule 7 (as it was in force before the commencement date) commencement date means the commencement date of the majority of the amendment Act under section 2(1) of that Act standing orders means a set of standing orders adopted by a local authority under clause 27 of Schedule 7 (as it was in force before the commencement date). 60 Local governance statements 1 This clause applies to the requirement in section 40(2) for a local authority to comply with section 40(1) within 6 months after each triennial general election of members of the local authority. 2 A local authority need does not need to comply with section 40(1) (as amended by the amendment Act) within 6 months after the 2025 general election of members of the local authority but must instead comply with that section within 6 months after the commencement date . 3 However, a local authority must comply with section 40(1) (as amended by the amendment Act) within 6 months after the commencement date. 61 Code of conduct 1 This clause applies to the code of conduct most recently adopted by a local authority under clause 15 of Schedule 7 before the commencement date. 2 The code of conduct continues to have effect on and after the commencement date as if the amendment Act had not been enacted until the Secretary approves and issues a standard code of conduct under clause 15(1) of Schedule 7 (as amended by the amendment Act). 62 Standing orders 1 This clause applies to the set of standing orders most recently adopted by a local authority under clause 27 of Schedule 7 before the commencement date. 2 The standing orders continue to have effect on and after the commencement date as if the amendment Act had not been enacted until the Secretary approves and issues a set of standard standing orders under clause 27(1) of Schedule 7 (as amended by the amendment Act). 62A Terms of employment of chief executive 1 This clause applies to a chief executive who was appointed for a second term under clause 34(4) of Schedule 7 (as in force before the commencement date) less than 15 months before the commencement date. 2 The local authority may appoint the chief executive for a third term if the combined duration of the chief executive’s second and third terms does not exceed 5 years. 3 Despite the provisions of any other enactment or rule of law, the chief executive has no right or expectation of renewed employment at the end of the chief executive’s second term. 4 Clause 35 of Schedule 7 applies, with any necessary modifications, to any appointment of a chief executive for a third term under subclause (2) . 5 This clause is repealed on the second anniversary of the commencement date. 63 Expenditure on consultants and contractors The first report under clause 32B of Schedule 10 prepared after the commencement date— a must include a report on the relevant expenditure in the financial year ending 30 June 2027; but b need not include a report on that expenditure in the immediately preceding financial year.

Hansard

June 23, 2026

Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill — Second Reading · Full day report

Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill Second Reading Debate resumed from 23 April. LEMAUGA LYDIA SOSENE (Labour—Māngere) (12:33): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I rise to take a call on the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill. Labour strongly opposes this bill. Christopher Luxon and his Government are out of touch: cutting women’s pay, and it’s harder to see a doctor or nurses, as prices have been pushed up. He promised to make the cost of living better; it is not. This specific bill, in this context, shrinks the role of local government—a very important role throughout Aotearoa. It shrinks it to such things as pipes, roads, and rubbish, ignoring the wider needs of communities. The Minister’s made the decision to remove the four wellbeing provisions—very important provisions within local government—so that councils need to refocus, across the country, with regards to their core functions. The Minister advised that the changes would help restore discipline and transparency and would push councils to focus on things like roading, core infrastructure, water, and rubbish. By refocusing those, those cuts to council budgets still mean that Kiwis will go without…
Read full Hansard debate
Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill Second Reading Debate resumed from 23 April. LEMAUGA LYDIA SOSENE (Labour—Māngere) (12:33): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I rise to take a call on the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill. Labour strongly opposes this bill. Christopher Luxon and his Government are out of touch: cutting women’s pay, and it’s harder to see a doctor or nurses, as prices have been pushed up. He promised to make the cost of living better; it is not. This specific bill, in this context, shrinks the role of local government—a very important role throughout Aotearoa. It shrinks it to such things as pipes, roads, and rubbish, ignoring the wider needs of communities. The Minister’s made the decision to remove the four wellbeing provisions—very important provisions within local government—so that councils need to refocus, across the country, with regards to their core functions. The Minister advised that the changes would help restore discipline and transparency and would push councils to focus on things like roading, core infrastructure, water, and rubbish. By refocusing those, those cuts to council budgets still mean that Kiwis will go without important decision making for their local communities. The four wellbeings—social, economic, environmental, and cultural—were reintroduced by Labour in 2019, after being removed by the previous National Government in 2012. Councils are now required to prioritise core services when managing finances and setting rates. Labour would argue that the removal of the four wellbeings undermines councils’ ability to act on climate, equity, and cultural priorities. We would argue that this bill sets up central government control over local priority through these new regulatory powers. This is not a devolution; it’s a centralised control from Wellington, and it’s a fundamental shift, this bill, deleting those references of wellbeing from the purpose and the functions of local government—i.e., localism. The problem is that it changes the purpose of those protections that communities had, eroding the participation of those communities. It narrows the definitions of community outcomes, to infrastructure, to public services, and to regulatory functions only. The problem with that is that it does not prioritise for councils to take into account their community aspirations. What is important about community aspirations is that, in the structure, or under this amendment bill, it creates the reduction of community voices, diverse voices across the country for those specific councils, narrowing and focusing on the bricks and mortar stuff—which is important, we understand that, but community voice and participation is absolutely critical in the way that councils are run. It applies to the new amendment bill in terms of the refocus, as the Minister has stated in his contribution, but what it also does is that the frameworks—it dilutes the aspirations of communities across the board. It is really important that communities across Aotearoa, through the council frameworks, have the opportunity to provide input. Whilst the councils will have the specific role of determining those things for their local councils, when you don’t have a community voice, you will not get the participation; you will only put out publications, you will only advise of the costs and the acquisitions and the importance of why the council has to focus according to legislation. However, the important principles and values and wellbeings that were described before in the legislation—it is important for residents to understand the why: why council officials make decisions, the importance of information that comes out to the community, it is required to have the continued value input in every community. This Government promised to fix the cost of living. The Prime Minister promised to help Kiwis to get by, and we don’t see that in my local area. The Minister has advised that local government have drifted from their core responsibilities; they need to focus on the essentials and deliver to their community, and that, by refocusing councils, they will help deliver better value for money and help reduce the cost of living. The bill has other reforms: new financial performance measures for council, with a requirement for regular public reporting; mandatory disclosure of contractive consultant spending; stronger transparency and accountability requirements; and regulatory relief to reduce unnecessary compliance burdens. Look, we agree with those things; however, I come back to the point I made earlier: the community aspirations, the community voices are really important in planning and in those regulatory focuses. Another component that is important, I think, in councils is the removal of obligations for council to consider tikanga Māori when appointing CCO directors. This is a direct bad point that CCOs—council-controlled organisations—do not need to have the understanding of tikanga. There was a lot of opposition in that provision being removed, and the reason being is that, through the select committee process, the submissions that were pushing against it were from iwi groups and councils themselves, because, in this new process, there will no longer be the legal mandate to make things specific, which require the assessment during that recruitment process. What that means is you can get any individual who may not have a deeper understanding of why tikanga process is really important. Iwi and legal groups highlighted how these legislative changes will fundamentally reshape Māori representation in decision-making rights at that local level. The erosion of Te Tiriti is stripping tikanga provision, which fits into the wider legislation process. It reduces the statutory declaration of Māori rights, weakening Treaty-based protections in local governance. It is really important that when councils are looking at members of the community—the business community and the wider community—to appoint them on council-controlled organisations as a member of that governance role, those individuals have an appreciation, have an understanding, as to why tikanga is really, really important. It is really important that they have an inclusion of the whenua but, also, the understanding of why iwi do the main things and do what they do. They specialise in the area. Labour really pushes back on the weakening in this legislation. It is important that when we have individuals that are sitting on those governance boards, they are acting in the best interests for that community. It is important that when you are representing the people of your area in a council framework, that you have that understanding, because if it is not a requirement in the law then it opens the door to a number of things. Through the select committee process, there was strong representation from iwi groups, from councils that that is an important requirement for the people of that council area. As a member in my local community who had the privilege of sitting on different groups within the council framework, I got up close and personal in that deciding body to have an appreciation of mana whenua importance, the tikanga, but also the history of that whenua—so that when we are making decisions in that framework and that body, you have an understanding of the aspirations of mana whenua, and not just from last year or 10 years ago, but that you actually have a critical understanding of five centuries ago of iwi who came on to that whenua. Labour opposes this bill, because when you remove those important provisions from legislation, it places the burden on bricks and mortar for councils and does not look at its people and the rights that they have. MIKE DAVIDSON (Green) (12:43): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I stand on behalf of the Green Party in opposition to this bill. I wasn’t part of the first reading or the select committee process and I’m obviously now the primary speaker for this bill in the Green Party. I do have some knowledge within local government, serving as an elected member in Christchurch City for nine years. I know there’s a number of MPs that have been city or district or regional councillors, or committee board members, including the two to the left of me that have together served, I think, around 50 years. That’s actually a massive effort—and both as mayors of Wellington City. You don’t do that for the pay check; you do it because you know the importance of local government and what local government can deliver for communities. Centralism over localism doesn’t work. It’s a robbery of power and control from local communities, and central government shouldn’t be running roughshod over local communities. They are the words of Christopher Luxon before he was Prime Minister, and what we’ve seen since is pretty much the opposite. Very clearly, there are many attempts to remove the ability for local councils to democratically decide on local Māori wards. Local speed limits were removed; local signs that are in te reo, all gone. What we’re now seeing is the biggest reform in local government since 1989. The sector, actually, and many people around it, accept that reform is needed. Unfortunately, what we’re seeing once again is a Government that has taken a top-down approach and are doing it to the sector instead of with the sector. With this bill, the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill, it’s pretty much saying that the four wellbeings are bad and, because of that, rates are going up. Yet, there’s absolutely no evidence at all that would ever say that having four wellbeings in the Local Government Act is putting pressure on rates and making them go up. The primary policy objective of this is to reduce the pressure on rates, yet, really, the bill doesn’t address one of the biggest issues with councils, and that is funding. If this Government was serious about helping local government, they’d actually look at some of the funding mechanisms, including the potential of GST sharing. I look at a city like Christchurch that went through significant— Cameron Luxton: Great policy. MIKE DAVIDSON: GST sharing? Yes, excellent policy. Cameron Luxton: Yeah, it was an ACT policy. MIKE DAVIDSON: Thank you. It went through significant, significant damage from the earthquakes and had to rebuild. The ratepayers, the citizens of Christchurch, through their rates, have spent billions of dollars. The GST has all gone to central government. The revenue being gathered because of their rebuild is also significant, and the GST, once again, goes to Government. GST on rates—surely the GST from rates could be shared back with councils to help with infrastructure. But no, this Government knows best and, therefore, is just going to punish councils for trying to serve their community. The reality is that local government is the voice of community, and this Government is trying to silence that voice. It’s really interesting, when you read through this bill and what they’ve done, that as well as removing the four wellbeings, they’re trying to prescribe to councils what their core functions are. The select committee has softened that, but through this process they’re still putting core services that miss so many things, including, actually, economic development. And, once again, when you look at a city like Christchurch with Te Kaha, the council’s book can no longer help fund that. Who is going to be the one with the responsibility of helping in some of these spaces: climate mitigation, heritage, art galleries, community funding? The list goes on and on and on. If this bill passes, it will leave gaps in our community at a time when Government is limiting social supports and cutting funding for community organisations. What we’ve seen just recently, earlier this month, was the Minister’s announcement that they were putting an amendment to this bill to stop councils have a non-elected members appointed to committee with voting rights, something that has been happening for as long as I can remember. Audit and risk, health and safety—it has never been an issue until now; never. Democracy in local government is that, every three years, you elect your city councillors or your district councillors and those councillors can democratically create committees. Often, they’ll put specialised people with skills on to those committees that make recommendations to council to make the final decision. That is good governance—that is good governance. They have voting rights and they have the quorum. One thing we know, from after the Minister announced it—Minister Matt Doocey came on declaring that National has changed the law so the unelected councillors of Environment Canterbury (ECan) can’t vote on the council’s committee. The unelected ECan councillors he’s referring to are the two mana whenua reps. Now, unfortunately for Matt Doocey, he did not know the amendment that well, because he’s completely wrong with that fact. They’re not on a committee; they’re on the actual council, but it clearly showed that Matt Doocey was very happy that they were going to remove Ngāi Tahu’s representation on ECan. We know that there have been members of ACT-aligned councils down South that have obviously been pushing to remove mana whenua representation. Now, I’ve been trying to get answers from the Minister of Local Government, like: how many complaints are you getting from councillors? He’s been fobbing me off a bit, and he’s saying, “Oh, it’s not in the public’s interest to do this.” I managed to get a little bit of an answer from him, and, basically, he’s received one request to utilise these powers in relation to the Far North District Council—and we know that’s another ACT-aligned councillor not liking mana whenua representations on committees. It’s a very common theme that we’re seeing, that people are getting very upset that we have mana whenua representation sitting on council committees, which is really, really concerning. One could only describe this as political racism when we’re seeing a Government stopping councils having their rights to actually decide who sits on their committees to help make recommendations to the council, who have the final decisions. I do wonder if some of the people on the other side of this House—and I know Andy Foster knows—what councils actually do and what councils actually spend their money on. I implore you just to have a look at what you do in your daily life. From the moment you get up to the moment you go to sleep, you are using resources and facilities that are provided by the rates that are paid to councils. To say that councillors and councils are just trying to lift up rates as much as they can, don’t care about rates, is absolute rubbish. The councillors across the country try as hard as they can to keep rates as low as possible, but we’ve had this culture where councils are continually criticised for increasing rates. So while they try to keep rates down, infrastructure in the ground continually gets worse until it bursts, and then proactive councils, councils that want to do the right thing and fix that damaged infrastructure, then get blamed for lifting rates to do that. Then we have a Government that is completely failing in every space using council as their kicking bag to distract people from the real failure in New Zealand at the moment, which is this Government. This Government needs to actually accept the good things that councils do for their communities. They are the voice of their community. They are elected democratically every three years. This Government needs to have faith in local government and start working with it and stop dictating to it what it should and shouldn’t do. The Green Party opposes this shocking bill. CAMERON LUXTON (ACT) (12:53): Thank you, Mr Speaker. It’s great to see a Government working with local councils on things like regional deals and on things like infrastructure funds where councils who consent more can get more, and that’s what this Government has provided. On this specific bill, refocusing local government’s core purposes has been laid out in new section 10 in clause 6, which is going to be making councils focus on democratic, local decision-making, which the member Mike Davidson, who has just taken his seat, seems to have a big problem with—democratic accountability. It’s going to focus on infrastructure that’s cost-effective and delivers for the future needs of communities, public services that do the same, and providing regulatory functions, all at the same time supporting economic growth and development by performing those functions. That’s what the bill says. It doesn’t say all that lack of or the extra stuff that the last speaker, who seems to have so many problems that are so undefined, had to say for himself. Tim Costley: They want lower rates. CAMERON LUXTON: People in New Zealand want lower rates. They also want democratic accountability for the use of those rates. I’d just like to point out in my contribution a version of—the last speaker from the Greens talked about political racism. What is that? He left it undefined. Perhaps it could be people being appointed for their ethnicity, with voting rights, alongside elected councillors to make decisions on behalf of local communities with their lives and with their ratepayer dollars. That might be what the member was referring to. He left it so undefined that it’s hard to tell. But there is good news on horizon. The Minister of Local Government has made it clear in a press release that he’s putting forward an amendment to this bill—I think we should be able to see it at the committee of the whole House—which will remove unaccountable, unelected positions on council subcommittees from future councils being able to put that in. I think that he should be applauded for that. I’d like to point out that that’s what I’ve been lobbying him to do since September last year. I’ve got a member’s bill in the tin to make sure that exact thing happens, and I’ve also had Amendment Papers drafted up for the committee of the whole House, which I hope the Minister has had a good look at when he’s made his decision. He’s also—and I’ll just make a comment, Mr Speaker. The Minister has also referenced removing the Independent Māori Statutory Board; that is something he’s interested in. I think if he was to accept my member’s bill and amendments, he’d find that the actual requirement for those seats on the Auckland Council would no longer be required and it would be superfluous to carry on, but hey, look, let’s see what the Minister comes back to us with after mentioning publicly that he’s interested in doing that. Local council is the interface that most New Zealanders have in their daily lives with government and public services, being waste, roads, parks, libraries, community facilities. Those are all core functions that are considered in performing the role, and new section 11A in clause 7, maintains those, along with things like civil defence, public transport, and other things to do with network infrastructure. The hyperbole we’ve heard from the other side of the House this afternoon has been quite farcical. New Zealanders want to have an accountable and efficient local government that provides for their needs and the future needs and desires for the community that’s been built with them and around them. That’s what this bill provides. Thank you, Mr Speaker. ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Teanau Tuiono): Members, the time has come for me to leave the Chair for the lunch break. The House will resume at 2 p.m. The House adjourned at 12.57 p.m.

Documents and supporting material